ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01006603

Saxagliptin Compared to Glimepiride in Elderly Type 2 Diabetes Patients, With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin

NCT01006603, Phase 4, Completed, AstraZeneca; results first posted 2013-11-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Saxagliptin Compared to Glimepiride in Elderly Type 2 Diabetes Patients, With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin. Trials, record NCT01006603. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01006603

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Saxagliptin Compared to Glimepiride in Elderly Type 2 Diabetes Patients, With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin
NCT number
NCT01006603
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
957 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Conditions
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Interventions
Saxagliptin, Glimepiride
First posted
2009-11-03
Last updated
2013-11-28
Results first posted
2013-11-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProportion of Patients Reaching HbA1c <7% After 52 Weeks of Treatment Without Confirmed or Severe Hypoglycaemia.From week 0 to week 52.
Defined as obtained on or before the 8th day after the last dosing day, as determined by central laboratory. Safety analysis set. Confirmed hypoglycaemia defined as: any event defined as either a symptomatic event with blood glucose level \<3 mmol/L (\<54 mg/dL) and no need for external assistance, or an asymptomatic blood glucose measurement \<3 mmol/L (\<54 mg/dL). Major (or severe) hypoglycaemia defined as: symptomatic events requiring external assistance due to severe impairment in consciousness or behaviour, with or without blood glucose level \<3 mmol/L (\<54 mg/dL), but with prompt recovery after glucose or glucagon administration. These events may be associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure or coma. Plasma glucose measurements may not be available during such an event, but neurological recovery, attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal, was considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration.
SecondaryProportion of Patients Having Experienced at Least One Hypoglycaemic Event (Confirmed or Severe) Over the 52-week Double-blind Treatment Period.From week 0 to week 52.
Hypoglyceamic event defined as, Confirmed hypoglycaemia: any event defined as either a symptomatic event with blood glucose level \<3 mmol/L (\<54 mg/dL) and no need for external assistance, or an asymptomatic blood glucose measurement \<3 mmol/L (\<54 mg/dL). Major (or severe) hypoglycaemia: symptomatic events requiring external assistance due to severe impairment in consciousness or behaviour, with or without blood glucose level \<3 mmol/L (\<54 mg/dL), but with prompt recovery after glucose or glucagon administration. These events may be associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure or coma. Plasma glucose measurements may not be available during such an event, but neurological recovery, attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal, was considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration. Safety analysis set.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 52 in HbA1c.From week 0 to week 52.
Measured as the difference between the last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the 8th day after the last dosing date), and the last pre-randomisation HbA1c value, as determined by central laboratory. Full analysis set.
SecondaryProportion of Patients Achieving a Therapeutic Glycaemic Response at Week 52 Defined as HbA1c <7.0%From week 0 to week 52
Proportion of patients with their last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the 8th day after the last dosing date), as determined by central laboratory, below the specified limits. Full analysis set.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)From week 0 to week 52
Measured as the difference between the last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the first day after the last dosing date)and the last pre-randomisation fasting plasma glucose value, as determined by central laboratory. Full analysis set.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 52 in InsulinFrom week 0 to week 52
Measured as the difference between the last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the first day after the last dosing date) and the last pre-randomisation fasting plasma insulin value, as determined by central laboratory. Full analysis set.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 52 in β-cell Function (as Measured by Homeostasis Model Assessment-β [HOMA-β]From week 0 to week 52
β-cell function as estimated by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) model. Value is derived from FPG and fasting insulin; fasting insulin values below 2.074 μU/mL or above 57.595 μU/mL and FPG values below 3 mmol/L or above 25 mmol/L are excluded (as restricted by the calculation method used). Full analysis set.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProportion of Patients Reaching HbA1c <7% After 52 Weeks of Treatment Without Confirmed or Severe Hypoglycaemia.From week 0 to week 52.Safety analysis set (a subset of the randomised analysis set including patients who took at least one investigational product dose).percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Patients Having Experienced at Least One Hypoglycaemic Event (Confirmed or Severe) Over the 52-week Double-blind Treatment Period.From week 0 to week 52.Safety analysis set (a subset of the randomised analysis set including patients who took at least one investigational product dose).percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 52 in HbA1c.From week 0 to week 52.
The number of subjects with non-missing baseline and Week 52 (LOCF) values in the full analysis set (defined as the subset of patients in the randomized analysis set who took at least one randomised IP dose and have non-missing baseline and post-baseline efficacy data for at least one variable).
% of glycosylated hemoglobinMEAN
SECONDARYProportion of Patients Achieving a Therapeutic Glycaemic Response at Week 52 Defined as HbA1c <7.0%From week 0 to week 52
The number of subjects with non-missing baseline and Week 52 (LOCF) values in the full analysis set (defined as the subset of patients in the randomized analysis set who took at least one randomised IP dose and have non-missing baseline and post-baseline efficacy data for at least one variable).
percentage of respondersNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)From week 0 to week 52
The number of subjects with non-missing baseline and Week 52 (LOCF) values in the full analysis set (defined as the subset of patients in the randomized analysis set who took at least one randomised IP dose and have non-missing baseline and post-baseline efficacy data for at least one variable).
mmol/LMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 52 in InsulinFrom week 0 to week 52
The number of subjects with non-missing baseline and Week 52 (LOCF) values in the full analysis set (defined as the subset of patients in the randomized analysis set who took at least one randomised IP dose and have non-missing baseline and post-baseline efficacy data for at least one variable).
µU/mLMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 52 in β-cell Function (as Measured by Homeostasis Model Assessment-β [HOMA-β]From week 0 to week 52
The number of subjects with non-missing baseline and Week 52 (LOCF) values in the full analysis set (defined as the subset of patients in the randomized analysis set who took at least one randomised IP dose and have non-missing baseline and post-baseline efficacy data for at least one variable).
percentage of change from baselineMEAN

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Proportion of Patients Reaching HbA1c <7% After 52 Weeks of Treatment Without Confirmed or Severe Hypoglycaemia.Saxagliptin 5 mgAll patients37.9percentage of participants
Proportion of Patients Reaching HbA1c <7% After 52 Weeks of Treatment Without Confirmed or Severe Hypoglycaemia.Glimepiride 1 - 6 mgAll patients38.2percentage of participants
Proportion of Patients Reaching HbA1c <7% After 52 Weeks of Treatment Without Confirmed or Severe Hypoglycaemia.Saxagliptin 5 mgpatients aged <75 years (n=217, n=216)39.2percentage of participants
Proportion of Patients Reaching HbA1c <7% After 52 Weeks of Treatment Without Confirmed or Severe Hypoglycaemia.Glimepiride 1 - 6 mgpatients aged <75 years (n=217, n=216)33.3percentage of participants
Proportion of Patients Reaching HbA1c <7% After 52 Weeks of Treatment Without Confirmed or Severe Hypoglycaemia.Saxagliptin 5 mgpatients aged ≥75 years (n=142, n=143)35.9percentage of participants
Proportion of Patients Reaching HbA1c <7% After 52 Weeks of Treatment Without Confirmed or Severe Hypoglycaemia.Glimepiride 1 - 6 mgpatients aged ≥75 years (n=142, n=143)45.5percentage of participants
Proportion of Patients Having Experienced at Least One Hypoglycaemic Event (Confirmed or Severe) Over the 52-week Double-blind Treatment Period.Saxagliptin 5 mg1.1percentage of patients
Proportion of Patients Having Experienced at Least One Hypoglycaemic Event (Confirmed or Severe) Over the 52-week Double-blind Treatment Period.Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg15.3percentage of patients
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in HbA1c.Saxagliptin 5 mg-0.4495% Confidence Interval -0.51 to -0.37% of glycosylated hemoglobin
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in HbA1c.Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg-0.6495% Confidence Interval -0.71 to -0.57% of glycosylated hemoglobin

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDSaxagliptin 5 mg360
Overall StudySTARTEDGlimepiride 1 - 6 mg360
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSaxagliptin 5 mg289
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGlimepiride 1 - 6 mg285
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSaxagliptin 5 mg71
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGlimepiride 1 - 6 mg75

Adverse events186

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherVERTIGOEar and labyrinth disordersSaxagliptin 5 mg9359
otherVERTIGOEar and labyrinth disordersGlimepiride 1 - 6 mg0359
otherDIARRHOEAGastrointestinal disordersSaxagliptin 5 mg15359
otherDIARRHOEAGastrointestinal disordersGlimepiride 1 - 6 mg19359
otherCONSTIPATIONGastrointestinal disordersSaxagliptin 5 mg4359
otherCONSTIPATIONGastrointestinal disordersGlimepiride 1 - 6 mg10359
otherNAUSEAGastrointestinal disordersSaxagliptin 5 mg4359
otherNAUSEAGastrointestinal disordersGlimepiride 1 - 6 mg8359
otherNASOPHARYNGITISInfections and infestationsSaxagliptin 5 mg23359
otherNASOPHARYNGITISInfections and infestationsGlimepiride 1 - 6 mg35359

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySaxagliptin 5 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityGlimepiride 1 - 6 mg
Total, other adverse eventsSaxagliptin 5 mg130359
Total, other adverse eventsGlimepiride 1 - 6 mg129359
Total, serious adverse eventsSaxagliptin 5 mg41359
Total, serious adverse eventsGlimepiride 1 - 6 mg32359

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
25761977DERIVEDPubMed
27823868DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Saxagliptin 5 mg vs Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01006603

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01006603/events?page=2