ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01072929

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Armodafinil Treatment as Adjunctive Therapy in Adults With Major Depression Associated With Bipolar I Disorder

NCT01072929, Phase 3, Completed, Cephalon; results first posted 2015-01-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Armodafinil Treatment as Adjunctive Therapy in Adults With Major Depression Associated With Bipolar I Disorder. Trials, record NCT01072929. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01072929

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Armodafinil Treatment as Adjunctive Therapy in Adults With Major Depression Associated With Bipolar I Disorder
NCT number
NCT01072929
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
433 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Cephalon
Conditions
Depression
Interventions
Armodafinil, Placebo
First posted
2010-02-22
Last updated
2016-04-27
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2009-016667-11
Results first posted
2015-01-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes23

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Total Score From the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-Rated (IDS-C30)Day 0 (baseline), Week 8
The IDS-C30 is a standardized 30-item, clinician-rated scale to assess the severity of a participant's depressive symptoms. Every effort was made to have the same rater evaluate a participant across all visits. Total scores range from 0-84, with a score of 0 indicating no depression and a score of 84 indicating the most severe depression. Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement in the severity of depression.
SecondaryPercentage of Responders At Different Treatment Weeks According to the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-C30) Total ScoreDay 0 (baseline), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8, and last postbaseline observation (up to 8 weeks)
A responder is a participant with a ≥50% decrease or greater from baseline in the total score of the IDS-C30. The IDS-C30 is a standardized 30-item, clinician-rated scale to assess the severity of a participant's depressive symptoms. Every effort was made to have the same rater evaluate a participant across all visits. Total scores range from 0-84, with a score of 0 indicating no depression and a score of 84 indicating the most severe depression.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants in Remission At Different Treatment Weeks According to the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-C30) Total ScoreWeeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8, and last postbaseline observation (up to 8 weeks)
A participant in remission was defined as a participant with an IDS-C30 total score of 11 or less. The IDS-C30 is a standardized 30-item, clinician-rated scale to assess the severity of a participant's depressive symptoms. Every effort was made to have the same rater evaluate a participant across all visits. Total scores range from 0-84, with a score of 0 indicating no depression and a score of 84 indicating the most severe depression.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Different Treatment Weeks in the Total Score From the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-Rated (IDS-C30)Day 0 (baseline), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8, and last postbaseline observation (up to 8 weeks)
The IDS-C30 is a standardized 30-item, clinician-rated scale to assess the severity of a participant's depressive symptoms. Every effort was made to have the same rater evaluate a participant across all visits. Total scores range from 0-84, with a score of 0 indicating no depression and a score of 84 indicating the most severe depression. Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement in the severity of depression.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Different Treatment Weeks in the Total Score From the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-Rated (QIDS-C16)Day 0 (baseline), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8, and last postbaseline observation (up to 8 weeks)
The QIDS-C16 was derived from specified items in the IDS-C30, clinician-rated scale to assess the severity of a participant's depressive symptoms. Total scores range from 0-27, with a score of 0 indicating no depression and a score of 27 indicating the most severe depression. Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement in the severity of depression.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Different Treatment Weeks in the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) for DepressionDay 0 (baseline), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8, and last postbaseline observation (up to 8 weeks)
The CGI-S is an observer-rated scale that measures illness severity on a 7-point scale, with the severity of illness scale using a range of responses from 1 (normal) through to 7 (amongst the most severely ill patients). Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement in the severity of depression.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and Endpoint in the Global Assessment for Functioning (GAF) ScaleDay 0 (baseline), Weeks 4, 8, and last postbaseline observation (up to 8 weeks)
The Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) is a numeric scale (1 through 100) used by mental health clinicians and physicians to rate subjectively the social, occupational, and psychological functioning of adults, e.g., how well or adaptively one is meeting various problems-in-living. Ratings of 1 - 10 mean the participant is in persistent danger of severely hurting self or others (e.g., recurrent violence) or persistent inability to maintain minimal personal hygiene or serious suicidal act with clear expectation of death. Ratings of 91 - 100 indicate no symptoms, and the participant exhibits superior functioning in a wide range of activities, life's problems never seem to get out of hand, is sought out by others because of his or her many positive qualities. Positive change from baseline values indicate improvement in functioning.
SecondaryParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Day 1 to Week 9
AEs were graded by the investigator for severity on a three-point scale: mild, moderate and severe. Causality is graded as either related or not related. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in death, a life-threatening adverse event, hospitalization, a persistent or significant disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or an important medical event that may require medical intervention to prevent any of the previous results. Protocol-defined adverse events requiring expedited reporting included skin rash, hypersensitivity reaction, emergent suicidal ideation or suicide attempt, and psychosis.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total ScoreDay 0 (baseline), last postbaseline observation (up to 8 weeks)
The YMRS is a clinician-rated, 11-item checklist used to measure the severity of manic episodes. Information for assigning scores is gained from the participant's subjective reported symptoms over the previous 48 hours and from clinical observation during the interview. Seven items are ranked 0 through 4 and have descriptors associated with each severity level. Four items (irritability, speech, content, and disruptive-aggressive behavior) are scored 0 through 8 and have descriptors for every second increment. The total scale is 0-60. A score of ≤12 indicates remission of manic symptoms, and higher scores indicate greater severity of mania. Negative change from baseline scores indicate a decrease in severity of mania.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total ScoreDay 0 (baseline), last postbaseline observation (up to 8 weeks)
HAM-A measures the severity of anxiety symptoms. The scale consists of 14 items, each defined by a series of symptoms, and measures both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety). Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Negative change from baseline scores indicate a decrease in severity of anxiety.

Outcomes23

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Total Score From the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-Rated (IDS-C30)Day 0 (baseline), Week 8Full analysis set which includes participants who took 1 or more doses of study drug and who have at least 1 postbaseline IDS-C30 efficacy assessment.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Responders At Different Treatment Weeks According to the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-C30) Total ScoreDay 0 (baseline), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8, and last postbaseline observation (up to 8 weeks)
Full analysis set which includes participants who took 1 or more doses of study drug and who have at least 1 postbaseline IDS-C30 efficacy assessment. The denominator for calculating the percentages at each visit is the number of participants with a nonmissing value at that visit. Endpoint was the last observed postbaseline data.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants in Remission At Different Treatment Weeks According to the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-C30) Total ScoreWeeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8, and last postbaseline observation (up to 8 weeks)
Full analysis set which includes participants who took 1 or more doses of study drug and who have at least 1 postbaseline IDS-C30 efficacy assessment. The denominator for calculating the percentages at each visit is the number of participants with a nonmissing value at that visit. Endpoint was the last observed postbaseline data.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Different Treatment Weeks in the Total Score From the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-Rated (IDS-C30)Day 0 (baseline), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8, and last postbaseline observation (up to 8 weeks)
Full analysis set which includes participants who took 1 or more doses of study drug and who have at least 1 postbaseline IDS-C30 efficacy assessment. Participants are included in the analysis at each timepoint if they have a nonmissing value at that visit. Endpoint for analyses was the last observed postbaseline data.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Different Treatment Weeks in the Total Score From the 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-Rated (QIDS-C16)Day 0 (baseline), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8, and last postbaseline observation (up to 8 weeks)
Full analysis set which includes participants who took 1 or more doses of study drug and who have at least 1 postbaseline IDS-C30 efficacy assessment. The number of participants at each visit are those with a nonmissing value at that visit. Endpoint was the last observed postbaseline data.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Different Treatment Weeks in the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) for DepressionDay 0 (baseline), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8, and last postbaseline observation (up to 8 weeks)
Full analysis set which includes participants who took 1 or more doses of study drug and who have at least 1 postbaseline IDS-C30 efficacy assessment. The number of participants is those with a nonmissing value at that visit. Endpoint was the last observed postbaseline data.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and Endpoint in the Global Assessment for Functioning (GAF) ScaleDay 0 (baseline), Weeks 4, 8, and last postbaseline observation (up to 8 weeks)
Full analysis set which includes participants who took 1 or more doses of study drug and who have at least 1 postbaseline IDS-C30 efficacy assessment. The number of participants is those with a nonmissing value at that visit. Endpoint was the last observed postbaseline data.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Day 1 to Week 9The safety analysis set includes randomized participants who took 1 or more doses of study drug.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total ScoreDay 0 (baseline), last postbaseline observation (up to 8 weeks)The safety analysis set includes randomized participants who took 1 or more doses of study drug. The number analyzed includes participants with both baseline and during treatment assessments.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total ScoreDay 0 (baseline), last postbaseline observation (up to 8 weeks)The safety analysis set includes randomized participants who took 1 or more doses of study drug. The number analyzed includes participants with both baseline and during treatment assessments.units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group399

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Total Score From the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-Rated (IDS-C30)Placebo-17.9Standard Error 1.10units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Total Score From the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-Rated (IDS-C30)Armodafinil 150 mg/Day-21.7Standard Error 1.11units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Total Score From the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-Rated (IDS-C30)All Armodafinil-20.8Standard Error 1.07units on a scale
Percentage of Responders At Different Treatment Weeks According to the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-C30) Total ScorePlaceboWeek 1 (191, 193, 29)4percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders At Different Treatment Weeks According to the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-C30) Total ScoreArmodafinil 150 mg/DayWeek 1 (191, 193, 29)6percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders At Different Treatment Weeks According to the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-C30) Total ScoreArmodafinil 200 mg/DayWeek 1 (191, 193, 29)10percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders At Different Treatment Weeks According to the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-C30) Total ScorePlaceboWeek 2 (188, 181, 27)12percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders At Different Treatment Weeks According to the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-C30) Total ScoreArmodafinil 150 mg/DayWeek 2 (188, 181, 27)8percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders At Different Treatment Weeks According to the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-C30) Total ScoreArmodafinil 200 mg/DayWeek 2 (188, 181, 27)26percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders At Different Treatment Weeks According to the 30-Item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-C30) Total ScorePlaceboWeek 4 (178, 168, 27)23percentage of participants

Participant flow15

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo199
Overall StudySTARTEDArmodafinil 150 mg/Day201
Overall StudySTARTEDArmodafinil 200 mg/Day33
Overall StudySafety PopulationPlacebo199
Overall StudySafety PopulationArmodafinil 150 mg/Day198
Overall StudySafety PopulationArmodafinil 200 mg/Day32
Overall StudyFull Analysis PopulationPlacebo196
Overall StudyFull Analysis PopulationArmodafinil 150 mg/Day197
Overall StudyFull Analysis PopulationArmodafinil 200 mg/Day31
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo155

Adverse events51

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersARMODAFINIL 150 MG1719818
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersARMODAFINIL 200 MG2323
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPLACEBO1319913
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersARMODAFINIL 150 MG1119813
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersARMODAFINIL 200 MG3323
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPLACEBO919911
otherFeeling jitteryGeneral disordersARMODAFINIL 150 MG11981
otherFeeling jitteryGeneral disordersARMODAFINIL 200 MG2322
otherFeeling jitteryGeneral disordersPLACEBO11991
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersARMODAFINIL 150 MG1919827

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityARMODAFINIL 150 MG
Total, all-cause mortalityARMODAFINIL 200 MG
Total, all-cause mortalityPLACEBO
Total, other adverse eventsARMODAFINIL 150 MG41198
Total, other adverse eventsARMODAFINIL 200 MG1532
Total, other adverse eventsPLACEBO44199
Total, serious adverse eventsARMODAFINIL 150 MG3198
Total, serious adverse eventsARMODAFINIL 200 MG232
Total, serious adverse eventsPLACEBO5199

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
25099397RESULT

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01072929

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01072929/registered?page=2