ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00938704

Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Two Non-Preserved Artificial Tears for the Treatment of Dry Eye Signs and Symptoms

NCT00938704, Phase 4, Completed, Allergan; results first posted 2011-10-31

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Two Non-Preserved Artificial Tears for the Treatment of Dry Eye Signs and Symptoms. Trials, record NCT00938704. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00938704

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Two Non-Preserved Artificial Tears for the Treatment of Dry Eye Signs and Symptoms
NCT number
NCT00938704
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
71 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Allergan
Conditions
Dry Eye Syndromes
Interventions
carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% +glycerin 0.9%, sodium hyaluronate 0.18%
First posted
2009-07-14
Last updated
2011-10-31
Results first posted
2011-10-31

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at Week 2Baseline, Week 2
Change from baseline in OSDI at Week 2. The OSDI consists of 12 questions measuring the presence of ocular symptoms. Each of the 12 questions is assessed using a 5-point scale (0=none of the time; 4=all of the time). The score is converted to a 0-100 score where 0 is best and 100 is worst. Higher OSDI scores are associated with greater severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) at Week 2Baseline, Week 2
Change from baseline in TBUT at Week 2. TBUT is defined as the time required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. A positive number change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Week 2Baseline, Week 2
Change from baseline in corneal staining at Week 2. Staining of the cornea following ocular administration of fluorescein dye was graded using a 6-point scale (0=no staining, 5=diffuse staining). The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Temporal) at Week 2Baseline, Week 2
Change from baseline in conjunctival (temporal) staining at Week 2. Staining of the conjunctiva following ocular administration of lissamine green dye was graded using a 6-point scale (0=no staining, 5=diffuse staining). The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Nasal) at Week 2Baseline, Week 2
Change from baseline in conjunctival staining (nasal) at Week 2. Staining of the conjunctiva following ocular administration of lissamine green dye was graded using a 6-point scale (0=no staining, 5=diffuse staining). The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye severity. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at Week 2Baseline, Week 2Intent-to-Treat (ITT). The ITT population consisted of all patients who started the study (randomized).Scores on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) at Week 2Baseline, Week 2Intent-to-Treat (ITT). The ITT population consisted of all patients who started the study (randomized).SecondsMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Week 2Baseline, Week 2Intent-to-Treat (ITT). The ITT population consisted of all patients who started the study (randomized).Scores on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Temporal) at Week 2Baseline, Week 2Intent-to-Treat (ITT). The ITT population consisted of all patients who started the study (randomized).Scores on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining (Nasal) at Week 2Baseline, Week 2Intent-to-Treat (ITT). The ITT population consisted of all patients who started the study (randomized).Scores on a ScaleMEAN

Results by group20

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at Week 2Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%Baseline56.06Standard Deviation 13.43Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at Week 2Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18%Baseline54.292Standard Deviation 13.100Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at Week 2Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%Week 2-27.048Standard Deviation 17.87Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at Week 2Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18%Week 2-28.303Standard Deviation 21.821Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) at Week 2Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%Baseline6.501Standard Deviation 1.73Seconds
Change From Baseline in Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) at Week 2Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18%Baseline5.914Standard Deviation 1.646Seconds
Change From Baseline in Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) at Week 2Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%Week 22.919Standard Deviation 2.388Seconds
Change From Baseline in Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) at Week 2Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18%Week 22.538Standard Deviation 2.923Seconds
Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Week 2Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%Baseline1.818Standard Deviation 0.779Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Week 2Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18%Baseline1.608Standard Deviation 0.936Scores on a Scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCarboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%33
Overall StudySTARTEDSodium Hyaluronate 0.18%37
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCarboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%33
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSodium Hyaluronate 0.18%37
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCarboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSodium Hyaluronate 0.18%0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCarboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%
Total, all-cause mortalitySodium Hyaluronate 0.18%
Total, other adverse eventsCarboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%033
Total, other adverse eventsSodium Hyaluronate 0.18%037
Total, serious adverse eventsCarboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9%033
Total, serious adverse eventsSodium Hyaluronate 0.18%037

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, Glycerin 0.9% vs Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18%: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00938704

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00938704/registered