ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01018680

A Study Comparing Duloxetine Versus Placebo in Patients Taking a Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID) for Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis

NCT01018680, Phase 3, Completed, Eli Lilly and Company; results first posted 2012-10-05

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study Comparing Duloxetine Versus Placebo in Patients Taking a Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID) for Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis. Trials, record NCT01018680. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01018680

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study Comparing Duloxetine Versus Placebo in Patients Taking a Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID) for Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis
NCT number
NCT01018680
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
524 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Eli Lilly and Company
Conditions
Osteoarthritis Knee Pain
Interventions
Duloxetine, Placebo
First posted
2009-11-25
Last updated
2012-10-05
Results first posted
2012-10-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes18

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in the Weekly Mean of the 24-Hour Average Pain Score at 8 WeeksBaseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)
The weekly mean 24-hour average pain score was calculated from the participant's daily 24-hour average pain ratings using an 11-point numeric rating scale, with scores from 0 (indicating "no pain") to 10 (indicating "the worst possible pain"). The Least Squares Mean estimates were adjusted for baseline, treatment, investigator (pooled), week, treatment\*week, and baseline\*week.
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at 8 Weeks8 weeks (blinded endpoint)
A scale that measures the participant's perception of improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. The score ranges from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). The Least Squares Mean estimates were adjusted for baseline value of Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S), treatment, investigator (pooled), visit, and treatment\*visit. The PGI-S measures participant's perception of severity of illness at the time of assessment. Scores range from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (extremely ill).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain, Stiffness, and Physical Function Subscale Scores at 8 WeeksBaseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)
Self-administered questionnaire captures elements of pain, stiffness, and physical disability in participants with osteoarthritis of the knee and/or hip. Index has 24 questions (5 on pain, 2 on stiffness, 17 on physical function). Each question uses a 5-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme). Pain scores range: 0 to 20. Stiffness scores range: 0 to 8. Physical function scores range: 0 to 68. Higher scores=greater impairment. Least Squares Mean estimates were adjusted for baseline value, treatment, investigator (pooled), visit, treatment\*visit, and baseline value\*visit.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Weekly Mean of the 24-Hour Night Pain and Worst Pain Scores at 8 WeeksBaseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)
Weekly mean 24-hour night pain and worst pain values are calculated from the participant's daily assessments of pain at night and worst pain during the previous 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale, with scores from 0 (indicating "no pain") to 10 (indicating "the worst possible pain"). The Least Squares Mean estimates were adjusted for baseline value, treatment, investigator (pooled), week, treatment\*week, and baseline\*week.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Severity and Interference Scores (BPI-S/BPI-I) Scores at 8 WeeksBaseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)
Measures pain severity and pain interference with function. Severity scores: 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) on each question. Interference scores: 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) on each question assessing interference of pain in past 24 hours for general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Mean interference is the average across the 7 interference items. The Least Squares Mean estimates were adjusted for baseline value, treatment, investigator (pooled), visit, treatment\*visit, and baseline\*visit.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) at 8 WeeksBaseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)
The CGI-S scale evaluates the severity of illness at the time of assessment. The scores range from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). The CGI-S must be administered by a study physician in the presence of the participant or after having been in the presence of the participant. The Least Squares Mean estimates were adjusted for baseline, treatment, investigator (pooled), visit, treatment\*visit, and baseline\*visit.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Patient Global Assessment of Illness (PGAI) at 8 WeeksBaseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)
The PGAI is a participant-rated measure of the severity of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee the participant has experienced in the past week as indicated on an 11-point numeric rating scale, with scores ranging from 0 to 10, where greater numbers reflect greater severity. The Least Squares Mean estimates were adjusted for baseline value, treatment, investigator (pooled), visit, treatment\*visit, and baseline\*visit.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Profile of Mood States-Brief Form (BPOMS) Total and Subscale Scores at 8 WeeksBaseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)
30-item BPOMS measures positive and negative aspects of mood states (item score: 0=not at all to 4=extremely). 5 negative factors: tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, fatigue-inertia, confusion-bewilderment; 1 positive factor: vigor-activity. Factor scores range: 0 to 20; high scores=negative mood (positive mood for vigor). Total score=sum of 5 negative factor scores minus vigor score; range: -20=least disturbed to 100=most disturbed. Least Squares Mean estimates adjusted for baseline value, treatment, investigator (pooled), visit, treatment\*visit, and baseline value\*visit.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Using Acetaminophen Weekly During the 10-Week Treatment PeriodBaseline through 10 weeks (blinded endpoint)
The Least Squares (LS) Mean percentage estimates of participants using acetaminophen was determined during each week individually over the full 10-week treatment period based on participant's daily Yes/No assessments for the use of acetaminophen. The LS Mean estimates for the main effect of treatment (average weekly use) were adjusted for baseline value, treatment, investigator (pooled), week, and treatment\*week.
SecondaryPercentage of Responders as Assessed by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Response Criteria up to 8 WeeksUp to 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)
OARSI response is composite Yes/No response assessed at 8 weeks based on decrease in 24-hour average pain ratings, range: 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"), improvement in functioning (using WOMAC physical function scores, range: 0 \[no difficulty\] to 68 \[extreme difficulty\]), and improvement in participant's impression of illness (using PGAI scores, range: 0 to 10; 10=greatest severity). OARSI responder=large response in pain or function components (50% relative and 20% absolute improvement), or moderate response (20% relative and 10% absolute improvement) in 2 of 3 components.

Outcomes18

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in the Weekly Mean of the 24-Hour Average Pain Score at 8 WeeksBaseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline weekly mean 24-hour average pain value were included in the analysis.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at 8 Weeks8 weeks (blinded endpoint)Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline PGI-S rating and at least 1 post-baseline PGI-I rating were included in the analysis.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain, Stiffness, and Physical Function Subscale Scores at 8 WeeksBaseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline WOMAC value were included in the analysis.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Weekly Mean of the 24-Hour Night Pain and Worst Pain Scores at 8 WeeksBaseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)
Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline night/worst pain value and at least 1 post-baseline weekly mean 24-hour night/worst pain value were included in the analysis.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Severity and Interference Scores (BPI-S/BPI-I) Scores at 8 WeeksBaseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline BPI-S/BPI-I value were included in the analysis.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) at 8 WeeksBaseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline CGI-S value were included in the analysis.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Patient Global Assessment of Illness (PGAI) at 8 WeeksBaseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline PGAI value were included in the analysis.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Profile of Mood States-Brief Form (BPOMS) Total and Subscale Scores at 8 WeeksBaseline, 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline BPOMS value were included in the analysis.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Using Acetaminophen Weekly During the 10-Week Treatment PeriodBaseline through 10 weeks (blinded endpoint)Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline weekly acetaminophen use value were included in the analysis.percentage of participantsLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Responders as Assessed by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Response Criteria up to 8 WeeksUp to 8 weeks (blinded endpoint)
Modified intent to treat (mITT) population: ITT participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline OARSI response value, last-observation-carried forward (LOCF) based on values of each of the 3 components listed in the outcome measure description were included in the analysis.
percentage of respondersNUMBER

Results by group136

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Mean of the 24-Hour Average Pain Score at 8 WeeksPlacebo-1.55Standard Error 0.11units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Mean of the 24-Hour Average Pain Score at 8 WeeksDuloxetine-2.46Standard Error 0.11units on a scale
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at 8 WeeksPlacebo2.93Standard Error 0.09units on a scale
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at 8 WeeksDuloxetine2.33Standard Error 0.09units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain, Stiffness, and Physical Function Subscale Scores at 8 WeeksPlaceboWOMAC Physical Disability Score (n=253, 251)-10.25Standard Error 0.82units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain, Stiffness, and Physical Function Subscale Scores at 8 WeeksDuloxetineWOMAC Physical Disability Score (n=253, 251)-15.09Standard Error 0.81units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain, Stiffness, and Physical Function Subscale Scores at 8 WeeksPlaceboWOMAC Pain Score-3.13Standard Error 0.24units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain, Stiffness, and Physical Function Subscale Scores at 8 WeeksDuloxetineWOMAC Pain Score-4.41Standard Error 0.23units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain, Stiffness, and Physical Function Subscale Scores at 8 WeeksPlaceboWOMAC Stiffness Score-1.45Standard Error 0.12units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain, Stiffness, and Physical Function Subscale Scores at 8 WeeksDuloxetineWOMAC Stiffness Score-1.88Standard Error 0.11units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo260
Overall StudySTARTEDDuloxetine264
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo199
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDuloxetine189
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo61
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDuloxetine75

Adverse events122

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersPlacebo22602
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersDuloxetine42644
otherVision blurredEye disordersPlacebo12601
otherVision blurredEye disordersDuloxetine52645
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo02600
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersDuloxetine52646
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo22602
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersDuloxetine42644
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo12601
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersDuloxetine72647

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, all-cause mortalityDuloxetine
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo129260
Total, other adverse eventsDuloxetine167264
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo3260
Total, serious adverse eventsDuloxetine5264

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
3068365BACKGROUNDPubMed
22017192DERIVEDPubMed
23485934DERIVEDPubMed
31505082DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Duloxetine vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01018680

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01018680/results?page=2