Trial · NCT01008696
An Efficacy Study to Compare the Treatment Effects of Rabeprazole and Lansoprazole Depending on the Genotyping of CYP2C19 in Treating Reflux Esophagitis
NCT01008696, Phase 4, Completed, Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea; results first posted 2013-08-13
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. An Efficacy Study to Compare the Treatment Effects of Rabeprazole and Lansoprazole Depending on the Genotyping of CYP2C19 in Treating Reflux Esophagitis. Trials, record NCT01008696. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01008696
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- An Efficacy Study to Compare the Treatment Effects of Rabeprazole and Lansoprazole Depending on the Genotyping of CYP2C19 in Treating Reflux Esophagitis
- NCT number
- NCT01008696
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 4
- Enrollment
- 217 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea
- Conditions
- Reflux Esophagitis
- Interventions
- Rabeprazole, Lansoprazole
- First posted
- 2009-11-06
- Last updated
- 2013-08-13
- Results first posted
- 2013-08-13
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes3
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Completely Cured of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by Endoscopy Based on CYP2C19 | Day 57 | Reflux esophagitis evaluated by endoscopy as per LA Classification graded as: A=1 or more mucosal breaks no longer than 5 millimeter (mm) that did not extend between tops of 2 mucosal folds, B=1 or more mucosal breaks more than 5 mm long that did not extend between tops of 2 mucosal folds, C=1 or more mucosal break continuous between the tops of 2 or more mucosal folds but involves less than 75 percent of circumference, D=1 or more mucosal break involving at least 75 percent of circumference. Participants that were not categorized in any of the above mentioned grades (A to D) were considered as cured of reflux esophagitis. Participants were classified as CYP2C19 homozygous extensive, heterozygous extensive and poor metabolizers. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Symptoms of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by the Symptom Assessment Questionnaire | Baseline and Day 57 | Gastroesophageal reflux disease and abdominal GI-related symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, globus sensation, chronic cough, epigastric pain, non cardiac chest pain, hoarseness, dysphagia, abdominal distension, bloating, post-prandial discomfort, early satiety, nausea, vomiting, belching) experienced by participants were assessed and graded into 4 categories: 0 (Nothing)=No symptom, 1 (Mild)=A little but not uncomfortable, 2 (Moderate)=Present but interfering daily life activities a little, 3 (Severe)=Very uncomfortable, interfering daily life activities or sleeping. |
| Secondary | Overall Assessment of Study Medication by Investigator | Day 57 | Investigator's overall assessment of study medication based on the global symptom assessment was measured. The assessment was categorized as: 2=very good, 1=good, 0=as usual, -1=bad and -2=very bad. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes3
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Percentage of Participants Completely Cured of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by Endoscopy Based on CYP2C19 | Day 57 | The Full analysis set (FAS) included participants who received study medication at least once and had follow-up data that could be used after Baseline among participants who met eligibility criteria. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used. Here, 'n'=participants evaluated for particular category of this outcome measure. | Percentage of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in Symptoms of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by the Symptom Assessment Questionnaire | Baseline and Day 57 | The FAS included participants who received study medication at least once and had follow-up data that could be used after Baseline among participants who met eligibility criteria. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used. Here, 'n'=participants evaluated for particular category of this outcome measure | Units on a scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Overall Assessment of Study Medication by Investigator | Day 57 | The FAS included participants who received the study medication at least once and had follow-up data that could be used after the Baseline among the participants meeting the eligibility criteria of this study. LOCF was used. Here, 'N'=participants evaluated for this outcome measure. | Units on a scale | MEAN |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Results by group68
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Completely Cured of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by Endoscopy Based on CYP2C19 | Rabeprazole | Homozygous Extensive Metabolizer (n=42, 35) | 97.37 | Percentage of participants | |
| Percentage of Participants Completely Cured of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by Endoscopy Based on CYP2C19 | Lansoprazole | Homozygous Extensive Metabolizer (n=42, 35) | 93.94 | Percentage of participants | |
| Percentage of Participants Completely Cured of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by Endoscopy Based on CYP2C19 | Rabeprazole | Heterozygous Extensive Metabolizer (n=30, 38) | 100.00 | Percentage of participants | |
| Percentage of Participants Completely Cured of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by Endoscopy Based on CYP2C19 | Lansoprazole | Heterozygous Extensive Metabolizer (n=30, 38) | 100.00 | Percentage of participants | |
| Percentage of Participants Completely Cured of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by Endoscopy Based on CYP2C19 | Rabeprazole | Poor Metabolizer (n=15, 18) | 93.33 | Percentage of participants | |
| Percentage of Participants Completely Cured of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by Endoscopy Based on CYP2C19 | Lansoprazole | Poor Metabolizer (n=15, 18) | 100.00 | Percentage of participants | |
| Change From Baseline in Symptoms of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by the Symptom Assessment Questionnaire | Rabeprazole | Baseline: Heartburn (n=87, 91) | 0.61 | Standard Deviation 0.84 | Units on a scale |
| Change From Baseline in Symptoms of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by the Symptom Assessment Questionnaire | Lansoprazole | Baseline: Heartburn (n=87, 91) | 0.59 | Standard Deviation 0.89 | Units on a scale |
| Change From Baseline in Symptoms of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by the Symptom Assessment Questionnaire | Rabeprazole | Baseline:Regurgitation (n=87, 91) | 0.98 | Standard Deviation 0.93 | Units on a scale |
| Change From Baseline in Symptoms of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by the Symptom Assessment Questionnaire | Lansoprazole | Baseline:Regurgitation (n=87, 91) | 0.93 | Standard Deviation 0.96 | Units on a scale |
1 to 10 of 68Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 68 results by groupParticipant flow6
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | STARTED | Rabeprazole | 108 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Lansoprazole | 109 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Rabeprazole | 91 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Lansoprazole | 92 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Rabeprazole | 17 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Lansoprazole | 17 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Adverse events30
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Abdominal distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | Rabeprazole | 19 | 108 | |
| other | Abdominal distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | Lansoprazole | 18 | 109 | |
| other | Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Rabeprazole | 12 | 108 | |
| other | Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Lansoprazole | 17 | 109 | |
| other | Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | Rabeprazole | 10 | 108 | |
| other | Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | Lansoprazole | 15 | 109 | |
| other | Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | Rabeprazole | 9 | 108 | |
| other | Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | Lansoprazole | 12 | 109 | |
| other | Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | Rabeprazole | 10 | 108 | |
| other | Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | Lansoprazole | 10 | 109 |
1 to 10 of 30Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 30 adverse eventsAdverse event totals6
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Rabeprazole | ||
| Total, all-cause mortality | Lansoprazole | ||
| Total, other adverse events | Rabeprazole | 42 | 108 |
| Total, other adverse events | Lansoprazole | 42 | 109 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Rabeprazole | 2 | 108 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Lansoprazole | 0 | 109 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Papers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons1
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
| Comparison |
|---|
| Rabeprazole vs Lansoprazole: serious adverse events |
Source Trial comparisons
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01008696
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01008696/results?page=2