ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00929981

A Study To Assess Safety And Effectiveness Of Medrol In Contact Dermatitis In Indian Patients

NCT00929981, Completed, Pfizer; results first posted 2011-12-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study To Assess Safety And Effectiveness Of Medrol In Contact Dermatitis In Indian Patients. Trials, record NCT00929981. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00929981

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study To Assess Safety And Effectiveness Of Medrol In Contact Dermatitis In Indian Patients
NCT number
NCT00929981
Status
Completed
Enrollment
80 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Dermatitis, Contact
Interventions
Tablet Methylprednisolone (4 or 16 mg)
First posted
2009-06-30
Last updated
2019-01-02
Results first posted
2011-12-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryTreatment Status (Success/Failure) of Contact Dermatitis (CD) at the Second Follow-up VisitSecond follow-up visit (Day 5-28)
The signs and symptoms of CD were rated on Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) 5-point scale (range, 0 - 4 scale): 0 - no clinically relevant reaction; 1- macular erythema with induration; 2 - weak (non-vesicular) reaction with erythema, infiltration, and possible papules; 3 - strong (edematous or vesicular) reaction; 4 - extreme (spreading, bullous, ulcerative) reaction. "Success" was defined as a score of 0 or 1 and "failure" was defined as a score of 2, 3, or 4.
SecondaryTreatment Status (Success/Failure) of CD at the First Follow-up VisitFirst follow-up visit (between Day 6 to 10 after start of treatment)
The signs and symptoms of CD were rated on PGA 5-point scale (range, 0 - 4 scale): 0 - no clinically relevant reaction; 1- macular erythema with induration; 2 - weak (non-vesicular) reaction with erythema, infiltration, and possible papules; 3 - strong (edematous or vesicular) reaction; 4 - extreme (spreading, bullous, ulcerative) reaction. "Success" was defined as a score of 0 or 1 and "failure" was defined as a score of 2, 3, or 4.
SecondaryTreatment Status (Success/Failure) of CD at the Third Follow-up VisitThird follow-up visit (between Day 6 to 10 after EOT)
The signs and symptoms of CD were rated on PGA 5-point scale (range, 0 - 4 scale): 0 - no clinically relevant reaction; 1- macular erythema with induration; 2 - weak (non-vesicular) reaction with erythema, infiltration, and possible papules; 3 - strong (edematous or vesicular) reaction; 4 - extreme (spreading, bullous, ulcerative) reaction. "Success" was defined as a score of 0 or 1 and "failure" was defined as a score of 2, 3, or 4.
SecondaryTreatment Status (Success/Failure) of CD at the Final Follow-up VisitFinal follow-up visit (between Day 25 to 35 after EOT)
The signs and symptoms of CD were rated on PGA 5-point scale (range, 0 - 4 scale): 0 - no clinically relevant reaction; 1- macular erythema with induration; 2 - weak (non-vesicular) reaction with erythema, infiltration, and possible papules; 3 - strong (edematous or vesicular) reaction; 4 - extreme (spreading, bullous, ulcerative) reaction. "Success" was defined as a score of 0 or 1 and "failure" was defined as a score of 2, 3, or 4.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Participant-rated Clinical Severity Score of Lesions at First, Second, Third and Final Follow-up VisitsBaseline,First Follow-up(between Day 6-10 of start of treatment),Second(Day 5-28),Third(between Day 6-10 after EOT),Final(between Day 25-35 after EOT)
Participant-rated clinical severity score of lesions rated the severity of all symptoms in the past 24 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where 0 = No lesions and 10 = Most severe possible lesions.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Participant-rated Pruritus Score at First, Second, Third and Final Follow-up VisitsBaseline,First Follow-up(between Day 6-10 of start of treatment),Second(Day 5-28),Third(between Day 6-10 after EOT),Final(between Day 25-35 after EOT)Participant-rated pruritus score of lesions rated the severity of pruritus suffered in the past 24 hours on an 11-point NRS where 0 = no pruritus and 10 = most severe possible pruritus.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Investigator-rated Total Signs and Symptoms of CD Score at First, Second, Third and Final Follow-up VisitsBaseline,First Follow-up(between Day 6-10 of start of treatment),Second(Day 5-28),Third(between Day 6-10 after EOT),Final(between Day 25-35 after EOT)
Investigator-rated total signs and symptoms score of CD included pruritus, erythema, induration, vesiculation, edema or other specific sign or symptom rated on a 5 point scale of 0 - 4 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme) with a total score of 0 - 20 (lower score was preferred).

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYTreatment Status (Success/Failure) of Contact Dermatitis (CD) at the Second Follow-up VisitSecond follow-up visit (Day 5-28)Full analysis set (FAS) population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTreatment Status (Success/Failure) of CD at the First Follow-up VisitFirst follow-up visit (between Day 6 to 10 after start of treatment)FAS population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTreatment Status (Success/Failure) of CD at the Third Follow-up VisitThird follow-up visit (between Day 6 to 10 after EOT)FAS population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTreatment Status (Success/Failure) of CD at the Final Follow-up VisitFinal follow-up visit (between Day 25 to 35 after EOT)FAS population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Participant-rated Clinical Severity Score of Lesions at First, Second, Third and Final Follow-up VisitsBaseline,First Follow-up(between Day 6-10 of start of treatment),Second(Day 5-28),Third(between Day 6-10 after EOT),Final(between Day 25-35 after EOT)FAS population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Participant-rated Pruritus Score at First, Second, Third and Final Follow-up VisitsBaseline,First Follow-up(between Day 6-10 of start of treatment),Second(Day 5-28),Third(between Day 6-10 after EOT),Final(between Day 25-35 after EOT)FAS population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Investigator-rated Total Signs and Symptoms of CD Score at First, Second, Third and Final Follow-up VisitsBaseline,First Follow-up(between Day 6-10 of start of treatment),Second(Day 5-28),Third(between Day 6-10 after EOT),Final(between Day 25-35 after EOT)FAS population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.Units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group23

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Treatment Status (Success/Failure) of Contact Dermatitis (CD) at the Second Follow-up VisitMedrolSuccess93.895% Confidence Interval 86.01 to 97.94Percentage of Participants
Treatment Status (Success/Failure) of Contact Dermatitis (CD) at the Second Follow-up VisitMedrolFailure6.3095% Confidence Interval 2.06 to 13.99Percentage of Participants
Treatment Status (Success/Failure) of CD at the First Follow-up VisitMedrolSuccess52.5095% Confidence Interval 41.02 to 63.79Percentage of Participants
Treatment Status (Success/Failure) of CD at the First Follow-up VisitMedrolFailure47.5095% Confidence Interval 36.21 to 58.98Percentage of Participants
Treatment Status (Success/Failure) of CD at the Third Follow-up VisitMedrolSuccess100.0095% Confidence Interval 95.49 to 100.00Percentage of Participants
Treatment Status (Success/Failure) of CD at the Third Follow-up VisitMedrolFailure095% Confidence Interval 0 to 0Percentage of Participants
Treatment Status (Success/Failure) of CD at the Final Follow-up VisitMedrolSuccess100.0095% Confidence Interval 95.49 to 100.00Percentage of Participants
Treatment Status (Success/Failure) of CD at the Final Follow-up VisitMedrolFailure095% Confidence Interval 0 to 0Percentage of Participants
Change From Baseline in Participant-rated Clinical Severity Score of Lesions at First, Second, Third and Final Follow-up VisitsMedrolBaseline6.8Standard Deviation 1.62Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Participant-rated Clinical Severity Score of Lesions at First, Second, Third and Final Follow-up VisitsMedrolChange at first follow-up-4.1Standard Deviation 1.86Units on a scale

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDMedrol80
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMedrol80
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMedrol0

Adverse events1

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDermatitisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersMedrol180

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityMedrol
Total, other adverse eventsMedrol180
Total, serious adverse eventsMedrol080

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00929981

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00929981/results?page=2