ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01053156

Trial of Minocycline to Treat Children With Fragile X Syndrome

NCT01053156, Not applicable, Completed, University of California, Davis; results first posted 2014-07-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Trial of Minocycline to Treat Children With Fragile X Syndrome. Trials, record NCT01053156. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01053156

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Trial of Minocycline to Treat Children With Fragile X Syndrome
NCT number
NCT01053156
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
66 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of California, Davis
Conditions
Fragile X Syndrome
Interventions
minocycline hydrochloride, Placebo
First posted
2010-01-21
Last updated
2017-05-30
Results first posted
2014-07-30
Limitations and caveats
Results may be potentially biased by study design weaknesses, including unblinding of subjects when they completed the study, drug-related side effects unblinding and preliminary efficacy analysis results known to investigators.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryClinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)3 months (post first treatment) and 6 months (post second treatment)
The CGI-I utilizes history from primary caregivers and incorporates it into a seven step clinical rating for follow up throughout treatment, from 1 "very much improved" to 7 "very much worse". Lower scores indicate more improvement. Scores were obtained post treatments. Scores from when the patients were on minocycline either first or second were combined and averaged to determine a least squares mean and placebo scores were obtained in the same manner.
PrimaryVisual Analogue Scale- Behavior 1Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
A VAS is used to represent a caregiver's assessment of given behaviors, which were chosen by the parents. Caregivers marked a 10 cm horizontal line representing a visual continuum of each behavior from "worst behavior" to "behavior not a problem." Greater values indicate greater improvement. This measure represents the first behavior that the caregivers noted, out of three.
SecondaryVisual Analogue Scale- Behaviors 2Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
A VAS is used to represent a caregiver's assessment of given behaviors, which were chosen by the parents. Caregivers marked a 10 cm horizontal line representing a visual continuum of each behavior from "worst behavior" to "behavior not a problem." Greater values indicate greater improvement. This measure represents the second behavior that the caregivers noted, out of three.
SecondaryExpressive Vocabulary Test-2Baseline, 3 months and 6 months
The EVT-2 standard score assesses language development through a participant's one word synonym response to visual stimuli. Standard scores range from 20-160. A standard score of 100 is average, with a 15 point standard deviation. Higher values represent a better outcome.
SecondaryVineland Adaptive Behavior Scale-II (VABS-II)Adaptive Behavior Composite ScoreBaseline, 3 months, and 6 months
The VABS-II Adaptive Behavior Composite Score was used to assess adaptive skills. An Adaptive Behavior Composite Score may range from 20-160 with an average of 100 with a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores show improvement.
SecondaryAberrant Behavior Checklist-Community Edition (ABC-C)Composite ScoreBaseline, 3 months, and 6 months
The ABC-C composite scores were used to quantify the severity of a patient's behaviors. A composite score consists of subscale scores including Irritability and Agitation, Lethargy and Social Withdrawal, Stereotypic Behavior, Hyperactivity and Noncompliance, and Inappropriate Speech. The composite score may range from 0-174. Lower scores indicate improvement.
SecondaryVisual Analogue Scale Behavior 3- VAS3Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
A VAS is used to represent a caregiver's assessment of given behaviors, which were chosen by the parents. Caregivers marked a 10 cm horizontal line representing a visual continuum of each behavior from "worst behavior" to "behavior not a problem." Greater values indicate greater improvement. This measure represents the third behavior that caregivers noted, out of three.
SecondaryVAS Categorized by Behavior: Aggression/ ADHDBaseline, 3 months, 6 months
A VAS is used to represent a caregiver's assessment of given behaviors, which were chosen by the parents. Caregivers marked a 10 cm horizontal line representing a visual continuum of each behavior from "worst behavior" to "behavior not a problem." Greater values indicate greater improvement. This measure represents the least squares mean of all behaviors having to do with aggression or ADHD behaviors.
SecondaryVAS Categorized by Behavior:Anxiety/ MoodBaseline, 3 months, 6 months
A VAS is used to represent a caregiver's assessment of given behaviors, which were chosen by the parents. Caregivers marked a 10 cm horizontal line representing a visual continuum of each behavior from "worst behavior" to "behavior not a problem." Greater values indicate greater improvement. This measure represents the least squares mean of all behaviors having to do with anxiety or mood related behaviors.
SecondaryVAS Categorized by Behavior:Language/ CognitionBaseline, 3 months, 6 months
A VAS is used to represent a caregiver's assessment of given behaviors, which were chosen by the parents. Caregivers marked a 10 cm horizontal line representing a visual continuum of each behavior from "worst behavior" to "behavior not a problem." Greater values indicate greater improvement. This measure represents the least squares mean of all behaviors having to do with language or cognitive symptoms.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYClinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)3 months (post first treatment) and 6 months (post second treatment)Any participant who completed at least the first arm of the trial were included in the intention to treat analysisunits on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYVisual Analogue Scale- Behavior 1Baseline, 3 months, 6 monthsAny participant who completed at least the first arm of the trial were included in the intention to treat analysisunits on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYVisual Analogue Scale- Behaviors 2Baseline, 3 months, 6 monthsunits on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYExpressive Vocabulary Test-2Baseline, 3 months and 6 monthsunits on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYVineland Adaptive Behavior Scale-II (VABS-II)Adaptive Behavior Composite ScoreBaseline, 3 months, and 6 monthsunits on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAberrant Behavior Checklist-Community Edition (ABC-C)Composite ScoreBaseline, 3 months, and 6 monthsunits on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYVisual Analogue Scale Behavior 3- VAS3Baseline, 3 months, 6 monthsThis behavior was not provided by all of the participating caregivers, and so the number is less than the participants analyzed for other measures.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYVAS Categorized by Behavior: Aggression/ ADHDBaseline, 3 months, 6 months
In this ad hoc analysis, the various behaviors captured on the VAS were categorized and any behaviors regarding ADHD or Aggression symptoms were placed into this category. As not every caregiver named a behavior related to ADHD or aggression, this number is less than the number of participants.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYVAS Categorized by Behavior:Anxiety/ MoodBaseline, 3 months, 6 months
In this ad hoc analysis, the various behaviors captured on the VAS were categorized and any behaviors regarding anxiety or mood symptoms were placed into this category. As not every caregiver named a behavior related to anxiety or mood, this number is less than the number of participants.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYVAS Categorized by Behavior:Language/ CognitionBaseline, 3 months, 6 months
In this ad hoc analysis, the various behaviors captured on the VAS were categorized and any behaviors regarding language or cognition symptoms were placed into this category. As not every caregiver named a behavior related to language or cognition, this number is less than the number of participants.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group32

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)Minocycline2.49Standard Error 0.13units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)Placebo2.97Standard Error 0.13units on a scale
Visual Analogue Scale- Behavior 1Baseline2.28Standard Error 0.21units on a scale
Visual Analogue Scale- Behavior 1Minocycline4.60Standard Error 0.31units on a scale
Visual Analogue Scale- Behavior 1Placebo4.44Standard Error 0.30units on a scale
Visual Analogue Scale- Behaviors 2Baseline2.62Standard Error 0.23units on a scale
Visual Analogue Scale- Behaviors 2Minocycline4.91Standard Error 0.31units on a scale
Visual Analogue Scale- Behaviors 2Placebo4.16Standard Error 0.29units on a scale
Expressive Vocabulary Test-2Baseline65.92Standard Error 3.61units on a scale
Expressive Vocabulary Test-2Minocycline68.86Standard Error 1.28units on a scale

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
First Intervention (Week 1-12)STARTEDMinocycline First, Then Placebo Second33
First Intervention (Week 1-12)STARTEDPlacebo First, Minocycline Second33
First Intervention (Week 1-12)COMPLETEDMinocycline First, Then Placebo Second28
First Intervention (Week 1-12)COMPLETEDPlacebo First, Minocycline Second27
First Intervention (Week 1-12)NOT COMPLETEDMinocycline First, Then Placebo Second5
First Intervention (Week 1-12)NOT COMPLETEDPlacebo First, Minocycline Second6
Second Intervention (Week 13-24)STARTEDMinocycline First, Then Placebo Second28
Second Intervention (Week 13-24)STARTEDPlacebo First, Minocycline Second27
Second Intervention (Week 13-24)COMPLETEDMinocycline First, Then Placebo Second26
Second Intervention (Week 13-24)COMPLETEDPlacebo First, Minocycline Second22

Adverse events18

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersMinocycline156615
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo156615
otherGI Upset/ Vomiting/Loss of AppetiteGastrointestinal disordersMinocycline9669
otherGI Upset/ Vomiting/Loss of AppetiteGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo156615
otherSkin Rash/ Itching/ SwellingSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersMinocycline126612
otherSkin Rash/ Itching/ SwellingSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersPlacebo7667
otherFever/Chills/URI/Sore ThroatRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersMinocycline6666
otherFever/Chills/URI/Sore ThroatRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersPlacebo116611
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersMinocycline4664
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo5665

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityMinocycline
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsMinocycline5366
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo5366
Total, serious adverse eventsMinocycline066
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo166

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
18835858BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Minocycline vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01053156

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01053156/results?page=2