ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01059630

A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Bendamustine Compared With Bendamustine+Obinutuzumab (GA101) in Participants With Rituximab-Refractory, Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (GADOLIN)

NCT01059630, Phase 3, Completed, Genentech, Inc.; results first posted 2016-11-17

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Bendamustine Compared With Bendamustine+Obinutuzumab (GA101) in Participants With Rituximab-Refractory, Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (GADOLIN). Trials, record NCT01059630. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01059630

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Bendamustine Compared With Bendamustine+Obinutuzumab (GA101) in Participants With Rituximab-Refractory, Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (GADOLIN)
NCT number
NCT01059630
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
413 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Genentech, Inc.
Conditions
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Interventions
Obinutuzumab, Bendamustine
First posted
2010-02-01
Last updated
2020-01-13
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2009-015504-25
Results first posted
2016-11-17

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes33

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Progressive Disease (PD) as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) or Death
Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cycle [Cy] 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1, then every 3 months up to 2 years and every 6 months for next 2 years [up to 4.5 years overall])
PD was assessed by an IRC according to the modified response criteria for indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (iNHL) (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). PD was defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 centimeters (cm) in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50 percent (%) increase from nadir in the sum of product diameter (SPD) of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (example: splenic or hepatic nodules). To be considered PD, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of less than (\<) 1.0 cm must increase by greater than or equal to (≥) 50% and to a size of 1.5 multiplied by 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis; at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node greater than (\>) 1 cm in its short axis.
PrimaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by IRC
Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cy 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1, then every 3 months up to 2 years and every 6 months for next 2 years [up to 4.5 years overall])
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death as assessed by an IRC according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). PD was defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). To be PD, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of \<1.0 cm must increase by ≥ 50% and to a size of 1.5 multiplied by 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis; at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node \>1 cm in its short axis. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and 95% confidence interval (CI) for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by InvestigatorBaseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to 8.5 years overall))
PD was assessed by an investigator according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). PD was defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). To be considered PD, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of \<1.0 cm must increase by ≥ 50% and to a size of 1.5 multiplied by 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis; at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node \>1 cm in its short axis.
SecondaryPFS as Assessed by InvestigatorBaseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to 8.5 years overall)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD as assessed by an investigator according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007), or death from any cause on study. PD was defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). To be considered PD, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of \<1.0 cm must increase by ≥ 50% and to a size of 1.5 multiplied by 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis; at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node \>1 cm in its short axis. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Objective Response as Assessed by IRCBaseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)
Objective response was defined as having CR or PR as assessed according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Objective Response as Assessed by InvestigatorBaseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8.5 years)
Objective response was defined as having CR or PR as assessed according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by IRCBaseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)
BOR observed during assessment period according to modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease \& disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by baseline scan \& no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; with exception of splenic \& hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable \& no measurable disease should be present, SD: Failing to attain criteria needed for a CR/PR, but not fulfilling those for PD, PD: appearance of any new lesion \>1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in single involved node, or size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by InvestigatorBaseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8.5 years)
BOR: best response for a participant, observed during assessment period according to modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; with exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present, SD: Failing to attain the criteria needed for a CR or PR, but not fulfilling those for PD, PD: appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With BOR at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by IRCBaseline until end of induction treatment (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cy 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1)
BOR observed during assessment period according to modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease \& disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan \& no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen; with exception of splenic \& hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable \& no measurable disease should be present, SD: Failing to attain criteria needed for a CR/PR, but not fulfilling those for PD, PD: appearance of any new lesion \>1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or size of other lesions (e.g., splenic/hepatic nodules). IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With BOR at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by InvestigatorBaseline until end of induction treatment (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cy 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1)
BOR: best response for a participant, observed during assessment period according to modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; with exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present, SD: Failing to attain criteria needed for a CR or PR, but not fulfilling those for PD, PD: appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules).

Outcomes33

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Progressive Disease (PD) as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) or Death
Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cycle [Cy] 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1, then every 3 months up to 2 years and every 6 months for next 2 years [up to 4.5 years overall])
ITT population.participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYProgression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by IRC
Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cy 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1, then every 3 months up to 2 years and every 6 months for next 2 years [up to 4.5 years overall])
ITT population.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by InvestigatorBaseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to 8.5 years overall))ITT population.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPFS as Assessed by InvestigatorBaseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to 8.5 years overall)ITT population.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Objective Response as Assessed by IRCBaseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)ITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed signified those participants who had at least one post-baseline assessment.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Objective Response as Assessed by InvestigatorBaseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8.5 years)ITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed signified those participants who had at least one post-baseline assessment.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by IRCBaseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)ITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed signified those participants who had at least one post-baseline assessment.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by InvestigatorBaseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8.5 years)ITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed signified those participants who had at least one post-baseline assessment.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With BOR at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by IRCBaseline until end of induction treatment (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cy 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1)ITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed signified those participants who had reached the end of induction treatment response assessment.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With BOR at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by InvestigatorBaseline until end of induction treatment (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cy 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1)ITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed signified those participants who had reached the end of induction treatment response assessment.percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group514

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Progressive Disease (PD) as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) or DeathBendamustine Alone125participants
Number of Participants With Progressive Disease (PD) as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) or DeathObinutuzumab + Bendamustine87participants
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by IRCBendamustine Alone14.195% Confidence Interval 11.7 to 16.6months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by IRCObinutuzumab + Bendamustine29.295% Confidence Interval 20.5 to NAmonths
Number of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by InvestigatorBendamustine Alone152participants
Number of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by InvestigatorObinutuzumab + Bendamustine132participants
PFS as Assessed by InvestigatorBendamustine Alone14.195% Confidence Interval 12.6 to 16.2months
PFS as Assessed by InvestigatorObinutuzumab + Bendamustine25.895% Confidence Interval 20.1 to 36.5months
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response as Assessed by IRCBendamustine Alone77.595% Confidence Interval 71.24 to 82.98percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response as Assessed by IRCObinutuzumab + Bendamustine75.595% Confidence Interval 69.00 to 81.23percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBendamustine Alone209
Overall StudySTARTEDObinutuzumab + Bendamustine204
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBendamustine Alone82
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDObinutuzumab + Bendamustine101
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBendamustine Alone127
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDObinutuzumab + Bendamustine103

Adverse events382

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersBendamustine Alone3420341
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersObinutuzumab + Bendamustine2320436
otherNEUTROPENIABlood and lymphatic system disordersBendamustine Alone59203103
otherNEUTROPENIABlood and lymphatic system disordersObinutuzumab + Bendamustine74204150
otherTHROMBOCYTOPENIABlood and lymphatic system disordersBendamustine Alone50203101
otherTHROMBOCYTOPENIABlood and lymphatic system disordersObinutuzumab + Bendamustine2620454
otherABDOMINAL DISTENSIONGastrointestinal disordersBendamustine Alone1120312
otherABDOMINAL DISTENSIONGastrointestinal disordersObinutuzumab + Bendamustine62046
otherABDOMINAL PAINGastrointestinal disordersBendamustine Alone2020323
otherABDOMINAL PAINGastrointestinal disordersObinutuzumab + Bendamustine1620418

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBendamustine Alone
Total, all-cause mortalityObinutuzumab + Bendamustine
Total, other adverse eventsBendamustine Alone194203
Total, other adverse eventsObinutuzumab + Bendamustine200204
Total, serious adverse eventsBendamustine Alone76203
Total, serious adverse eventsObinutuzumab + Bendamustine91204

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
27345636DERIVEDPubMed
29584548DERIVEDPubMed
31050355DERIVEDPubMed
31462735DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Bendamustine Alone vs Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine: Number of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by InvestigatorTrial comparisons
Bendamustine Alone vs Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine: Number of Participants With Progressive Disease (PD) as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) or DeathTrial comparisons
Bendamustine Alone vs Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01059630

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01059630/registered?page=2