ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01032239

SISTERS: Spasticity In Stroke Study - Randomized Study

NCT01032239, Phase 4, Completed, MedtronicNeuro; results first posted 2018-02-15

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. SISTERS: Spasticity In Stroke Study - Randomized Study. Trials, record NCT01032239. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01032239

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
SISTERS: Spasticity In Stroke Study - Randomized Study
NCT number
NCT01032239
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
61 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
MedtronicNeuro
Conditions
Severe Spasticity
Interventions
intrathecal baclofen
First posted
2009-12-15
Last updated
2018-02-15
Results first posted
2018-02-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Average Ashworth Scale (AS) in Affected Lower Extremities From Baseline to Month 6Baseline and month 6
AS is a manual test, measuring the resistance to passive movement about a joint with varying degrees of velocity. Scores range from 1-5, with 5 choices. A score of 1 indicates no resistance, and 5 indicates rigidity. The following muscle groups in the lower extremities were assessed: hip flexors, hip adductors, knee extensors, knee flexors, plantar flexors and ankle-dorsal flexors. Average AS was calculated as the average of AS scores of the 6 muscles of the affected lower extremity. Change in average AS in affected lower extremities from baseline to month 6 between ITB and BMT arm was assessed. Change= AS at month 6 - AS at baseline.
SecondaryChange in Average Ashworth Scale (AS) in Affected Upper Extremities From Baseline to Month 6Baseline and month 6
AS is a manual test, measuring the resistance to passive movement about a joint with varying degrees of velocity. Scores range from 1-5, with 5 choices. A score of 1 indicates no resistance, and 5 indicates rigidity. The following muscle groups in the upper extremities were assessed: wrist flexors, elbow flexors, elbow extensors, shoulder abductors and shoulder adductors. Average AS was calculated as the average of AS scores of the 5 muscles of the affected lower extremities. Change in average AS in affected upper extremities from baseline to month 6 between ITB and BMT arm was assessed. Change= AS at month 6 - AS at baseline.
SecondaryChange in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Score From Baseline to Month 6Baseline and month 6
FIM contains 18 items composed of 13 motor tasks and 5 cognitive tasks. Tasks are rated on a 7-point ordinal scale that ranges from total assistance (or complete dependence) to complete independence. Ratings should reflect actual observed performance, not capability. Total score ranges from 18 (lowest) to 126 (highest) level of independence. Change in FIM total score from baseline to month 6 between ITB and BMT arm was assessed. Change=FIM score at month 6 - FIM score at baseline.
SecondaryChange in Average 10 Meter Time Walking Test (10MTWT) From Baseline to Month 6Baseline and month 6Change in average 10MTWT from baseline to month 6 beetween ITB and BMT arm. Change=10MTWT at month 6 - 10MTWT at baseline
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Were Able to Transfer From the Wheelchair to Bed Without Human Assistancebaseline, month 3, month 6
Patient was asked to transfer from the wheelchair to bed without human assistance. High level functional patient (HLP) could transfer. Low level functional patient (LLP) was not able to transfer. Comparison of the number and percentage of HLP and LLP between ITB and BMT arms was evaluated.
SecondaryChange in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) From Baseline to Month 6Baseline and month 6
NPRS is designed to assess the level of pain a patient is feeling at a point in time. The following questions has been presented to patients: What is your actual spasticity-related or spasm-related pain? What was your least spasticity-related or spasm-related pain during the last week? What was your worst spasticity-related or spasm-related pain during the last week? The patient indicated how much pain he is feeling on a scale from 0 to 10. A score of 0 (zero) is "no pain" while a score of 10 (ten) is "worst possible pain". Change in NPRS related to actual, least or worst pain from baseline to month 6 between ITB and BMT arm was assessed. Change=NPRS at month 6 - NPRS at baseline.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Achieved Their Primary Therapeutic Goal Assessed With the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)month 6
GAS is designed to measure the achievement of treatment goals using the following 6 levels of achievement: worse than start (-3), much less than expected (-2), somewhat less than expected (-1), as expected (0), somewhat more than expected (+1), much more than expected (+2). The primary therapy goal and the criteria for the levels of achievement was defined by the medical team together with the patient and his/her family/legal representative/caregiver at the first day of the study. The number and percentage of patients who achieved the therapeutic goal at Month 6 was compared between the ITB and BMT arm.
SecondaryChange in Euro QoL Group-5 Dimensional, 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) From Baseline to Month 6Baseline and month 6
The EQ-5D-3L is a generic measure of health status consisting in the EQ-5D-3L descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system is characterized on five dimensions: mobility, self-care, ability to undertake usual activities, pain and anxiety/depression. Patients were asked to indicate their level of health on each dimension using one of three levels: "no health problems", "moderate health problems", and "severe health problems". Responses from the questionnaire were converted to a single health index utility score; this ranges from -0.595 to 1. EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale from 0 to 100 where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' (100) and 'Worst imaginable health state' (0). Change in EQ-5D-3L utility score and VAS score from baseline to month 6 between ITB and BMT arm were assessed. Change=EQ-5D-3L utility or VAS score at month 6 - EQ-5D-3L utility or VAS score.
SecondaryChange in SF-12 (12-item Short Form) From Baseline to Month 6Baseline and month 6
The SF-12 is generic assessment of health-related quality of life, which evaluates 8 health dimensions (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, mental health, and general health). Subscale scores for each dimension were aggregated into summary scores for physical (PCS) and mental health (MCS) components (ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health). Changes in the PCS and MCS from baseline to Month 6 were both compared between the BMT and ITB arms. Change=SF-12 score at month 6 - SF-12 score at baseline.
SecondaryChange in Stroke Specific Quality of Life (SS-QoL ) From Baseline to Month 6Baseline and month 6
SS-QoL questionnaire is a self-assessed quality of life questionnaire specifically designed for post-stroke patients. It evaluates 49 items across 12-domains: personality, energy, language, mobility, vision, upper extremity function, thinking, mood, work/productivity, self-care, and family and social roles. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert Scale, measuring either positive or negative response to a statement. Summary score is composed of an unweighted average of the 12 domain scores, with higher scores indicating better QoL. Total score ranges from 1 to 5. Change in SS-QoL summary score from baseline to month 6 between ITB and BMT arm was assessed. Change=SS-QoL score at month 6 - SS-QoL score at baseline.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Average Ashworth Scale (AS) in Affected Lower Extremities From Baseline to Month 6Baseline and month 6Intent to treat analysis. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) imputation method.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Average Ashworth Scale (AS) in Affected Upper Extremities From Baseline to Month 6Baseline and month 6Intent to treat analysis. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) imputation method.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Score From Baseline to Month 6Baseline and month 6Intent to treat analysis. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) imputation method.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Average 10 Meter Time Walking Test (10MTWT) From Baseline to Month 6Baseline and month 6
Intent to treat analysis. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) imputation method.Only High level functional patients (HLP) were analyzed. HLP were defined as patients able to transfer from the wheelchair to bed without human assistance.
secondsMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Were Able to Transfer From the Wheelchair to Bed Without Human Assistancebaseline, month 3, month 6Intent to treat analysisParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) From Baseline to Month 6Baseline and month 6Intent to treat analysis. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) imputation method.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Achieved Their Primary Therapeutic Goal Assessed With the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)month 6Intent to treat analysisParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange in Euro QoL Group-5 Dimensional, 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) From Baseline to Month 6Baseline and month 6Intent to treat analysis. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) imputation method.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in SF-12 (12-item Short Form) From Baseline to Month 6Baseline and month 6Intent to treat analysis. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) imputation method.~SF-12 assessment has been introduced later in a second version of the protocol, hence the lower number of patients.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Stroke Specific Quality of Life (SS-QoL ) From Baseline to Month 6Baseline and month 6Intent to treat analysis. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) imputation method.units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group96

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Average Ashworth Scale (AS) in Affected Lower Extremities From Baseline to Month 6ITB Therapy-0.99Standard Deviation 0.75units on a scale
Change in Average Ashworth Scale (AS) in Affected Lower Extremities From Baseline to Month 6Best Medical Treatment (BMT)-0.43Standard Deviation 0.72units on a scale
Change in Average Ashworth Scale (AS) in Affected Upper Extremities From Baseline to Month 6ITB Therapy-0.66Standard Deviation 0.59units on a scale
Change in Average Ashworth Scale (AS) in Affected Upper Extremities From Baseline to Month 6Best Medical Treatment (BMT)-0.17Standard Deviation 0.70units on a scale
Change in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Score From Baseline to Month 6ITB Therapy2.68Standard Deviation 10.31units on a scale
Change in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Score From Baseline to Month 6Best Medical Treatment (BMT)-2.58Standard Deviation 11.00units on a scale
Change in Average 10 Meter Time Walking Test (10MTWT) From Baseline to Month 6ITB Therapy4.86Standard Deviation 59.82seconds
Change in Average 10 Meter Time Walking Test (10MTWT) From Baseline to Month 6Best Medical Treatment (BMT)-2.48Standard Deviation 65.60seconds
Number of Participants Who Were Able to Transfer From the Wheelchair to Bed Without Human AssistanceITB TherapyBaseline / HLP22Participants
Number of Participants Who Were Able to Transfer From the Wheelchair to Bed Without Human AssistanceBest Medical Treatment (BMT)Baseline / HLP24Participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDITB Therapy31
Overall StudySTARTEDBest Medical Treatment (BMT)29
Overall StudyImplantITB Therapy25
Overall StudyImplantBest Medical Treatment (BMT)0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDITB Therapy24
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBest Medical Treatment (BMT)24
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDITB Therapy7
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBest Medical Treatment (BMT)5

Adverse events284

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherCerumen impactionEar and labyrinth disordersITB-I2252
otherCerumen impactionEar and labyrinth disordersBMT+ITB-NI0350
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersITB-I1251
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersBMT+ITB-NI0350
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersITB-I0250
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersBMT+ITB-NI1351
otherCataractEye disordersITB-I1252
otherCataractEye disordersBMT+ITB-NI0350
otherConjunctivitisEye disordersITB-I1251
otherConjunctivitisEye disordersBMT+ITB-NI0350

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityITB-I125
Total, all-cause mortalityBMT+ITB-NI035
Total, other adverse eventsITB-I2325
Total, other adverse eventsBMT+ITB-NI2135
Total, serious adverse eventsITB-I1225
Total, serious adverse eventsBMT+ITB-NI1035

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
29326296DERIVEDPubMed
30354975DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
ITB-I vs BMT+ITB-NI: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
ITB-I vs BMT+ITB-NI: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01032239

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01032239/results?page=2