ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01011556

A Study for the Transdermal Application of Teriparatide

NCT01011556, Phase 2, Completed, Eli Lilly and Company; results first posted 2012-10-23

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study for the Transdermal Application of Teriparatide. Trials, record NCT01011556. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01011556

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study for the Transdermal Application of Teriparatide
NCT number
NCT01011556
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
233 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Eli Lilly and Company
Conditions
Osteoporosis
Interventions
Subcutaneous Teriparatide, Transdermal Teriparatide
First posted
2009-11-11
Last updated
2012-10-23
Results first posted
2012-10-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 12 MonthsBaseline, 12 Months
Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). BMD values are corrected data and have been standardized across the machine types (Hologic and Lunar). Analyses were performed using ANCOVA model and least square (LS) means were adjusted for baseline BMD values as a covariate and pooled site and treatment as fixed effects.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 6 MonthsBaseline, 6 Months
Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). BMD values are corrected data and have been standardized across the machine types (Hologic and Lunar). Analyses were performed using ANCOVA model with the baseline value as a covariate and pooled site and treatment as fixed effects.
SecondaryTime Course Change of BMD Response at the Lumbar SpineBaseline to 6 Months and 12 Months
To assess the time course of the treatment, the BMD data of the lumbar spine was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) method, with the repeated measure occurring at each visit (for example, 6 and 12 month). BMD values are corrected data and have been standardized across the machine types (Hologic and Lunar).
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Procollagen Type 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP)Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 MonthsProcollagen Type 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) is a marker of bone formation.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline of C-Terminal Telopeptide (CTX)Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 MonthsC-terminal telopeptide is a marker of bone resorption.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen Type 1 C-Propeptide (P1CP) at 1 MonthBaseline, 1 MonthProcollagen Type 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) is a marker of bone formation.
SecondaryConvenience/Ease of Use Questionnaire (CEUQ)baseline up to 12 months
CEUQ consists of 5 sections and 16 questions using a 5-point Likert scale designed to collect measures for ease of use (S1), convenience of use (S2), confidence of use (S3), fear of use (S4), and overall satisfaction with therapy (S5). CEUQ is not a validated instrument.
SecondaryChange in Serum Calcium With and Without Adjustments for Serum Albumin From Predose to After 4 and 6 HoursBaseline, 12 Months
Serum calcium adjusted for serum albumin levels is calculated using the following formula: Total Calcium + \[(40 - albumin) x 0.02\]. Analysis for serum calcium and albumin adjusted serum calcium were collected at predose, 4 hours (h) post-dose (PD) and 6 h PD at baseline and 12 months (mon).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Urine Calcium Excretion at 6 and 12 MonthsBaseline, 6 Months, 12 Months
SecondaryChange From Pre-dose and Postdose Supine and Standing SBP and DBP at Baseline (BL) and 12 Months (Mon)Pre-Dose, 30 minutes, 2 hours Post-Dose at Baseline and 12 MonthsSystolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) measured at pre-dose and 30 minutes (min) and 2 hours (hr) post-dose in both the supine and standing position.

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 12 MonthsBaseline, 12 Months
All participants who received at least 1 dose of drug and had at least 1 baseline and post-baseline lumbar spine BMD measure. Analysis was performed using intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, last observation carried forward method and ANCOVA model.
percentage change in BMDLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 6 MonthsBaseline, 6 Months
All participants who received at least 1 dose of drug and had at least 1 baseline and post-baseline lumbar spine BMD measure. Analysis was performed using intent-to-treat principal, last observation carried forward method and ANCOVA model.
percentage change in BMDLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYTime Course Change of BMD Response at the Lumbar SpineBaseline to 6 Months and 12 MonthsAll participants who received at least 1 dose of drug, had at least 1 baseline and post-baseline lumbar spine BMD measure. Analysis was performed using ITT principal.percentage change in BMDLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Procollagen Type 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP)Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 MonthsAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. The intent-to-treat principle was applied.percentage change in P1NPMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline of C-Terminal Telopeptide (CTX)Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 MonthsAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. The intent-to-treat principle was applied.percentage change in CTXMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen Type 1 C-Propeptide (P1CP) at 1 MonthBaseline, 1 MonthAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug. The intent-to-treat principle was applied.percentage change in P1CPMEDIAN
SECONDARYConvenience/Ease of Use Questionnaire (CEUQ)baseline up to 12 months
All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had CEUQ assessment. Last observation was carried forward, unless the last observation was also the first completed questionnaire.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Serum Calcium With and Without Adjustments for Serum Albumin From Predose to After 4 and 6 HoursBaseline, 12 MonthsAll randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had serum calcium measurements or adjusted serum calcium measurements at the indicated timepoint.millimole/Liter (mmol/L)MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Urine Calcium Excretion at 6 and 12 MonthsBaseline, 6 Months, 12 MonthsAll randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had urine calcium measurements at the indicated timepoint.millimole/day (mmol/day)MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Pre-dose and Postdose Supine and Standing SBP and DBP at Baseline (BL) and 12 Months (Mon)Pre-Dose, 30 minutes, 2 hours Post-Dose at Baseline and 12 MonthsAll randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had predose and postdose blood pressure measurements at the indicated timepoint and body position.mmHgMEAN

Results by group404

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 12 Months20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide7.8090% Confidence Interval 6.867 to 8.730percentage change in BMD
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 12 Months30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide0.6390% Confidence Interval -0.321 to 1.578percentage change in BMD
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 12 Months50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide0.3290% Confidence Interval -0.657 to 1.287percentage change in BMD
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 12 Months80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide1.6390% Confidence Interval 0.739 to 2.519percentage change in BMD
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 6 Months20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide4.7490% Confidence Interval 3.953 to 5.537percentage change in BMD
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 6 Months30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide0.1690% Confidence Interval -0.661 to 0.983percentage change in BMD
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 6 Months50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide0.8890% Confidence Interval 0.051 to 1.705percentage change in BMD
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 6 Months80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide1.1990% Confidence Interval 0.418 to 1.957percentage change in BMD
Time Course Change of BMD Response at the Lumbar Spine20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide6 months (n=54, 52, 51, 58)4.7290% Confidence Interval 3.927 to 5.516percentage change in BMD
Time Course Change of BMD Response at the Lumbar Spine30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide6 months (n=54, 52, 51, 58)0.1990% Confidence Interval -0.630 to 1.019percentage change in BMD

Participant flow16

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTED20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide58
Overall StudySTARTED30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide56
Overall StudySTARTED50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide55
Overall StudySTARTED80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide64
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide57
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide56
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide54
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide64
Overall StudyCOMPLETED20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide52
Overall StudyCOMPLETED30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide48

Adverse events220

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide0570
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide2562
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide1541
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide0640
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disorders20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide2572
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disorders30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide0560
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disorders50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide1541
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disorders80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide0640
otherHypothyroidismEndocrine disorders20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide0570
otherHypothyroidismEndocrine disorders30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide2562

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortality20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide
Total, all-cause mortality30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide
Total, all-cause mortality50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide
Total, all-cause mortality80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide
Total, other adverse events20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide3057
Total, other adverse events30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide3356
Total, other adverse events50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide3054
Total, other adverse events80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide3964
Total, serious adverse events20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide257
Total, serious adverse events30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide256

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01011556

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01011556/results?page=2