ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00972738

Montelukast in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis - Spring 2001 Study (0476-235)

NCT00972738, Phase 3, Completed, Organon and Co; results first posted 2010-06-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Montelukast in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis - Spring 2001 Study (0476-235). Trials, record NCT00972738. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00972738

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Montelukast in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis - Spring 2001 Study (0476-235)
NCT number
NCT00972738
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,214 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Organon and Co
Conditions
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
Interventions
montelukast sodium, Comparator: loratadine, Comparator: Placebo
First posted
2009-09-07
Last updated
2022-02-03
Results first posted
2010-06-16
Limitations and caveats
In the paper patients who withdrew for worsening allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis were included under category of discontinued due to lack of efficacy rather than discontinued due to clinical Adverse Events

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodBaseline and over the 2-week treatment period
Mean change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms. Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 nasal symptoms of Congestion, Rhinorrhea, Itching, and Sneezing daily on a 4-point scale \[Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)\]. The average of the 4 individual nasal symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodBaseline and over the 2-week treatment period
Mean change from baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score. Patients were asked to rate each symptoms of Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening, Difficulty Going to Sleep, and Nighttime Awakenings daily on a 4-point \[Scale 0 (best) to 3 (worst)\]. The average of the individual symptoms scores was reported as the Nighttime Symptoms Score.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodBaseline and over the 2-week treatment period
Mean change from baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms scores. Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 eye symptoms of tearing, itchy, red, and puffy eyes daily on a 4-point scale \[0 (best) to 3 (worst)\]. The average of the 4 individual eye symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Eye Symptoms Score.
SecondaryPatient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment PeriodEnd of the 2-week treatment period
An evaluation by the patient, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale \[Score 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse)\], of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study.
SecondaryPhysician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment PeriodEnd of the 2-week treatment period
An evaluation by the physician, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale \[Score 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse)\], of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score After the 2-week Treatment PeriodBaseline and at the end of 2-week treatment period
Patients completed a validated, self-administered Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire, which included 28 questions on a 7-point scale \[Score 0 (best) to 6 (worst)\], across 7 domains: activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional. The individual domain scores were calculated as the average values of all scores within a domain, then the scores for the 7 domains were averaged for the overall score.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodBaseline and over the 2-week treatment periodThe primary efficacy analyses were based on intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle, i.e., all patients who had a baseline and at least one posttreatment measurement were included.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodBaseline and over the 2-week treatment periodThe primary efficacy analyses were based on intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle, i.e., all patients who had a baseline and at least one posttreatment measurement were included.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodBaseline and over the 2-week treatment periodThe primary efficacy analyses were based on intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle, i.e., all patients who had a baseline and at least one posttreatment measurement were included.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPatient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment PeriodEnd of the 2-week treatment periodThe primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle. Since only 1 measurement was obtained during the treatment period, no missing values were imputed.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPhysician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment PeriodEnd of the 2-week treatment periodThe primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle. Since only 1 measurement was obtained during the treatment period, no missing values were imputed.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score After the 2-week Treatment PeriodBaseline and at the end of 2-week treatment period
The primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle, i.e., all patients who had a baseline and a week 2 measurement were included. No missing values were imputed.
Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodMontelukast 10 mg-0.3895% Confidence Interval -0.43 to -0.33Scores on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodLoratadine 10 mg-0.4795% Confidence Interval -0.55 to -0.39Scores on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodPlacebo-0.2995% Confidence Interval -0.33 to -0.24Scores on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodMontelukast 10 mg-0.2895% Confidence Interval -0.32 to -0.24Scores on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodLoratadine 10 mg-0.2895% Confidence Interval -0.35 to -0.21Scores on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodPlacebo-0.2095% Confidence Interval -0.25 to -0.16Scores on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodMontelukast 10 mg-0.2895% Confidence Interval -0.32 to -0.23Scores on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodLoratadine 10 mg-0.4095% Confidence Interval -0.47 to -0.32Scores on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodPlacebo-0.2195% Confidence Interval -0.25 to -0.16Scores on a scale
Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment PeriodMontelukast 10 mg2.1895% Confidence Interval 2.05 to 2.31Scores on a scale

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDMontelukast 10 mg522
Overall StudySTARTEDLoratadine 10 mg171
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo521
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMontelukast 10 mg501
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLoratadine 10 mg165
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo492
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMontelukast 10 mg21
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLoratadine 10 mg6
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo29

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityMontelukast 10 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityLoratadine 10 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsMontelukast 10 mg0522
Total, other adverse eventsLoratadine 10 mg0171
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo0521
Total, serious adverse eventsMontelukast 10 mg0522
Total, serious adverse eventsLoratadine 10 mg0171
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo0521

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
12602669BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00972738

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00972738/registered