ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01039376

Ofatumumab Maintenance Treatment vs No Further Treatment in Relapsed CLL Responding to Induction Therapy

NCT01039376, Phase 3, Terminated, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2015-04-21

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Ofatumumab Maintenance Treatment vs No Further Treatment in Relapsed CLL Responding to Induction Therapy. Trials, record NCT01039376. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01039376

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Ofatumumab Maintenance Treatment vs No Further Treatment in Relapsed CLL Responding to Induction Therapy
NCT number
NCT01039376
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
480 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic
Interventions
Ofatumumab, Observation
First posted
2009-12-25
Last updated
2019-07-30
Results first posted
2015-04-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes27

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-free Survival, as Assessed by the InvestigatorFrom randomization until progression or death (up to 79 months)
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. PD was determined by the investigator according to the definitions of response in the International Workshop for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) updated National Cancer Institute-Sponsored Working Group (NCI-WG) guidelines. According to the guidelines, PD is characterized by at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy (appearance of any new lesion such as enlarged lymph nodes (\>1.5 centimeter \[cm\]), spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site); an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen; an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter; transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
PrimaryProgression-free Survival, as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)From randomization until progression or death (up to 79 months)
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. PD was determined by the IRC according to the definitions of response in the International Workshop for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) updated National Cancer Institute-Sponsored Working Group (NCI-WG) guidelines. According to the guidelines, PD is characterized by at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy (appearance of any new lesion such as enlarged lymph nodes (\>1.5 centimeter \[cm\]), spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site); an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen; an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter; transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
SecondaryOverall SurvivalFrom randomization until death (up to 88 months)Overall survival is defined as time from randomization to date of death.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Improvement in Response From BaselineFrom Baseline until the end of the study (up to 88 months)Improvement in response was assessed by calculating the percentage of participants who changed from partial response (PR) at Baseline to complete response during the study.
SecondaryTime to Next TherapyFrom randomization until the end of the study (up to 88 months)Time to next therapy is defined as the time from randomization to the date of receiving the next CLL treatment.
SecondaryProgression-free Survival After Next-line TherapyFrom randomization until progression or death (up to 88 months)
Progression-free survival after next-line therapy is defined as the time from randomization until progression or death following the next-line therapy and counted as events deaths prior to next-line therapy. Participants who received next-line therapy and who did not have progression or death after next-line therapy were censored at their last date of contact. Participant who died prior to next-line therapy, was counted as an event.
SecondaryTime to Progression After Next-line TherapyFrom randomization until progression or death (up to 88 months)
Time to progression after next-line therapy is defined as the time from progression following randomization until progression or death following next-line therapy and counted as events deaths prior to next-line therapy. Participants who received next-line therapy with a PD prior to receiving next line therapy and who did not had progression or death after next-line therapy were censored at their last date of contact. If a participant died prior to next-line therapy, this was counted as an event.
SecondaryChange From Baseline (BL) in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)From randomization until the end of the study (up to 47 months)
The EORTC QLQ-CLL16 is comprised of 16 questions that address 5 domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) important in CLL. There are 4 multi-item scales - fatigue (2 items), treatment side effects (\[TSE\], 4 items), disease symptoms (disease effects scale \[DES\], 4 items), and infection (4 items) - and single-item scales (social activities \[Social Problems (SP) Scale\] and future health worries \[Future Health (FH) Scale\]). These are measured on a four-point Likert scale, where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. These scores are transformed to give a rating from 0 - 100, where 0 = no symptoms or problems and 100 = severe symptoms or problems. Changes from Baseline were analyzed by a mixed model-repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFrom randomization until the end of the study (up to 47 months)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a self-reported, 30-item cancer-specific instrument that assesses 15 domains: physical functioning (5 items), role functioning (2 items), emotional functioning (4 items), cognitive functioning (2 items), social functioning (2 items), pain (2 items), fatigue (3 items), nausea and vomiting (2 items), five single-item symptom scores (insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, diarrhea, and dyspnea), a single item asking about financial difficulties, and global health status/quality of life (QOF) consisting of 2 items. Functional and symptoms scales were measured on a four-point Likert scale, where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much, whereas global health status or QOF was assessed using a 7-item Likert scale, ranging from "poor" (worse quality of life) to "excellent" (better quality of life). Changes from Baseline were analyzed by mixed model-repeated measures ANCOVA.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Quality of Life Status as Assessed by the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) ScaleFrom screening until the end of the study (up to 47 months)
EQ-5D is comprised of a 5-item health status measure and a visual analogue scale (VAS) and is used to generate two scores: the utility score and the thermometer score. The utility score measures mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Responses to each of the 5 health states are measured on a 3-point scale (level 1 = no problem; level 2 = some or moderate problem\[s\] and level 3 = unable, or extreme problems). Responses are typically converted into health utilities or valuations on a scale ranging from 0 (worst health) to 1 (perfect health). The thermometer score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Changes from Baseline were analyzed by mixed model-repeated measures ANCOVA. A negative adjusted mean change from Baseline represents a worsening of quality of life.

Outcomes27

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-free Survival, as Assessed by the InvestigatorFrom randomization until progression or death (up to 79 months)Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all participants who were randomized in the study.MonthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYProgression-free Survival, as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)From randomization until progression or death (up to 79 months)Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all participants who were randomized in the study.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall SurvivalFrom randomization until death (up to 88 months)ITT PopulationMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Improvement in Response From BaselineFrom Baseline until the end of the study (up to 88 months)ITT Population. Only participants who had PR at study entry were analyzed.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to Next TherapyFrom randomization until the end of the study (up to 88 months)ITT PopulationMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYProgression-free Survival After Next-line TherapyFrom randomization until progression or death (up to 88 months)ITT Population. Only participants who received next-line therapy and subjects who died prior to receiving next-line therapy were analyzed.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to Progression After Next-line TherapyFrom randomization until progression or death (up to 88 months)
ITT Population. Only participants who received next-line therapy and who also had PD prior to next line therapy were analysed. Participants who died prior to next-line therapy were also included for analysis.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline (BL) in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)From randomization until the end of the study (up to 47 months)ITT PopulationScores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFrom randomization until the end of the study (up to 47 months)ITT PopulationScores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Quality of Life Status as Assessed by the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) ScaleFrom screening until the end of the study (up to 47 months)ITT PopulationScores on a scaleMEAN

Results by group831

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-free Survival, as Assessed by the InvestigatorOfatumumab34.1795% Confidence Interval 29.70 to 38.01Months
Progression-free Survival, as Assessed by the InvestigatorObservation16.8995% Confidence Interval 12.98 to 20.37Months
Progression-free Survival, as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)Ofatumumab33.7495% Confidence Interval 28.35 to 38.01Months
Progression-free Survival, as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)Observation14.9895% Confidence Interval 11.63 to 19.12Months
Overall SurvivalOfatumumabNA95% Confidence Interval 68.96 to NAMonths
Overall SurvivalObservation73.6395% Confidence Interval 66.53 to NAMonths
Number of Participants With Improvement in Response From BaselineOfatumumab16Participants
Number of Participants With Improvement in Response From BaselineObservation8Participants
Time to Next TherapyOfatumumab36.2195% Confidence Interval 30.49 to 41.40Months
Time to Next TherapyObservation27.5695% Confidence Interval 23.49 to 32.49Months

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDOfatumumab240
Overall StudySTARTEDObservation240
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOfatumumab110
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDObservation114
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOfatumumab130
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDObservation126

Adverse events1,002

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersOfatumumab61239
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersObservation22241
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTotal83480
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersOfatumumab13239
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersObservation11241
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTotal24480
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersOfatumumab13239
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersObservation11241
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersTotal24480
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersOfatumumab41239

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityOfatumumab88239
Total, all-cause mortalityObservation87241
Total, all-cause mortalityTotal175480
Total, other adverse eventsOfatumumab202239
Total, other adverse eventsObservation139241
Total, other adverse eventsTotal341480
Total, serious adverse eventsOfatumumab120239
Total, serious adverse eventsObservation120241
Total, serious adverse eventsTotal240480

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Ofatumumab vs Observation: Number of Participants Who Received at Least One Transfusion During the StudyTrial comparisons
Ofatumumab vs Observation: Number of Participants With Improvement in Response From BaselineTrial comparisons
Ofatumumab vs Observation: Number of Participants With Grade 3 and Above Adverse Event of InfectionTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01039376

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01039376/registered?page=2