ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01061736

Evaluation of Sarilumab (SAR153191/REGN88) on Top of Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

NCT01061736, Phase 2, Phase 3, Completed, Sanofi; results first posted 2017-06-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Evaluation of Sarilumab (SAR153191/REGN88) on Top of Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. Trials, record NCT01061736. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01061736

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Evaluation of Sarilumab (SAR153191/REGN88) on Top of Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
NCT number
NCT01061736
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
1,675 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Sanofi
Conditions
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Interventions
Sarilumab, Placebo (for sarilumab), Methotrexate, Folic Acid
First posted
2010-02-03
Last updated
2017-06-28
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2009-016266-90
Results first posted
2017-06-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPart A: Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12Baseline to Week 12
ACR20 response was defined, based on guidelines set forth by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), as ≥20 % improvement in tender joint count and swollen joint count as well as ≥20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 following measures: C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Participant assessment of pain; Participant's global assessment of disease activity; Physician global assessment of disease activity; and Health Assessment Question-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Missing data imputed by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF).
PrimaryPart B: Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 24Baseline to Week 24
ACR20 improvement responses were determined without imputation of missing post-baseline values. In addition data collected after treatment discontinuation or rescue was set to missing. Responder status was determined if possible. With these rules, participants automatically became non-responders for all time points beyond the time point they started rescue treatment or discontinued study treatment.
PrimaryPart B: Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Question Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 16Baseline, Week 16
HAQ-DI was a participant-reported questionnaire that assesses the difficulty of performing daily activities: dress/groom, arise, eat, walk, reach, grip, hygiene and common activities. Overall score range from 0=least difficulty to 3=extreme difficulty. An increase in the score indicates a worsening of physical function while a decrease in the score represents improvement. Data collected after treatment discontinuation was set to missing.
PrimaryPart B: Change From Baseline in Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
The Sharp method modified by D. van der Heijde involves separate scores for erosions and joint space narrowing based on radiographs to assess the degree of structural damage. Total score range from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst possible total score). An increase in total score represents progression of structural damage. Missing data were imputed by the linear extrapolation method.
SecondaryPart B: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Major Clinical Response at Week 52Baseline up to Week 52
Major clinical response was defined as an ACR70 response maintained for at least 24 consecutive weeks. ACR70 response uses the same criteria as for ACR20 but requires 70% improvement. In the primary approach, data collected after treatment discontinuation or rescue was set to missing. No imputation of missing post-baseline values was performed. Responder status was determined if possible. With these rules, participants automatically became non-responders for all time points beyond the time point they started rescue treatment or discontinued study treatment.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPart A: Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12Baseline to Week 12Part A Intent-to-treat (ITT) population defined as all randomized participants.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPart B: Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 24Baseline to Week 24ITT population which included all participants randomized after dose selection (cohort 2).Percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPart B: Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Question Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 16Baseline, Week 16Cohort 2 ITT population only and included participants with available data of HAQ-DI at baseline and on or before Week 16.units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYPart B: Change From Baseline in Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52Cohort 2 ITT population and included participants with available data of mTSS at baseline and on or before Week 52.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPart B: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Major Clinical Response at Week 52Baseline up to Week 52ITT population which included all participants randomized after dose selection (cohort 2).Percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group30

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Part A: Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12Part A: SAR 100 mg qw62Percentage of participants
Part A: Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12Part A: SAR 150 mg qw72Percentage of participants
Part A: Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12Part A: SAR 100 mg q2w49Percentage of participants
Part A: Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12Part A: SAR 150 mg q2w66.7Percentage of participants
Part A: Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12Part A: SAR 200 mg q2w65.4Percentage of participants
Part A: Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12Part A: Placebo qw46.2Percentage of participants
Part B: Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 24Part B: SAR 150 mg q2w58Percentage of participants
Part B: Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 24Part B: SAR 200 mg q2w66.4Percentage of participants
Part B: Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 24Part B: Placebo q2w33.4Percentage of participants
Part B: Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Question Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 16Part B: SAR 150 mg q2wBaseline1.63Standard Deviation 0.63units on a scale

Participant flow50

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPart A: SAR 100 mg qw50
Overall StudySTARTEDPart A: SAR 150 mg qw50
Overall StudySTARTEDPart A: SAR 100 mg q2w51
Overall StudySTARTEDPart A: SAR 150 mg q2w51
Overall StudySTARTEDPart A: SAR 200 mg q2w52
Overall StudySTARTEDPart A: Placebo qw52
Overall StudySTARTEDPart B Cohort 1: Non-selected Doses84
Overall StudySTARTEDPart B: SAR 150 mg q2w (Cohort 1 [Selected Dose]+Cohort 2)430
Overall StudySTARTEDPart B: SAR 200 mg q2w (Cohort 1 [Selected Dose]+Cohort 2)427
Overall StudySTARTEDPart B: Placebo q2w (Cohort 1[Selected Dose]+Cohort 2)428

Adverse events1,846

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart A: SAR 100 mg qw650
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart A: SAR 150 mg qw550
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart A: SAR 100 mg q2w051
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart A: SAR 150 mg q2w152
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart A: SAR 200 mg q2w1051
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart A: Placebo qw051
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart B: SAR 100 mg qw Cohort 1 (Non-selected Dose)129
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart B: SAR 150 mg qw Cohort 1 (Non-selected Dose)226
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart B: SAR 100 mg q2w Cohort 1 (Non-selected Dose)129
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart B: SAR 150 mg q2w (Cohort 1[Selected Dose]+Cohort 2)36370

Adverse event totals39

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPart A: SAR 100 mg qw
Total, all-cause mortalityPart A: SAR 150 mg qw
Total, all-cause mortalityPart A: SAR 100 mg q2w
Total, all-cause mortalityPart A: SAR 150 mg q2w
Total, all-cause mortalityPart A: SAR 200 mg q2w
Total, all-cause mortalityPart A: Placebo qw
Total, all-cause mortalityPart B: SAR 100 mg qw Cohort 1 (Non-selected Dose)
Total, all-cause mortalityPart B: SAR 150 mg qw Cohort 1 (Non-selected Dose)
Total, all-cause mortalityPart B: SAR 100 mg q2w Cohort 1 (Non-selected Dose)
Total, all-cause mortalityPart B: SAR 150 mg q2w (Cohort 1[Selected Dose]+Cohort 2)

Papers12

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
24297381RESULTPubMed
25733246RESULTPubMed
27600829BACKGROUNDPubMed
27716324DERIVEDPubMed
31004324DERIVEDPubMed
31452928DERIVEDPubMed
32343882DERIVEDPubMed
32522251DERIVEDPubMed
32907617DERIVEDPubMed
34519964DERIVEDPubMed

1 to 10 of 12

See all 12 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01061736

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01061736/results?page=2