ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01074307

A Prospective, Open-labeled, Multi-centric Trial in Subjects With Systolic Heart Failure to Evaluate Bisoprolol Treatment for the Effects on Surrogate Markers of Heart Failure in Korea

NCT01074307, Phase 4, Completed, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; results first posted 2014-02-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Prospective, Open-labeled, Multi-centric Trial in Subjects With Systolic Heart Failure to Evaluate Bisoprolol Treatment for the Effects on Surrogate Markers of Heart Failure in Korea. Trials, record NCT01074307. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01074307

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Prospective, Open-labeled, Multi-centric Trial in Subjects With Systolic Heart Failure to Evaluate Bisoprolol Treatment for the Effects on Surrogate Markers of Heart Failure in Korea
NCT number
NCT01074307
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
180 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Conditions
Heart Failure, Congestive
Interventions
Low Dose Bisoprolol, High Dose Bisoprolol
First posted
2010-02-24
Last updated
2014-02-14
Results first posted
2014-02-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a substance secreted from the ventricles or lower chambers of the heart in response to changes in pressure that occur when heart failure develops and worsens. The level of BNP in the blood increases when heart failure symptoms worsen, and decreases when the heart failure condition is stable. The BNP level in a person with heart failure is higher than in a person with normal heart function. The percent change of NT-pro BNP was calculated according to the formula: N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) reduction ratio = 100\*(Baseline NT-proBNP - Week 26 NT-proBNP)/Baseline NT-proBNP.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Classified as Class I to IV According to New York Heart Association (NYHA)Baseline and Week 26
New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification of heart failure: Class I: No limitation: ordinary physical exercise does not cause undue fatigue, dyspnea, or palpitations. Class II: Slight limitation of physical activity: comfortable at rest but ordinary activity results in fatigue, palpitations, or dyspnea. Class III: Marked limitation of physical activity: comfortable at rest but less than ordinary activity results in symptoms. Class IV: Unable to carry out any physical activity without discomfort: symptoms of heart failure are present even at rest with increased discomfort with any physical activity.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 6-minute Walking Test (6-MWT) Distance at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
6-minute Walking Test (6-MWT) distance was the distance that a participant could walk in 6 minutes. Participants were asked to perform the test at a pace that was comfortable to them, with as many breaks as they needed.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) at Week 26Baseline and Week 26LVEF was defined as the fraction of blood (in percent) pumped out of the heart's left ventricular chamber with each heart beat and it is used to measure the cardiac output for the heart.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Size at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
Left ventricle size was measured as systolic and diastolic Left Ventricular Internal Dimension (LVID). Diastolic dimension was measured of the left ventricle at the level of the chordae tendineae. The systolic dimension was measured as the smallest dimension between the left septal endocardium and the posterior wall endocardium during systole, whether or not the two walls were exactly apposed.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Were Re-hospitalized Due to Heart Failure and Who Died Due to Cardiovascular DisorderBaseline up to Week 26
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Baseline up to Week 26
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in the form of signs, symptoms, abnormal laboratory findings, or diseases that emerges or worsens relative to baseline during a clinical study with an Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP), regardless of causal relationship and even if no IMP has been administered.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Global Assessment of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) Score at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
Global assessment of CHF: The Investigator defined, graded, and recorded the participant's symptoms and signs by using a 6-point CHF scale ranging from 0 (unassessable), 1 (worsened), 2 (no change), 3 (mildly improved), 4 (moderately improved) and 5 (markedly improved).

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent Change From Baseline in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
ITT population included all the randomized participants who had at least one dose of the investigational product. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Classified as Class I to IV According to New York Heart Association (NYHA)Baseline and Week 26ITT population included all the randomized participants who had at least one dose of the investigational product.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in 6-minute Walking Test (6-MWT) Distance at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
ITT population included all the randomized participants who had at least one dose of the investigational product. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies number of participants who were evaluable for specified categories at different time points.
MeterMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
ITT population included all the randomized participants who had at least one dose of the investigational product. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies number of participants who were evaluable for specified categories at different time points.
Percent LVEFMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Size at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
ITT population included all the randomized participants who had at least one dose of the investigational product. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies number of participants who were evaluable for specified categories at different time points.
Milliliter LVIDMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Were Re-hospitalized Due to Heart Failure and Who Died Due to Cardiovascular DisorderBaseline up to Week 26ITT population included all the randomized participants who had at least one dose of the investigational product.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Baseline up to Week 26Safety analysis population included all the randomized participants who had at least one dose of the investigational product had post-dose safety data confirmed at least once by the Investigator.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Global Assessment of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) Score at Week 26Baseline and Week 26
ITT population included all the randomized participants who had at least one dose of the investigational product. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies number of participants who were evaluable for specified categories at different time points.
Units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group40

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percent Change From Baseline in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Week 26Low Dose Bisoprolol8.02Standard Deviation 113.78Percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Week 26High Dose Bisoprolol9.50Standard Deviation 117.56Percent change
Percentage of Participants Classified as Class I to IV According to New York Heart Association (NYHA)Low Dose BisoprololBaseline: Class II73.08Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Classified as Class I to IV According to New York Heart Association (NYHA)High Dose BisoprololBaseline: Class II74.77Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Classified as Class I to IV According to New York Heart Association (NYHA)Low Dose BisoprololBaseline: Class III25.00Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Classified as Class I to IV According to New York Heart Association (NYHA)High Dose BisoprololBaseline: Class III24.30Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Classified as Class I to IV According to New York Heart Association (NYHA)Low Dose BisoprololBaseline: Class IV1.92Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Classified as Class I to IV According to New York Heart Association (NYHA)High Dose BisoprololBaseline: Class IV0.93Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Classified as Class I to IV According to New York Heart Association (NYHA)Low Dose BisoprololWeek 26: Class I21.15Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Classified as Class I to IV According to New York Heart Association (NYHA)High Dose BisoprololWeek 26: Class I42.06Percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLow Dose Bisoprolol66
Overall StudySTARTEDHigh Dose Bisoprolol114
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLow Dose Bisoprolol44
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDHigh Dose Bisoprolol102
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLow Dose Bisoprolol22
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDHigh Dose Bisoprolol12

Adverse events68

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersLow Dose Bisoprolol866
otherDyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersHigh Dose Bisoprolol11114
otherDyspnoea exertionalRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersLow Dose Bisoprolol366
otherDyspnoea exertionalRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersHigh Dose Bisoprolol3114
otherCardiac failureCardiac disordersLow Dose Bisoprolol166
otherCardiac failureCardiac disordersHigh Dose Bisoprolol4114
otherHypotensionVascular disordersLow Dose Bisoprolol366
otherHypotensionVascular disordersHigh Dose Bisoprolol4114
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersLow Dose Bisoprolol066
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersHigh Dose Bisoprolol4114

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLow Dose Bisoprolol
Total, all-cause mortalityHigh Dose Bisoprolol
Total, other adverse eventsLow Dose Bisoprolol4566
Total, other adverse eventsHigh Dose Bisoprolol71114
Total, serious adverse eventsLow Dose Bisoprolol1666
Total, serious adverse eventsHigh Dose Bisoprolol9114

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Low Dose Bisoprolol vs High Dose Bisoprolol: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Trial comparisons
Low Dose Bisoprolol vs High Dose Bisoprolol: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01074307

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01074307/results?page=2