ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01001377

ASPECCT: A Study of Panitumumab Efficacy and Safety Compared to Cetuximab in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

NCT01001377, Phase 3, Completed, Amgen; results first posted 2014-03-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. ASPECCT: A Study of Panitumumab Efficacy and Safety Compared to Cetuximab in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Trials, record NCT01001377. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01001377

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
ASPECCT: A Study of Panitumumab Efficacy and Safety Compared to Cetuximab in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT number
NCT01001377
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,010 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Conditions
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Interventions
Cetuximab, Panitumumab
First posted
2009-10-26
Last updated
2022-09-21
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2009-010715-32
Results first posted
2014-03-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverall SurvivalFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.Overall survival is the time from the date of randomization until the date of death. Participants who had not died by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last contact date.
SecondaryProgression-free SurvivalFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.
Progression free survival (PFS) is the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression per the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or death. Participants alive and not meeting criteria for progression by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date. Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study based on all target lesions recorded since the treatment started (the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm), or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or any new lesions.
SecondaryObjective ResponseFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.
Objective response is either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST version 1.1. All participants that did not meet the criteria for an objective response by the analysis cut-off date were considered non-responders. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm, and disappearance of all non-target lesions, and no new lesions. PR: Disappearance of all target lesions, persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for either CR or progressive disease, or, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions with no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and no new lesions.
SecondaryDuration of ResponseFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.
Duration of response (DOR), calculated only for those participants with an objective response, is the time from first objective response to disease progression per the RECIST v1.1 or death. Participants not meeting criteria for progression or who died by the analysis data cutoff date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date.
SecondaryTime to ResponseFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.Time to response (TTR), calculated for those participants with an objective response, is defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of first objective response.
SecondaryTime to Treatment FailureFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.
Time to treatment failure (TTF) is the time from randomization date to date that the decision was made to end the treatment period for any reason; participants who remained in the treatment period at the time of analysis were censored at the date of the last on-study assessment.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in EuroQOL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Index ScoreFrom Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.
The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for use as a generic measure of health outcome. The health state index measures the following 5 health dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension contains 3 levels of response to reflect degree of problems participants have experienced: no problem (1), some problem (2) and extreme problems (3). The health states for each respondent are converted into a single index number using a specified set of weights. Resulting scores can range from 1.0 and -0.594. A higher score indicates a more preferred health status with 1.0 representing perfect health and 0 representing death. Negative scores are possible and represent health states regarded as less preferable than death (0). Repeated measures mixed model includes treatment, geographic region, ECOG score, assessment week, and treatment by assessment week interaction as fixed effects, and participants a random effect.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in EuroQOL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.
The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for use as a generic measure of health outcome. The VAS asks respondents to rate their present health status on a 0 - 100 scale, with 0 labeled as "Worst imaginable health state" and 100 labeled as "Best imaginable health state." The VAS score is determined by observing the point at which the participant's hand drawn line intersects the scale.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Colorectal Symptom Index (NCCN FCSI ) Symptoms ScoreFrom Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.
The FCSI consists of 9 questions comprising the most important symptoms associated with colorectal cancer, including energy, pain, weight, diarrhea, nausea, swelling or cramps in the stomach area, appetite, ability to enjoy life, and overall quality of life. The 9 questions are combined in three algorithms to provide information for 3 domains: colorectal cancer symptoms, physical well-being, and functional well-being. Each of the 9 items are scored from "0" to "4" representing "Not at All" through to "Very Much True". The raw score for all items is transformed to a 0-100 scale, and the average for each of the 3 subscales is calculated; high scores illustrate an improved state (e.g. able to enjoy life more).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in NCCN FCSI Physical Well-being Scale ScoreFrom Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.
The FCSI consists of 9 questions comprising the most important symptoms associated with colorectal cancer, including energy, pain, weight, diarrhea, nausea, swelling or cramps in the stomach area, appetite, ability to enjoy life, and overall quality of life. The 9 questions are combined in three algorithms to provide information for 3 domains: colorectal cancer symptoms, physical well-being, and functional well-being. Each of the 9 items are scored from "0" to "4" representing "Not at All" through to "Very Much True". The raw score for all items is transformed to a 0-100 scale, and the average for each of the 3 subscales is calculated; high scores illustrate an improved state (e.g. able to enjoy life more).

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYOverall SurvivalFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.Primary Analysis Set: All participants who were randomized and who received at least 1 dose of panitumumab or cetuximab; analyzed according to randomized treatment arm.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYProgression-free SurvivalFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.Primary analysis setmonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYObjective ResponseFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.Tumor Response Analysis Set: Participants in the primary analysis set with at least 1 Baseline unidimensionally measurable lesion per RECIST version 1.1.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of ResponseFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.Participants with an objective responsemonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to ResponseFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.Participants with an objective responsemonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to Treatment FailureFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.Primary analysis setmonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in EuroQOL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Index ScoreFrom Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.
Patient reported outcomes (PRO) analysis set: all participants in the primary analysis set who have a Baseline and at least one follow-up PRO assessment prior to clinical or objective disease progression per RECIST version 1.1. Participants with available data are included.
scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in EuroQOL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.Patient reported outcomes (PRO) analysis set participants with available datascores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Colorectal Symptom Index (NCCN FCSI ) Symptoms ScoreFrom Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.Patient reported outcomes (PRO) analysis set participants with available data.scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in NCCN FCSI Physical Well-being Scale ScoreFrom Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.Patient reported outcomes (PRO) analysis set participants with available data.scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group34

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Overall SurvivalCetuximab10.095% Confidence Interval 9.3 to 11.0months
Overall SurvivalPanitumumab10.495% Confidence Interval 9.4 to 11.6months
Progression-free SurvivalCetuximab4.495% Confidence Interval 3.2 to 4.8months
Progression-free SurvivalPanitumumab4.195% Confidence Interval 3.2 to 4.8months
Objective ResponseCetuximab19.7995% Confidence Interval 16.34 to 23.62percentage of participants
Objective ResponsePanitumumab22.0295% Confidence Interval 18.41 to 25.97percentage of participants
Duration of ResponseCetuximab5.495% Confidence Interval 3.8 to 5.5months
Duration of ResponsePanitumumab3.895% Confidence Interval 3.7 to 4.8months
Time to ResponseCetuximab2.6Inter-Quartile Range 1.2 to 3.1months
Time to ResponsePanitumumab1.5Inter-Quartile Range 1.2 to 3.0months

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCetuximab504
Overall StudySTARTEDPanitumumab506
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentCetuximab500
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentPanitumumab499
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCetuximab78
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPanitumumab85
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCetuximab426
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPanitumumab421

Adverse events530

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCetuximab30503
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPanitumumab29496
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersCetuximab74503
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersPanitumumab52496
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersCetuximab70503
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersPanitumumab39496
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersCetuximab87503
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPanitumumab88496
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersCetuximab26503
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersPanitumumab19496

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCetuximab
Total, all-cause mortalityPanitumumab
Total, other adverse eventsCetuximab474503
Total, other adverse eventsPanitumumab459496
Total, serious adverse eventsCetuximab169503
Total, serious adverse eventsPanitumumab151496

Papers7

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
24739896BACKGROUNDPubMed
27085587DERIVEDPubMed
27716478BACKGROUNDPubMed
29898991BACKGROUNDPubMed
30487126BACKGROUNDPubMed
32605298DERIVEDPubMed
33026965BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Cetuximab vs Panitumumab: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01001377

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01001377/results?page=2