ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01063881

The Asia-Pacific Flexible Dose Study of Dapoxetine and Patient Satisfaction in Premature Ejaculation Therapy

NCT01063881, Phase 3, Completed, Janssen Research & Development, LLC; results first posted 2012-10-31

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. The Asia-Pacific Flexible Dose Study of Dapoxetine and Patient Satisfaction in Premature Ejaculation Therapy. Trials, record NCT01063881. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01063881

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
The Asia-Pacific Flexible Dose Study of Dapoxetine and Patient Satisfaction in Premature Ejaculation Therapy
NCT number
NCT01063881
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
285 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Conditions
Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological
Interventions
Dapoxetine
First posted
2010-02-05
Last updated
2024-11-19
Results first posted
2012-10-31
Limitations and caveats
Subgroup by dosage was categorized based on dose-titration patterns observed during the course of the treatment period. Patients were not randomized to treatment by dosage group, disease type, or Intravaginal Ejaculation Latency Time.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryThe Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least "Slightly Better" in Response to Dapoxetine TreatmentWeek 12
The "Clinical Global Impression of Change" (CGIC), a patient-reported scale was used to assess the patient's improvement with premature ejaculation (PE) since initiating treatment with dapoxetine. Patients were asked: "Compared to the start of the study, would you describe your premature ejaculation (PE) problem as: Much worse, Worse, Slightly worse, No change, Slightly better, Better, or Much better?" The number of patients who described improvement with their PE of at least "slightly better" after 12 weeks of treatment with dapoxetine are provided in the table below.
SecondaryThe Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationBaseline and Week 12
The Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), a patient-reported outcome measure was used to rate the patient's level of control over intercourse on a 5-point scale. Patients were asked: "Over the past month, was your level of control over ejaculation Very poor, Poor, Fair, Good, or Very Good?" The number of patients who rated their level of control over ejaculation before treatment and after 12 weeks of treatment with dapoxetine are provided in the table below.
SecondaryThe Patient's Level of Satisfaction With IntercourseBaseline and Week 12
The Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), a patient-reported outcome measure was used to rate the patient's level of satisfaction with intercourse on a 5-point scale. Patients were asked: "Over the past month, was your satisfaction with sexual intercourse Very poor, Poor, Fair, Good, or Very Good?" The number of patients who rated their level of satisfaction with control over ejaculation at before treatment and after 12 weeks of treatment with dapoxetine are provided in the table below.
SecondaryThe Patient's Level of Personal Distress Related to the Speed of EjaculationBaseline and Week 12
The Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), a patient-reported outcome measure was used to rate the patient's level of distress related to the speed of ejaculation. Patient's were asked: "Over the past month, how distressed were you by how fast you ejaculated during sexual intercourse? Not at all, A little bit, Moderately, Quite a bit, Extremely." The number of patients who rated their level of personal distress related to the speed of ejaculation before treatment and after 12 weeks of treatment with dapoxetine are provided in the table below.
SecondaryThe Patient's Degree of Interpersonal Difficulty Related to the Speed of EjaculationBaseline and Week 12
The Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), a patient-reported outcome measure was used to rate the patient's level of interpersonal difficulty related to the speed of ejaculation. Patient's were asked: "Over the past month, to what extent did how fast you/your partner ejaculated during sexual intercourse cause difficulty in your relationship with your partner? Not at all, A little bit, Moderately, Quite a bit, or Extremely?" The number of patients who rated their level of interpersonal difficulty before treatment and after 12 weeks of treatment with dapoxetine are provided in the table below.
SecondaryPatient Responses to Improvement With Their Premature Ejaculation After 12 Weeks of Treatment With DapoxetineWeek 12
The "Clinical Global Impression of Change" (CGIC), a patient-reported scale was used to assess the patient's improvement with premature ejaculation (PE) since initiating treatment with dapoxetine. Patients were asked: "Compared to the start of the study, would you describe your premature ejaculation (PE) problem as: Much worse, Worse, Slightly worse, No change, Slightly better, Better, or Much better?" The number of patients reporting improvement in their PE by category of the CGIC scale after 12 weeks of treatment with dapoxetine are provided in the table below.
SecondaryThe Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least "Slightly Better" in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Dosage)Week 12
The "Clinical Global Impression of Change" (CGIC) was used to assess the patient's improvement with premature ejaculation (PE) since initiating treatment with dapoxetine. The data provided below represent the number of patients who reported at least a slightly better response to treatment by the dose of dapoxetine they received in the study. This was a single-arm, open-label, non-randomized study in which "subgroup by dosage" was categorized based on dose-titration patterns observed during the course of the treatment period.
SecondaryThe Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least "Slightly Better" in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Disease Type)Week 12
The "Clinical Global Impression of Change" (CGIC) was used to assess the patient's improvement with premature ejaculation (PE) since initiating treatment with dapoxetine. The data provided below represent the number of patients who reported at least a "slightly better" response to treatment when grouped by type of PE disease (patients with life-long PE and patients with acquired PE). This was a single-arm, open-label, non-randomized study where patients were categorized based their PE disease after enrollment in the study.
SecondaryThe Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least "Slightly Better" in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Intravaginal Ejaculation Latency Time [IELT])Week 12
The "Clinical Global Impression of Change" (CGIC) was used to assess the patient's improvement with premature ejaculation (PE) since initiating treatment with dapoxetine. The data provided below represent the number of patients who reported at least a "slightly better" response to treatment when grouped by intravaginal ejaculation latency time (patients with an IELT of \< 1 minute and patients with an IELT of \> 1 minute). This was a single-arm, open-label, non-randomized study where patients were categorized based on IELT after enrollment in the study.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYThe Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine TreatmentWeek 12The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who took at least one dose of study drug and completed at least one assessment of efficacy.PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationBaseline and Week 12The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who took at least one dose of study drug and completed at least one assessment of efficacy.PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Patient's Level of Satisfaction With IntercourseBaseline and Week 12The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who took at least one dose of study drug and completed at least one assessment of efficacy.PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Patient's Level of Personal Distress Related to the Speed of EjaculationBaseline and Week 12The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who took at least one dose of study drug and completed at least one assessment of efficacy.PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Patient's Degree of Interpersonal Difficulty Related to the Speed of EjaculationBaseline and Week 12The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who took at least one dose of study drug and completed at least one assessment of efficacy.PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPatient Responses to Improvement With Their Premature Ejaculation After 12 Weeks of Treatment With DapoxetineWeek 12The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who took at least one dose of study drug and completed at least one assessment of efficacy.PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Dosage)Week 12The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who took at least one dose of study drug and completed at least one assessment of efficacy.PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Disease Type)Week 12The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who took at least one dose of study drug and completed at least one assessment of efficacy.PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Intravaginal Ejaculation Latency Time [IELT])Week 12The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who took at least one dose of study drug and completed at least one assessment of efficacy.PatientsNUMBER

Results by group55

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
The Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine TreatmentDapoxetine (Week 12)228Patients
The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationDapoxetine (Baseline)Very poor120Patients
The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationDapoxetine (Week 12)Very poor22Patients
The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationDapoxetine (Baseline)Poor132Patients
The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationDapoxetine (Week 12)Poor57Patients
The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationDapoxetine (Baseline)Fair20Patients
The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationDapoxetine (Week 12)Fair77Patients
The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationDapoxetine (Baseline)Good2Patients
The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationDapoxetine (Week 12)Good101Patients
The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationDapoxetine (Baseline)Very good0Patients

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDDapoxetine 30 mg Only147
Overall StudySTARTEDDapoxetine 30 to 60 mg125
Overall StudySTARTEDDapoxetine 30 to 60 to 30 mg13
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDapoxetine 30 mg Only92
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDapoxetine 30 to 60 mg114
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDapoxetine 30 to 60 to 30 mg12
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDapoxetine 30 mg Only55
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDapoxetine 30 to 60 mg11
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDapoxetine 30 to 60 to 30 mg1

Adverse events189

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAtrial FibrillationCardiac disordersDepoxetine (DPX) 30 mg Only1144
otherAtrial FibrillationCardiac disordersDepoxetine (DPX) 30 to 60 mg0124
otherAtrial FibrillationCardiac disordersDepoxetine (DPX) 30 to 60 to 30 mg013
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersDepoxetine (DPX) 30 mg Only4144
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersDepoxetine (DPX) 30 to 60 mg3124
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersDepoxetine (DPX) 30 to 60 to 30 mg013
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersDepoxetine (DPX) 30 mg Only0144
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersDepoxetine (DPX) 30 to 60 mg0124
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersDepoxetine (DPX) 30 to 60 to 30 mg113
otherBlepharitisEye disordersDepoxetine (DPX) 30 mg Only0144

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDepoxetine (DPX) 30 mg Only
Total, all-cause mortalityDepoxetine (DPX) 30 to 60 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityDepoxetine (DPX) 30 to 60 to 30 mg
Total, other adverse eventsDepoxetine (DPX) 30 mg Only62144
Total, other adverse eventsDepoxetine (DPX) 30 to 60 mg57124
Total, other adverse eventsDepoxetine (DPX) 30 to 60 to 30 mg1213
Total, serious adverse eventsDepoxetine (DPX) 30 mg Only2144
Total, serious adverse eventsDepoxetine (DPX) 30 to 60 mg0124
Total, serious adverse eventsDepoxetine (DPX) 30 to 60 to 30 mg013

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01063881

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01063881/results?page=2