ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01066104

Subcutaneous Omalizumab for Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis

NCT01066104, Phase 2, Completed, Massachusetts General Hospital; results first posted 2017-05-19

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Subcutaneous Omalizumab for Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis. Trials, record NCT01066104. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01066104

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Subcutaneous Omalizumab for Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis
NCT number
NCT01066104
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
27 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Conditions
Chronic Rhinosinusitis, Nasal Polyps
Interventions
Xolair placebo, Xolair (omalizumab)
First posted
2010-02-10
Last updated
2017-06-14
Results first posted
2017-05-19

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryObjective (a) the Effect on Polypoid Mucosal Thickening in the Anterior Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses as Measured on Sinus CT Scan.4 months
Improvement is defined as any decrease in sinus CT scores at end of study. Quantification of polypoid mucosal thickening in the anterior ethmoid and maxillary sinuses on sinus CT scan (primary outcome variable): A sinus CT scan will be performed on Day 0 and repeated on Day 112. The CT scans will be performed with consistent orientation of the patient's head and landmarks to assure that both the pretreatment and posttreatment scans are done with identical orientation and sections. The CT scans will be scored using the established scoring system known as the Zinreich modification of the Lund Mackay scoring system.. As an exploratory measure, a 3-dimensional scoring system developed with the radiology department of Massachusetts General Hospital may also be used.
SecondaryObjective (b) the Effect on Volume of Polypoid Mucosal Tissue in the Nose and Sinuses on Rhinoscopic Examination.4 months
Improvement is defined as any reduction in the total nasal polyp score. Using rhinoscopic evaluation, Nasal Polyp Score will be assessed on the right and on the left, and added together. Scoring system: Score Definition 0 No polyps 1. Polyp in middle meatus, not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate 2. Polyp reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate but not touching the inferior turbinate 3. Polyp reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate and touching the inferior turbinate 4. Polyp reaching to or below the lower border of the inferior turbinate Range: minimum 0 (better outcome), maximum 8 (worse outcome)

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYObjective (a) the Effect on Polypoid Mucosal Thickening in the Anterior Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses as Measured on Sinus CT Scan.4 months% ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYObjective (b) the Effect on Volume of Polypoid Mucosal Tissue in the Nose and Sinuses on Rhinoscopic Examination.4 monthsChange in Total polyp scoreMEAN

Results by group4

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Objective (a) the Effect on Polypoid Mucosal Thickening in the Anterior Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses as Measured on Sinus CT Scan.Xolair Placebo-8.9Standard Deviation 28.2% Change
Objective (a) the Effect on Polypoid Mucosal Thickening in the Anterior Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses as Measured on Sinus CT Scan.Xolair (Omalizumab)4.2Standard Deviation 25.6% Change
Objective (b) the Effect on Volume of Polypoid Mucosal Tissue in the Nose and Sinuses on Rhinoscopic Examination.Xolair Placebo.05Standard Deviation 2.27Change in Total polyp score
Objective (b) the Effect on Volume of Polypoid Mucosal Tissue in the Nose and Sinuses on Rhinoscopic Examination.Xolair (Omalizumab)-0.33Standard Deviation 2.1Change in Total polyp score

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDXolair Placebo14
Overall StudySTARTEDXolair (Omalizumab)13
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDXolair Placebo12
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDXolair (Omalizumab)12
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDXolair Placebo2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDXolair (Omalizumab)1

Adverse events4

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHair thinningSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersXolair Placebo0140
otherHair thinningSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersXolair (Omalizumab)1131
otherBilateral hilar adenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersXolair Placebo1141
otherBilateral hilar adenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersXolair (Omalizumab)0130

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityXolair Placebo014
Total, all-cause mortalityXolair (Omalizumab)013
Total, other adverse eventsXolair Placebo114
Total, other adverse eventsXolair (Omalizumab)113
Total, serious adverse eventsXolair Placebo014
Total, serious adverse eventsXolair (Omalizumab)013

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Xolair (Omalizumab) vs Xolair Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Xolair (Omalizumab) vs Xolair Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01066104

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01066104/registered