ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00976989

A Study of Pertuzumab in Combination With Herceptin and Chemotherapy in Participants With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

NCT00976989, Phase 2, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2016-06-20

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Pertuzumab in Combination With Herceptin and Chemotherapy in Participants With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Trials, record NCT00976989. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00976989

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Pertuzumab in Combination With Herceptin and Chemotherapy in Participants With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
NCT number
NCT00976989
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
225 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Interventions
Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, FEC, Docetaxel, TCH
First posted
2009-09-15
Last updated
2017-02-06
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2009-012019-17
Results first posted
2016-06-20

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimarySafety: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Cardiac Events as Assessed by the InvestigatorFrom baseline up to approximately 3.5 yearsLeft ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) as assessed by the Investigator, including Grade 3, 4 or 5 symptomatic LVSD with symptomatic cardiac events.
PrimarySafety: Percentage of Participants With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Decline During Pre-operative (Neoadjuvant) PeriodFrom baseline up to approximately 18 weeksPercentage of participants with LVEF measures decline of ≥ 10% from baseline and to a value of \<50% during the pre-operative (neoadjuvant) period.
SecondaryEfficacy: Percentage of Participants With Complete Pathological Response (pCR)At surgery, after 18 weeks (6 cycles) of treatment
pCR is defined as the absence of invasive neoplastic cells at microscopic examination of the tumor remnants after surgery following primary systemic therapy. pCR is evaluated after 6 cycles of treatment and surgery or following withdrawal from the study whichever occurs sooner.
SecondaryEfficacy: Clinical Response RateDuring each 3-week cycle of 6 total cycles: up to 18 weeks
Tumor response is defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) and is identified as per local practice. Clinical response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve a response of CR or PR at any time pre-surgery. Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by mammogram or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical breast examination (CBE), CR is disappearance of all target lesions; PR is \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.
SecondaryEfficacy: Time to Clinical ResponseUp to 18 weeks
Time to clinical response is defined as the time from the date of first dose received to the first date of assessment of clinical response. Clinical response is defined as a response of CR or PR at any time pre-surgery. Per RECIST v1.0 for target lesions and assessed by mammogram or MRI and CBE, CR is disappearance of all target lesions; PR is \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.
SecondaryEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Achieving Breast Conserving SurgeryAt approximately 18 weeks
This is the percentage of participants who achieved breast conserving surgery out of the intent-to-treat population without inflammatory breast cancer, as these participants received mastectomy irrespective of their response to neoadjuvant (pre-operative) treatment.
SecondaryEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Without an Overall Survival (OS) EventFrom baseline to end of study up to 5 years
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death from any cause. Participants who were alive or lost to follow-up were censored at the last known alive date. Participants with no post-baseline information were censored at the date of randomization plus one day.
SecondaryEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Disease-Free Survival (DFS) EventFrom baseline to end of study up to 5 years
The DFS was defined as the time from the first date of no disease (i.e., date of surgery) to the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death. PD was assessed using RECIST v1.0 and MRI and CBE. It was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Any evidence of contralateral disease in situ was not considered as PD. Participants who were withdrawn from the study without documented PD were censored at the date of the last assessment when the participant was known to be disease-free.
SecondaryEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Progression-Free Survival (PFS) EventFrom baseline to end of study up to 5 years
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first documentation of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was assessed using RECIST v1.0 and MRI and CBE. It was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Participants who were withdrawn from the study without documented PD were censored at the date of the last assessment when the participant was known to be free from PD. Participants without post-baseline assessments but known to be alive were censored at the time of randomization plus one day.
SecondarySafety: Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Symptoms Associated With Symptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)From Baseline to end of Neoadjuvant Period (up to 18 weeks), Adjuvant Period (up to 1.5 years), Follow-up Period (up to 3.5 years)Percentage of participants with signs or symptoms of cardiac events.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYSafety: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Cardiac Events as Assessed by the InvestigatorFrom baseline up to approximately 3.5 yearsSafety population included all participants who were randomized and received study drug.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYSafety: Percentage of Participants With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Decline During Pre-operative (Neoadjuvant) PeriodFrom baseline up to approximately 18 weeksSafety population included all participants who were randomized and received study drug.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEfficacy: Percentage of Participants With Complete Pathological Response (pCR)At surgery, after 18 weeks (6 cycles) of treatmentIntent to treat (ITT) population included all participants who were randomized to treatment.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEfficacy: Clinical Response RateDuring each 3-week cycle of 6 total cycles: up to 18 weeksITT population included all participants who were randomized to treatment.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEfficacy: Time to Clinical ResponseUp to 18 weeksITT population included all participants who were randomized to treatment.weeksMEDIAN
SECONDARYEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Achieving Breast Conserving SurgeryAt approximately 18 weeksNumber of participants analyzed represents the participants with T2-3 tumors for whom mastectomy was planned.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Without an Overall Survival (OS) EventFrom baseline to end of study up to 5 yearsITT population included all participants who were randomized to treatment.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Disease-Free Survival (DFS) EventFrom baseline to end of study up to 5 yearsITT population included all participants who were randomized to treatment. Number of participants analyzed is total number of participants evaluable during each period.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Progression-Free Survival (PFS) EventFrom baseline to end of study up to 5 yearsITT population included all participants who were randomized to treatment.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYSafety: Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Symptoms Associated With Symptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)From Baseline to end of Neoadjuvant Period (up to 18 weeks), Adjuvant Period (up to 1.5 years), Follow-up Period (up to 3.5 years)Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received treatment. Number of participants analyzed is total number of participants evaluable during each period.percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group48

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Cardiac Events as Assessed by the InvestigatorT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy0percentage of participants
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Cardiac Events as Assessed by the InvestigatorT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy2.7percentage of participants
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Cardiac Events as Assessed by the InvestigatorT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy1.3percentage of participants
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Decline During Pre-operative (Neoadjuvant) PeriodT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy5.6percentage of participants
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Decline During Pre-operative (Neoadjuvant) PeriodT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy5.3percentage of participants
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Decline During Pre-operative (Neoadjuvant) PeriodT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy3.9percentage of participants
Efficacy: Percentage of Participants With Complete Pathological Response (pCR)T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy61.695% Confidence Interval 49.5 to 72.8percentage of participants
Efficacy: Percentage of Participants With Complete Pathological Response (pCR)T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy57.395% Confidence Interval 45.4 to 68.7percentage of participants
Efficacy: Percentage of Participants With Complete Pathological Response (pCR)T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy66.295% Confidence Interval 54.6 to 76.6percentage of participants
Efficacy: Clinical Response RateT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy91.8percentage of participants

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy73
Overall StudySTARTEDT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy75
Overall StudySTARTEDT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy77
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy60
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy63
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy60
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy13
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy12
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy17

Adverse events435

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy4672
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy4475
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy5576
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy3872
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy4175
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy3476
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy2972
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy2775
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy3076
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy1972

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy
Total, all-cause mortalityT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy
Total, all-cause mortalityT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy
Total, other adverse eventsT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy7272
Total, other adverse eventsT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy7375
Total, other adverse eventsT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy7676
Total, serious adverse eventsT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy2372
Total, serious adverse eventsT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy1875
Total, serious adverse eventsT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy3176

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
23704196DERIVEDPubMed
25005255DERIVEDPubMed
28057664DERIVEDPubMed
29223479DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00976989

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00976989/results?page=2