ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00943306

Long Term, Follow-on Study of Lomitapide in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

NCT00943306, Phase 3, Completed, Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; results first posted 2018-05-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Long Term, Follow-on Study of Lomitapide in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Trials, record NCT00943306. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00943306

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Long Term, Follow-on Study of Lomitapide in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
NCT number
NCT00943306
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
19 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Conditions
Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Interventions
lomitapide
First posted
2009-07-22
Last updated
2018-06-13
Results first posted
2018-05-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes54

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Baseline and Week 126Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).
SecondaryPercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Baseline and Week 174Percent change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 174 (Week 96 in Study AEGR-733-012).
SecondaryPercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Baseline and Week 222Percent change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 222 (Week 144 in Study AEGR-733-012).
SecondaryPercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Baseline and Week 246Percent change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 246 (Week 168 in Study AEGR-733-012).
SecondaryPercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Baseline and Week 270Percent change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 270 (Week 192 in Study AEGR-733-012).
SecondaryPercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Baseline and Week 294Percent change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 294 (Week 216 in Study AEGR-733-012).
SecondaryPercent Change in Total CholesterolBaseline and Week 126Percent change in Total Cholesterol from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).
SecondaryPercent Change in Total CholesterolBaseline and Week 174Percent change in Total Cholesterol from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 174 (Week 96 in Study AEGR-733-012).
SecondaryPercent Change in Total CholesterolBaseline and Week 222Percent change in Total Cholesterol from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 222 (Week 144 in Study AEGR-733-012).
SecondaryPercent Change in Total CholesterolBaseline and Week 246Percent change in Total Cholesterol from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 246 (Week 168 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Outcomes54

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Baseline and Week 126Week 126 Completers PopulationPercent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Baseline and Week 174
Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.
Percent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Baseline and Week 222
Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.
Percent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Baseline and Week 246
Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.
Percent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Baseline and Week 270
Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.
Percent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Baseline and Week 294
Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.
Percent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Total CholesterolBaseline and Week 126Week 126 Completers PopulationPercent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Total CholesterolBaseline and Week 174
Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.
Percent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Total CholesterolBaseline and Week 222
Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.
Percent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Total CholesterolBaseline and Week 246
Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.
Percent ChangeMEAN

Results by group54

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Lomitapide-45.5Standard Deviation 31.35Percent Change
Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Lomitapide-51.0Standard Deviation 16.03Percent Change
Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Lomitapide-58.5Standard Deviation 24.25Percent Change
Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Lomitapide-60.1Standard Deviation 18.51Percent Change
Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Lomitapide-74.0Standard Deviation 19.10Percent Change
Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Lomitapide-51.1Standard Deviation 10.11Percent Change
Percent Change in Total CholesterolLomitapide-43.2Standard Deviation 25.35Percent Change
Percent Change in Total CholesterolLomitapide-46.9Standard Deviation 15.21Percent Change
Percent Change in Total CholesterolLomitapide-51.0Standard Deviation 21.34Percent Change
Percent Change in Total CholesterolLomitapide-54.1Standard Deviation 16.88Percent Change

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLomitapide19
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLomitapide16
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLomitapide3

Adverse events132

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLomitapide219
otherIron Deficiency AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLomitapide119
otherAngina PectorisCardiac disordersLomitapide419
otherAortic Valve IncompetenceCardiac disordersLomitapide119
otherChest PainCardiac disordersLomitapide119
otherCoronary Artery DiseaseCardiac disordersLomitapide119
otherSinus BradycardiaCardiac disordersLomitapide119
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersLomitapide119
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersLomitapide119
otherHypothyroidismEndocrine disordersLomitapide119

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLomitapide119
Total, other adverse eventsLomitapide1719
Total, serious adverse eventsLomitapide719

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
17215532BACKGROUNDPubMed
36520008DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00943306

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00943306/registered?page=2