ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00952289

COntrolled MyeloFibrosis Study With ORal JAK Inhibitor Treatment: The COMFORT-I Trial

NCT00952289, Phase 3, Completed, Incyte Corporation; results first posted 2012-01-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. COntrolled MyeloFibrosis Study With ORal JAK Inhibitor Treatment: The COMFORT-I Trial. Trials, record NCT00952289. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00952289

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
COntrolled MyeloFibrosis Study With ORal JAK Inhibitor Treatment: The COMFORT-I Trial
NCT number
NCT00952289
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
309 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Incyte Corporation
Conditions
MPN (Myeloproliferative Neoplasms)
Interventions
Ruxolitinib, Placebo
First posted
2009-08-06
Last updated
2018-03-12
Results first posted
2012-01-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants Achieving ≥ 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline to Week 24Baseline and Week 24
Spleen volume was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or by computed tomography (CT) scans if MRI was not suitable, and analyzed by a blinded central laboratory reader. Patients who withdrew, crossed over to ruxolitinib prior to the visit, or had a missing value at the visit were considered non-responders.
SecondaryMaintenance of a ≥ 35% Reduction From Baseline in Spleen Volume Among Patients Initially Randomized to Receive RuxolitinibBaseline Visit and every 12 weeks until the data cut-off date (up to 14 months).
The maintenance of ≥ 35% reduction from Baseline in spleen volume was assessed up until the data cutoff date using the Kaplan-Meier method for patients who had at least one measured ≥ 35% reduction, and who either had at least one subsequent measurement or who subsequently dropped out prior to another assessment.
SecondaryDuration of Maintenance of a ≥ 35% Reduction From Baseline in Spleen Volume Among Patients Initially Randomized to Receive RuxolitinibBaseline Visit and every 12 weeks until the data cut-off date (up to 14 months).
The duration of ≥ 35% reduction from Baseline in spleen volume was defined as the longest duration of consecutive measurements of ≥ 35% reduction observed before the data cut-off date for patients who had at least one measured ≥ 35% reduction, and who either had at least one subsequent measurement or, who subsequently dropped out prior to another assessment. The duration of a ≥ 35% reduction from Baseline in spleen volume was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in Total Symptom Score From Baseline to Week 24
Baseline and Week 24. Baseline total score was the average of the daily total scores for the last 7 days prior to randomization. The Week 24 total score was the average of daily total scores from the 28 days prior to the Week 24 visit.
Symptoms of myelofibrosis were assessed using a modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) Version 2.0 diary. Using the diary, patients rated the following symptoms on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable): night sweats, itching, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left, feeling of fullness (early satiety), and muscle/bone pain. The total symptom score ranged from 0-60 and was calculated as the sum of the 6 symptom scores. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Symptom Score
Baseline and Week 24. Baseline total score was the average of the daily total scores for the last 7 days prior to randomization. The Week 24 total score was the average of daily total scores from the 28 days prior to the Week 24 visit.
Symptoms of myelofibrosis were assessed using a modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) Version 2.0 diary. Using the diary, patients rated the following symptoms on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable): night sweats, itching, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left, feeling of fullness (early satiety), and muscle/bone pain. The total symptom score ranged from 0-60 and was calculated as the sum of the 6 symptom scores. A higher score indicates worse symptoms hence a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryOverall SurvivalFrom randomization to the data cut-off date (up to 14 months).
Overall survival is reported here by the number of deaths from randomization until the data cut-off. Patients were censored at the time of database cut-off or the later of either the date of withdrawal or the date of last follow-up for patients who withdrew from study before the date of data cut. The survival time was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryOverall Survival TimeFrom randomization to the data cut-off date (up to 14 months).
Overall survival was assessed by the time to death or censoring. Patients were censored at the time of database cut-off or the later of either the date of withdrawal or the date of last follow-up for patients who withdrew from study before the date of data cut. The survival time was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryOverall Survival - Extended DataFrom randomization to 4 months after the data cut-off date (up to 18 months).
Overall survival is reported here by the number of deaths from randomization until 01 March 2011. Patients were censored at this time or the later of either the date of withdrawal or the date of last follow-up for patients who withdrew from study before the date of data cut. The survival time was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. This outcome reports data from August 2009 through March 2011 to coincide with a pre-planned New Drug Application (NDA) 120-day safety update.
SecondaryOverall Survival Time - Extended DataFrom randomization to 4 months after the data cut-off date (up to 18 months).
Overall survival was assessed by the time to death or censoring up until 01 March 2011. Patients were censored at this time or the later of either the date of withdrawal or the date of last follow-up for patients who withdrew from study before the date of data cut. The survival time was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. This outcome reports data from August 2009 through March 2011 to coincide with a pre-planned New Drug Application (NDA) 120-day safety update.
SecondaryOverall Survival at Week 144Week 144
Overall survival is reported here by the number of deaths from randomization until the data cut-off. Patients were censored at the time of database cut-off or the later of either the date of withdrawal or the date of last follow-up for patients who withdrew from study before the date of database cut-off. The survival time was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants Achieving ≥ 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline to Week 24Baseline and Week 24
Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all subjects randomized in the study. Treatment groups for this population were defined according to the treatment assignment at randomization. One patient was not included in the analysis due to a missing baseline spleen volume value.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMaintenance of a ≥ 35% Reduction From Baseline in Spleen Volume Among Patients Initially Randomized to Receive RuxolitinibBaseline Visit and every 12 weeks until the data cut-off date (up to 14 months).
Patients who had at least 1 measurement of ≥ 35% reduction from Baseline in spleen volume at any time during the study and had at least 1 subsequent measurement or withdrew prior to another assessment.
proportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of Maintenance of a ≥ 35% Reduction From Baseline in Spleen Volume Among Patients Initially Randomized to Receive RuxolitinibBaseline Visit and every 12 weeks until the data cut-off date (up to 14 months).
Patients who had at least 1 measurement of ≥ 35% reduction from Baseline in spleen volume at any time during the study and had at least 1 subsequent measurement or withdrew prior to another assessment.
weeksMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in Total Symptom Score From Baseline to Week 24
Baseline and Week 24. Baseline total score was the average of the daily total scores for the last 7 days prior to randomization. The Week 24 total score was the average of daily total scores from the 28 days prior to the Week 24 visit.
ITT evaluable population included patients with Baseline data and who did not have a 0 total score at both Baseline \& Week 24; data measured after the cross over date were excluded. Patients who withdrew, met cross over criteria prior to Week 24 or had a 0 Baseline score \& a nonzero/missing score at Week 24 were considered not meeting the endpoint.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Symptom Score
Baseline and Week 24. Baseline total score was the average of the daily total scores for the last 7 days prior to randomization. The Week 24 total score was the average of daily total scores from the 28 days prior to the Week 24 visit.
This analysis only includes patients who had a non-missing change from Baseline to Week 24. Data collected after the date of treatment cross over were not included in this analysis.scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYOverall SurvivalFrom randomization to the data cut-off date (up to 14 months).ITT populationparticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Survival TimeFrom randomization to the data cut-off date (up to 14 months).ITT populationweeksMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Survival - Extended DataFrom randomization to 4 months after the data cut-off date (up to 18 months).ITT populationparticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Survival Time - Extended DataFrom randomization to 4 months after the data cut-off date (up to 18 months).ITT populationweeksMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Survival at Week 144Week 144ITT populationparticipantsNUMBER

Results by group32

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants Achieving ≥ 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline to Week 24Ruxolitinib65participants
Number of Participants Achieving ≥ 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline to Week 24Placebo1participants
Maintenance of a ≥ 35% Reduction From Baseline in Spleen Volume Among Patients Initially Randomized to Receive RuxolitinibRuxolitinibStill Responder by 48 weeks0.7695% Confidence Interval 0.66 to 0.84proportion of participants
Maintenance of a ≥ 35% Reduction From Baseline in Spleen Volume Among Patients Initially Randomized to Receive RuxolitinibRuxolitinibStill Responder by 96 weeks0.6795% Confidence Interval 0.55 to 0.76proportion of participants
Maintenance of a ≥ 35% Reduction From Baseline in Spleen Volume Among Patients Initially Randomized to Receive RuxolitinibRuxolitinibStill Responder by 144 weeks0.2795% Confidence Interval 0.02 to 0.63proportion of participants
Duration of Maintenance of a ≥ 35% Reduction From Baseline in Spleen Volume Among Patients Initially Randomized to Receive RuxolitinibRuxolitinib135.095% Confidence Interval 107.6 to NAweeks
Number of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in Total Symptom Score From Baseline to Week 24Ruxolitinib68participants
Number of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in Total Symptom Score From Baseline to Week 24Placebo8participants
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Symptom ScoreRuxolitinibBaseline18.0Standard Deviation 10.9scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Symptom ScorePlaceboBaseline16.5Standard Deviation 11.5scores on a scale

Participant flow14

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
All ParticipantsSTARTEDRuxolitinib155
All ParticipantsSTARTEDPlacebo154
All ParticipantsSafety PopulationRuxolitinib155
All ParticipantsSafety PopulationPlacebo151
All ParticipantsCOMPLETEDRuxolitinib134
All ParticipantsCOMPLETEDPlacebo114
All ParticipantsNOT COMPLETEDRuxolitinib21
All ParticipantsNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo40
Patients Who Crossed Over to RuxolitinibSTARTEDRuxolitinib0
Patients Who Crossed Over to RuxolitinibSTARTEDPlacebo111

Adverse events318

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRuxolitinib52155
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo14151
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRuxolitinib45155
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo20151
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersRuxolitinib1155
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo8151
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersRuxolitinib16155
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo58151
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersRuxolitinib36155
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo32151

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRuxolitinib
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsRuxolitinib150155
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo147151
Total, serious adverse eventsRuxolitinib43155
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo53151

Papers11

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
22375971RESULTPubMed
23423753DERIVEDPubMed
23911705DERIVEDPubMed
24038026RESULTPubMed
25616577RESULTPubMed
25682576DERIVEDPubMed
26069290DERIVEDPubMed
26228487DERIVEDPubMed
28228106DERIVEDPubMed
28606598DERIVEDPubMed

1 to 10 of 11

See all 11 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Ruxolitinib vs Placebo: Number of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in Total Symptom Score From Baseline to Week 24Trial comparisons
Ruxolitinib vs Placebo: Number of Participants Achieving ≥ 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline to Week 24Trial comparisons
Ruxolitinib vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00952289

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00952289/results?page=2