ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00905268

A Study of Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Idebenone in the Treatment of Friedreich's Ataxia (FRDA) Patients

NCT00905268, Phase 3, Completed, Santhera Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2016-06-27

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Idebenone in the Treatment of Friedreich's Ataxia (FRDA) Patients. Trials, record NCT00905268. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00905268

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Idebenone in the Treatment of Friedreich's Ataxia (FRDA) Patients
NCT number
NCT00905268
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
232 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Santhera Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Friedreich's Ataxia
Interventions
idebenone, Placebo
First posted
2009-05-20
Last updated
2016-06-27
Results first posted
2016-06-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAbsolute Change in International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 52Baseline and week 52
The International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) is a commonly used evaluation and is composed of four clinical sub-scores involving the following: posture and gait, limb coordination, speech and oculomotor function.The ICARS score is the total sum of the sub scores and ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 indicative of the most severely affected outcome.
SecondaryAbsolute Change in Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 52Baseline and week 52
The Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) is made up of a measure of ataxia, and activities of daily living subscale and a neurological subscale. The scores from the three subscales are added to generate a total score ranging from 0 to 159, with a higher score indicating a greater level of disability.
SecondaryProportion of Patients Improving (Responding) on ICARS by a Clinically Relevant Marginweek 52
The International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) is a commonly used evaluation and is composed of four clinical sub-scores involving the following: posture and gait, limb coordination, speech and oculomotor function.The ICARS score is the total sum of the sub scores and ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 indicative of the most severely affected outcome. ICARS Responder Analysis at Week 52: Percentage of subjects Improving by 2.5 Points or More.
SecondaryProportion of Patients Improving on Left Ventricular Peak Systolic Strain Rate or Showing a Reduction in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) With no Worsening in Strain Rate1 year(In the statistical analysis sub-population presenting with cardiac involvement as defined by the FRDA cardiomyopathy criteria)
SecondaryChange in Peak Systolic Strain Rate From Baseline to Week 521 year
Mean Change of Peak systolic longitudinal strain rate (PSLSR) from Baseline to Week 52 in subjects with cardiac involvement (FRDA-CM criteria), where positive value in PSLSR is a deterioration and negative value an improvement.
SecondaryChange in Peak Workload From Baseline to Week 521 year
Assessed by a modified exercise test, in a subset of patients able to undertake this. Wpeak has been calculated from the following formula: Workload last fully completed stage + (seconds completed in last stage / 60 \* (4 \[if arm ergonometry\] or 10 \[if leg ergonometry\])).

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAbsolute Change in International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 52Baseline and week 52
The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication and had a confirmed diagnosis of FRDA, did not take idebenone within one month pre-Screening or between Screening and Visit 1, and were not under idebenone treatment at Baseline according to available PK results at Visit 1.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYAbsolute Change in Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 52Baseline and week 52The comparison was carried out in the ITT population, on data imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYProportion of Patients Improving (Responding) on ICARS by a Clinically Relevant Marginweek 52
The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the study medication and had a confirmed diagnosis of FRDA, did not take idebenone within one month pre-Screening or between Screening and Visit 1, and were not under idebenone treatment at Baseline according to available PK results at Visit 1.
percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Patients Improving on Left Ventricular Peak Systolic Strain Rate or Showing a Reduction in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) With no Worsening in Strain Rate1 yearSubgroup of subjects with cardiac involvement as defined by Friedreich's ataxia cardiomyopathy (FRDA-CM)percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Peak Systolic Strain Rate From Baseline to Week 521 yearSubgroup of subjects with cardiac involvement as defined by Friedreich's ataxia cardiomyopathy (FRDA-CM)1/sMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Peak Workload From Baseline to Week 521 yearWattsMEAN

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Absolute Change in International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 52Group A: Idebenone1.6Standard Deviation 5.85units on a scale
Absolute Change in International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 52Group B: Idebenone1.7Standard Deviation 6.64units on a scale
Absolute Change in International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 52C: Idebenone1.2Standard Deviation 5.22units on a scale
Absolute Change in International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 52D: Placebo1.1Standard Deviation 6.76units on a scale
Absolute Change in Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 52Group A: Idebenone0.9Standard Deviation 7.19units on a scale
Absolute Change in Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 52Group B: Idebenone1.2Standard Deviation 5.24units on a scale
Absolute Change in Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 52C: Idebenone1.4Standard Deviation 5.60units on a scale
Absolute Change in Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) Scores From Baseline Assessment to Week 52D: Placebo0.9Standard Deviation 6.77units on a scale
Proportion of Patients Improving (Responding) on ICARS by a Clinically Relevant MarginGroup A: Idebenone18.2percentage of patients
Proportion of Patients Improving (Responding) on ICARS by a Clinically Relevant MarginGroup B: Idebenone23.6percentage of patients

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDGroup A: Idebenone57
Overall StudySTARTEDGroup B: Idebenone57
Overall StudySTARTEDC: Idebenone59
Overall StudySTARTEDD: Placebo59
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGroup A: Idebenone53
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGroup B: Idebenone56
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDC: Idebenone59
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDD: Placebo57
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGroup A: Idebenone4
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGroup B: Idebenone1

Adverse events236

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherpalpitationsCardiac disordersGroup A: Idebenone1571
otherpalpitationsCardiac disordersGroup B: Idebenone1571
otherpalpitationsCardiac disordersC: Idebenone3593
otherpalpitationsCardiac disordersD: Placebo2592
othertachycardiaCardiac disordersGroup A: Idebenone3573
othertachycardiaCardiac disordersGroup B: Idebenone0570
othertachycardiaCardiac disordersC: Idebenone1591
othertachycardiaCardiac disordersD: Placebo2592
othervertigoEar and labyrinth disordersGroup A: Idebenone1571
othervertigoEar and labyrinth disordersGroup B: Idebenone2572

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup A: Idebenone
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup B: Idebenone
Total, all-cause mortalityC: Idebenone
Total, all-cause mortalityD: Placebo
Total, other adverse eventsGroup A: Idebenone5557
Total, other adverse eventsGroup B: Idebenone5257
Total, other adverse eventsC: Idebenone5259
Total, other adverse eventsD: Placebo5559
Total, serious adverse eventsGroup A: Idebenone757
Total, serious adverse eventsGroup B: Idebenone457

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00905268

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00905268/results?page=2