ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00938717

Trial of Linaclotide in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C)

NCT00938717, Phase 3, Completed, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; results first posted 2013-01-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Trial of Linaclotide in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C). Trials, record NCT00938717. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00938717

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Trial of Linaclotide in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C)
NCT number
NCT00938717
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
805 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Conditions
Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation
Interventions
Linaclotide or Matching Placebo
First posted
2009-07-14
Last updated
2013-11-05
Results first posted
2013-01-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAbdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 9 Out of 12 WeeksChange from Baseline to Week 12
A patient is considered to be a 9 out of 12 week APC responder if, for at least 9 out of the first 12 weeks of the treatment period, the patient had at least 3 CSBMs, had an increase of at least 1 CSBM from baseline, and had a decrease of at least 30 percent in their Abdominal Pain (AP) score from baseline during a particular week. The AP score assesses patient's worst AP in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no AP and 10 represents very severe AP. SBM is defined as a bowel movement that occurs in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the bowel movement or the calendar day before the bowel movement. CSBM is defined as an SBM associated with a sense of complete evacuation.
PrimaryComplete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder, 9 Out of 12 WeeksChange from Baseline to Week 12
A patient is considered to be a CSBM 3+1 responder if, for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, the patient had at least 3 CSBMs and experienced an increase of at least 1 CSBM from baseline during a particular week. A CSBM was defined as a Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) that was associated with a sense of complete evacuation. An SBM was defined as a bowel movement (BM) that occurred in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM.
PrimaryAbdominal Pain Responder, 9 Out of 12 WeeksChange from Baseline to Week 12
A patient is considered to be an abdominal pain responder if, for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, they experienced a decrease of at least 30 percent in the mean abdominal pain score from baseline during a particular week. The Abdominal Pain score assesses patient's worst abdominal pain in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain.
PrimaryAbdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 6 Out of 12 WeeksChange from Baseline to Week 12
A patient is considered to be a 6 out of 12 week APC responder if, for at least 6 out of the first 12 weeks of the treatment period, the patient had an increase of at least 1 CSBM from baseline, and had a decrease of at least 30 percent in their Abdominal Pain (AP) score from baseline during a particular week. The AP score assesses patient's worst AP in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no AP and 10 represents very severe AP. SBM is defined as a bowel movement that occurs in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the bowel movement or the calendar day before the bowel movement. CSBM is defined as an SBM associated with a sense of complete evacuation.
Secondary12-Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) FrequencyChange from Baseline to Week 12The change from baseline in 12-week CSBM frequency (i.e., weekly CSBM frequency over the first 12 weeks of the Treatment Period).
Secondary12-Week Spontaneous Bowl Movement (SBM) FrequencyChange from Baseline to Week 12The change from baseline in 12-week SBM frequency (i.e., weekly SBM frequency over the first 12 weeks of the Treatment Period).
Secondary12-Week Change in Stool ConsistencyChange from Baseline to Week 12
The consistency of each BM was assessed by patients using the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) from 1 to 7. 1. = separate hard lumps like nuts \[difficult to pass\] 2. = sausage shaped but lumpy 3. = like a sausage but with cracks on surface 4. = like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft 5. = soft blobs with clear-cut edges \[passed easily\] 6. = fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool 7. = watery, no solid pieces \[entirely liquid\]).
Secondary12-Week Change in Severity of StrainingChange from Baseline to Week 12Straining is measured on a 5-point scale where a value of 1 is "not at all" and a value of 5 is "an extreme amount".
Secondary12-Week Change in Abdominal Pain ScoreChange from Baseline to Week 12Abdominal Pain at its worst (in the last 24 hours) is based on an 11-point scale where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain.
Secondary12-Week Change in Abdominal DiscomfortChange from Baseline to Week 12Abdominal discomfort was assessed on an 11-point scale where a value of 0 is "none" and a value of 10 is "very severe".

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAbdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 9 Out of 12 WeeksChange from Baseline to Week 12
805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied.
participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYComplete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder, 9 Out of 12 WeeksChange from Baseline to Week 12
805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied.
participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYAbdominal Pain Responder, 9 Out of 12 WeeksChange from Baseline to Week 12
805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied.
participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYAbdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 6 Out of 12 WeeksChange from Baseline to Week 12
805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARY12-Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) FrequencyChange from Baseline to Week 12
805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied.
CSBMs per WeekLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARY12-Week Spontaneous Bowl Movement (SBM) FrequencyChange from Baseline to Week 12
805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied.
SBMs per WeekLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARY12-Week Change in Stool ConsistencyChange from Baseline to Week 12
805 patients were randomized to treatment; 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and included in the ITT Population; 134 patients with no pretreatment spontaneous bowel movements were excluded from the Stool Consistency analysis. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied.
Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARY12-Week Change in Severity of StrainingChange from Baseline to Week 12
805 patients were randomized to treatment; 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and included in the ITT Population; 134 patients with no pretreatment spontaneous bowel movements were excluded from the Straining analysis. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied.
Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARY12-Week Change in Abdominal Pain ScoreChange from Baseline to Week 12
805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied.
Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARY12-Week Change in Abdominal DiscomfortChange from Baseline to Week 12
805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied.
Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group28

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Abdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 9 Out of 12 WeeksPlacebo12participants
Abdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 9 Out of 12 WeeksLinaclotide51participants
Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder, 9 Out of 12 WeeksPlacebo20participants
Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder, 9 Out of 12 WeeksLinaclotide72participants
Abdominal Pain Responder, 9 Out of 12 WeeksPlacebo79participants
Abdominal Pain Responder, 9 Out of 12 WeeksLinaclotide156participants
Abdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 6 Out of 12 WeeksPlacebo56participants
Abdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 6 Out of 12 WeeksLinaclotide135participants
12-Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) FrequencyPlacebo0.70Standard Error 0.12CSBMs per Week
12-Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) FrequencyLinaclotide2.24Standard Error 0.12CSBMs per Week

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo403
Overall StudySTARTEDLinaclotide402
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo305
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLinaclotide294
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo98
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLinaclotide108

Adverse events34

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo10403
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersLinaclotide79402
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo24403
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersLinaclotide23402
otherSinusitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo28403
otherSinusitisInfections and infestationsLinaclotide23402
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo22403
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsLinaclotide22402
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo22403
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsLinaclotide17402

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, all-cause mortalityLinaclotide
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo86403
Total, other adverse eventsLinaclotide137402
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo7403
Total, serious adverse eventsLinaclotide4402

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
23116208DERIVEDPubMed
24075889DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons7

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Linaclotide vs Placebo: Abdominal Pain Responder, 9 Out of 12 WeeksTrial comparisons
Linaclotide vs Placebo: Abdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 6 Out of 12 WeeksTrial comparisons
Linaclotide vs Placebo: Abdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 9 Out of 12 WeeksTrial comparisons
Linaclotide vs Placebo: Abdominal Pain Responder for 6 Out of 12 WeeksTrial comparisons
Linaclotide vs Placebo: Complete Spontaneous Bowl Movement (CSBM) Responder for 6 Weeks Out of 12 Weeks of TreatmentTrial comparisons
Linaclotide vs Placebo: Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder, 9 Out of 12 WeeksTrial comparisons
Linaclotide vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00938717

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00938717/results?page=2