ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01008696

An Efficacy Study to Compare the Treatment Effects of Rabeprazole and Lansoprazole Depending on the Genotyping of CYP2C19 in Treating Reflux Esophagitis

NCT01008696, Phase 4, Completed, Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea; results first posted 2013-08-13

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. An Efficacy Study to Compare the Treatment Effects of Rabeprazole and Lansoprazole Depending on the Genotyping of CYP2C19 in Treating Reflux Esophagitis. Trials, record NCT01008696. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01008696

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
An Efficacy Study to Compare the Treatment Effects of Rabeprazole and Lansoprazole Depending on the Genotyping of CYP2C19 in Treating Reflux Esophagitis
NCT number
NCT01008696
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
217 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea
Conditions
Reflux Esophagitis
Interventions
Rabeprazole, Lansoprazole
First posted
2009-11-06
Last updated
2013-08-13
Results first posted
2013-08-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Completely Cured of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by Endoscopy Based on CYP2C19Day 57
Reflux esophagitis evaluated by endoscopy as per LA Classification graded as: A=1 or more mucosal breaks no longer than 5 millimeter (mm) that did not extend between tops of 2 mucosal folds, B=1 or more mucosal breaks more than 5 mm long that did not extend between tops of 2 mucosal folds, C=1 or more mucosal break continuous between the tops of 2 or more mucosal folds but involves less than 75 percent of circumference, D=1 or more mucosal break involving at least 75 percent of circumference. Participants that were not categorized in any of the above mentioned grades (A to D) were considered as cured of reflux esophagitis. Participants were classified as CYP2C19 homozygous extensive, heterozygous extensive and poor metabolizers.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Symptoms of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by the Symptom Assessment QuestionnaireBaseline and Day 57
Gastroesophageal reflux disease and abdominal GI-related symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, globus sensation, chronic cough, epigastric pain, non cardiac chest pain, hoarseness, dysphagia, abdominal distension, bloating, post-prandial discomfort, early satiety, nausea, vomiting, belching) experienced by participants were assessed and graded into 4 categories: 0 (Nothing)=No symptom, 1 (Mild)=A little but not uncomfortable, 2 (Moderate)=Present but interfering daily life activities a little, 3 (Severe)=Very uncomfortable, interfering daily life activities or sleeping.
SecondaryOverall Assessment of Study Medication by InvestigatorDay 57Investigator's overall assessment of study medication based on the global symptom assessment was measured. The assessment was categorized as: 2=very good, 1=good, 0=as usual, -1=bad and -2=very bad.

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Completely Cured of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by Endoscopy Based on CYP2C19Day 57
The Full analysis set (FAS) included participants who received study medication at least once and had follow-up data that could be used after Baseline among participants who met eligibility criteria. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used. Here, 'n'=participants evaluated for particular category of this outcome measure.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Symptoms of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by the Symptom Assessment QuestionnaireBaseline and Day 57
The FAS included participants who received study medication at least once and had follow-up data that could be used after Baseline among participants who met eligibility criteria. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used. Here, 'n'=participants evaluated for particular category of this outcome measure
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYOverall Assessment of Study Medication by InvestigatorDay 57
The FAS included participants who received the study medication at least once and had follow-up data that could be used after the Baseline among the participants meeting the eligibility criteria of this study. LOCF was used. Here, 'N'=participants evaluated for this outcome measure.
Units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group68

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Completely Cured of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by Endoscopy Based on CYP2C19RabeprazoleHomozygous Extensive Metabolizer (n=42, 35)97.37Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Completely Cured of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by Endoscopy Based on CYP2C19LansoprazoleHomozygous Extensive Metabolizer (n=42, 35)93.94Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Completely Cured of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by Endoscopy Based on CYP2C19RabeprazoleHeterozygous Extensive Metabolizer (n=30, 38)100.00Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Completely Cured of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by Endoscopy Based on CYP2C19LansoprazoleHeterozygous Extensive Metabolizer (n=30, 38)100.00Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Completely Cured of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by Endoscopy Based on CYP2C19RabeprazolePoor Metabolizer (n=15, 18)93.33Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Completely Cured of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by Endoscopy Based on CYP2C19LansoprazolePoor Metabolizer (n=15, 18)100.00Percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in Symptoms of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by the Symptom Assessment QuestionnaireRabeprazoleBaseline: Heartburn (n=87, 91)0.61Standard Deviation 0.84Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Symptoms of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by the Symptom Assessment QuestionnaireLansoprazoleBaseline: Heartburn (n=87, 91)0.59Standard Deviation 0.89Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Symptoms of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by the Symptom Assessment QuestionnaireRabeprazoleBaseline:Regurgitation (n=87, 91)0.98Standard Deviation 0.93Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Symptoms of Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by the Symptom Assessment QuestionnaireLansoprazoleBaseline:Regurgitation (n=87, 91)0.93Standard Deviation 0.96Units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRabeprazole108
Overall StudySTARTEDLansoprazole109
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRabeprazole91
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLansoprazole92
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRabeprazole17
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLansoprazole17

Adverse events30

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersRabeprazole19108
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersLansoprazole18109
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersRabeprazole12108
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersLansoprazole17109
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersRabeprazole10108
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersLansoprazole15109
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersRabeprazole9108
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersLansoprazole12109
otherDysphagiaGastrointestinal disordersRabeprazole10108
otherDysphagiaGastrointestinal disordersLansoprazole10109

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRabeprazole
Total, all-cause mortalityLansoprazole
Total, other adverse eventsRabeprazole42108
Total, other adverse eventsLansoprazole42109
Total, serious adverse eventsRabeprazole2108
Total, serious adverse eventsLansoprazole0109

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Rabeprazole vs Lansoprazole: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01008696

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01008696/results?page=2