ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00983580

Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine in Treating Patients at High Risk for Colorectal Cancer

NCT00983580, Phase 2, Completed, National Cancer Institute (NCI); results first posted 2018-04-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine in Treating Patients at High Risk for Colorectal Cancer. Trials, record NCT00983580. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00983580

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine in Treating Patients at High Risk for Colorectal Cancer
NCT number
NCT00983580
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
107 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Conditions
Adenomatous Polyp
Interventions
Aspirin, Eflornithine, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Placebo, Telephone-Based Intervention
First posted
2009-09-24
Last updated
2019-09-04
Results first posted
2018-04-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAdenoma Recurrence Rate for the Treatment Arm Relative to PlaceboAt 1 year
The primary endpoint is the proportion of participants with an adenoma recurrence at the 1-year follow-up colonoscopy exam. All eligible, randomized participants who have signed a consent form and received at least one follow-up endoscopy exam will be considered evaluable for the primary endpoint. This adenoma recurrence rate for DFMO + aspirin will be compared to double placebo to see if there is improvement in the adenoma recurrence rate in this patient population. A 1-sided Chi-square test was used to determine if there was a significant difference between treatment arms.
SecondaryACF Characteristics vs Adenoma Recurrence RateAt baseline and 1 year
A potential surrogate endpoint biomarker is the aberrant crypt focus (ACF). ACF are the earliest lesions that can be detected in colorectal mucosa and are believed to be precursors of adenomas and cancers. At the 1-year time point, the presence of adenoma recurrence and the number of ACF sites was recorded for each patient. The percent change in ACF number was calculated as the number of ACF present at the 1-year post-intervention exam minus the baseline number of ACF, divided by the number of ACF present at baseline. A negative score represents a loss in the number of sites and a positive number indicates an increase in the number of ACF sites. Therefore, the possible range in percent change cannot be lower than -100% and has no upper bound. A Wilcoxon Rank-sum test was used to assess the relationship between ACF percent change and adenoma recurrence rate. This analysis was only conducted in those participants who had at least 5 rectal ACF at baseline.
SecondaryCharacterization of ACFBaseline
A potential surrogate endpoint biomarker is the aberrant crypt focus (ACF). ACF are the earliest lesions that can be detected in colorectal mucosa and are believed to be precursors of adenomas and cancers. The number and total size of ACF sites may serve as risk markers for adenoma/carcinoma development. The median number of ACF sites per patient were collected prior to treatment.
SecondaryComparison of the Percent Change in ACF Number Across the 2 Treatment ArmsAt baseline and 12 months
The number of ACF sites per patient was collected at baseline and at 1-year time points. The percent change in ACF number was calculated as the number of ACF present at the 12-month post-intervention exam minus the baseline number of ACF, divided by the number of ACF present at baseline. A negative score represents a loss in the number of sites from baseline to year 1 post-treatment. A positive number indicates an increase in the number of ACF sites. Therefore, the possible range in percent change cannot be lower than -100% and has no upper bound. The percent change in ACF number between arms was compared using a t-test.
SecondarySafety, Tolerability, and Adverse Events of Study TreatmentUp to 48 months from beginning treatment.
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) Version 3.0 was used to grade all adverse events. The number of patients reporting a grade 3 or higher event are tabulated here. A grade 3 event is one categorized as being severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening. A grade 4 is considered life-threatening, and a grade 5 is death related to the event. A complete list of all adverse events is given in the Adverse Events section.
OtherEffect of the Study Drugs and Placebo With Respect to BiomarkersBaseline and 12 months
For continuous variables, we will use the 2-sample t-test (or nonparametric equivalent) to compare the active arm to the placebo arm. For categorical data, we will explore the relationship between the treatment arms and biomarkers with chi-square or fisher's exact tests. Correlations will be sought between caspase-3 staining, proliferative indices and their ratio, as well as other biomarkers using a chi-square test.
OtherGene Expression AnalysisBaseline and 12 monthsDifferences in log-transformed values among ACF or patient characteristics will be compared using t tests or analysis of variance (ANOVAs).

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAdenoma Recurrence Rate for the Treatment Arm Relative to PlaceboAt 1 year
On Arm 1, 1 patient cancelled prior to treatment, 1 was a violation, 3 were deemed ineligible, and 7 patients did not receive a follow-up endoscopy. On Arm 2, 3 patients cancelled prior to treatment, 1 was a violation, and 6 did not receive a follow-up endoscopy.
proportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYACF Characteristics vs Adenoma Recurrence RateAt baseline and 1 yearAll patients that were eligible, treated, analyzed for ACF at baseline and 12-months, and had 5 or more ACF at baseline were included in this analysis.percentage of change in ACF numberMEDIAN
SECONDARYCharacterization of ACFBaselineOf the 49 eligible patients receiving treatment in Arm I, 2 patients did not have ACF analysis done. The same number of patients of patients did not have ACF done in Arm II.number of ACF sitesMEDIAN
SECONDARYComparison of the Percent Change in ACF Number Across the 2 Treatment ArmsAt baseline and 12 monthsAll eligible treated patients that were assessed for ACF at baseline and after 1-year of treatment were included in this analysis.percentage of change in ACF numberMEAN
SECONDARYSafety, Tolerability, and Adverse Events of Study TreatmentUp to 48 months from beginning treatment.
On Arm 1, 1 patient cancelled prior to treatment, 1 was a violation, 3 were deemed ineligible. On Arm 2, 3 were ineligible, 1 was a violation. All other patients were treated and evaluated for toxicity and included in this evaluation.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDEffect of the Study Drugs and Placebo With Respect to BiomarkersBaseline and 12 monthsData were not collected for this endpoint.
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDGene Expression AnalysisBaseline and 12 monthsData were not collected for this endpoint.

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Adenoma Recurrence Rate for the Treatment Arm Relative to PlaceboArm I (Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine)0.595proportion of participants
Adenoma Recurrence Rate for the Treatment Arm Relative to PlaceboArm II (Placebo)0.581proportion of participants
ACF Characteristics vs Adenoma Recurrence RateAll PatientsNo Adenoma Recurrence at 12 months-20.8Full Range -89.5 to 237.5percentage of change in ACF number
ACF Characteristics vs Adenoma Recurrence RateAll PatientsAdenoma Recurrence at 12 months-45.0Full Range -100 to 300percentage of change in ACF number
Characterization of ACFArm I (Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine)11Full Range 0 to 42number of ACF sites
Characterization of ACFArm II (Placebo)7Full Range 0 to 31number of ACF sites
Comparison of the Percent Change in ACF Number Across the 2 Treatment ArmsArm I (Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine)-28.6Standard Deviation 51.1percentage of change in ACF number
Comparison of the Percent Change in ACF Number Across the 2 Treatment ArmsArm II (Placebo)10.6Standard Deviation 97.4percentage of change in ACF number
Safety, Tolerability, and Adverse Events of Study TreatmentArm I (Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine)Grade 3 Adverse Event0Participants
Safety, Tolerability, and Adverse Events of Study TreatmentArm II (Placebo)Grade 3 Adverse Event3Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDArm I (Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine)54
Overall StudySTARTEDArm II (Placebo)53
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm I (Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine)49
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm II (Placebo)49
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm I (Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine)5
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm II (Placebo)4

Adverse events26

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHearing test abnormalEar and labyrinth disordersArm I (Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine)1521
otherHearing test abnormalEar and labyrinth disordersArm II (Placebo)1501
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersArm I (Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine)2527
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersArm II (Placebo)4509
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersArm I (Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine)0520
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersArm II (Placebo)1501
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersArm I (Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine)0520
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersArm II (Placebo)1501
otherGastrointestinal disorderGastrointestinal disordersArm I (Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine)1521
otherGastrointestinal disorderGastrointestinal disordersArm II (Placebo)0500

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityArm I (Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine)052
Total, all-cause mortalityArm II (Placebo)050
Total, other adverse eventsArm I (Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine)452
Total, other adverse eventsArm II (Placebo)450
Total, serious adverse eventsArm I (Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine)052
Total, serious adverse eventsArm II (Placebo)150

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants2

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource
P30CA015083Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center Support GrantWILLMAN, CHERYL LYNNMAYO CLINIC ROCHESTERNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE1985 to 2025NIH RePORTER
R01CA113681Aberrant Crypt Foci as a Biomarker for ChemopreventionSINICROPE, FRANK A.MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTERNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE2006 to 2009NIH RePORTER

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Arm I (Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine) vs Arm II (Placebo): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Arm I (Acetylsalicylic Acid and Eflornithine) vs Arm II (Placebo): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00983580

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00983580/events?page=2