ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01078389

Effect of Febuxostat on Joint Damage in Hyperuricemic Subjects With Early Gout

NCT01078389, Phase 2, Completed, Takeda; results first posted 2014-09-10

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Effect of Febuxostat on Joint Damage in Hyperuricemic Subjects With Early Gout. Trials, record NCT01078389. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01078389

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Effect of Febuxostat on Joint Damage in Hyperuricemic Subjects With Early Gout
NCT number
NCT01078389
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
314 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Takeda
Conditions
Joint Damage
Interventions
Febuxostat, Placebo for Febuxostat
First posted
2010-03-02
Last updated
2014-09-10
Results first posted
2014-09-10

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Score of the Single Affected JointBaseline and Month 24
The single affected joint was defined as the joint with the history of the first acute gout flare. Radiographs (X-rays) of this single joint in the hands or feet were evaluated using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde method. Each erosion was assessed using a 4-point scale where 0=no erosions (best) to 3=large erosion passing the mid-line (worst). Individual erosion scores were summed to a maximum erosion score of 5 for joints in the hands and 10 for joints in the feet. Higher scores indicated more joint damage. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsBaseline and Month 24
Radiographs (X-rays) of 40 joints in the hands and 12 joints in the feet were evaluated using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde method. Each erosion was assessed using a 4-point scale where 0=no erosions (best) to 3=large erosion passing the mid-line (worst) for a total erosion score range of 0 to 320. Joint space narrowing (JSN) was assessed using a 5-point scale where 0=normal (best) to 4=absence of joint space, presumptive evidence of ankyloses, or complete luxation (worst) for a total JSN score range of 0 to 208. The Erosion Score and the JSN Score were combined for a total possible score of 0 to 528. Higher scores indicated more joint damage. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsBaseline and Month 24
Radiographs (X-rays) of 40 joints in the hands and 12 joints in the feet were evaluated using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde method. Each erosion was assessed using a 4-point scale where 0=no erosions (best) to 3=large erosion passing the mid-line (worst) for a total erosion score range of 0 to 320. Higher scores indicated more joint damage. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score of the Single Affected JointBaseline and Month 24
The single affected joint was defined as the joint with the history of the first acute gout flare. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was evaluated using the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Score (RAMRIS). Bone erosion in the proximal and distal location were each assessed in the affected joint using an 11-point scale where 0=no erosion (best) to 10=91-100% bone eroded (worst) for a bone erosion score range of 0 to 20. Bone marrow edema in the proximal and distal location were each assessed using a 4-point scale where 0=no edema (best) to 3=67-100% edema (worst) for a bone marrow edema (BME) score range of 0 to 6. Synovitis was assessed in the affected joint using a 4-point scale where 0=normal (best) to 3=severe (worst). Higher scores indicated more joint damage. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Score of the Single Affected JointBaseline and Month 24
The single affected joint was defined as the joint with the history of the first acute gout flare. Radiographs (X-rays) of the single affected joint in the hands or feet were evaluated using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde method. Each erosion was assessed using a 4-point scale where 0=no erosions (best) to 3=large erosion passing the mid-line (worst) and Joint space narrowing (JSN) was assessed using a 5-point scale where 0=normal (best) to 4=absence of joint space, presumptive evidence of ankyloses, or complete luxation (worst). The Erosion Score and the JSN Score were summed for the Total Score. Higher scores indicated more joint damage. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Score of the Single Affected JointBaseline and Month 24
Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they actually received. Participants with data available for analysis and missing values at Month 24 imputed using linear extrapolation are included in the analysis.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsBaseline and Month 24
Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they actually received. Participants with data available at Baseline and Month 24 are included in the analysis.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsBaseline and Month 24
Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they actually received. Participants with data available at Baseline and Month 24 are included in the analysis.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score of the Single Affected JointBaseline and Month 24
Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they actually received. Participants with data available at Baseline and Month 24 are included in the analysis.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Score of the Single Affected JointBaseline and Month 24
Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they actually received. Participants with data available at Baseline and Month 24 are included in the analysis.
score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group28

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Score of the Single Affected JointFebuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgBaseline0.16Standard Deviation 0.444score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Score of the Single Affected JointPlaceboBaseline0.11Standard Deviation 0.438score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Score of the Single Affected JointFebuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgChange from Baseline at Month 240.01Standard Deviation 0.330score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Score of the Single Affected JointPlaceboChange from Baseline at Month 240.01Standard Deviation 0.248score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsFebuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgBaseline4.98Standard Deviation 9.707score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsPlaceboBaseline4.56Standard Deviation 8.631score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsFebuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgChange from Baseline at Month 24 (n=78,74)0.31Standard Deviation 2.447score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Total Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsPlaceboChange from Baseline at Month 24 (n=78,74)0.29Standard Deviation 1.746score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsFebuxostat 40 mg or 80 mgBaseline0.36Standard Deviation 1.160score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 24 in the Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Erosion Scores From Full Hands and Feet RadiographsPlaceboBaseline0.17Standard Deviation 0.473score on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDFebuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg157
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo157
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFebuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg93
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo90
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDFebuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg64
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo67

Adverse events108

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersFebuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg9157
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo6157
otherOedema peripheralGeneral disordersFebuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg8157
otherOedema peripheralGeneral disordersPlacebo5157
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsFebuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg15157
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo16157
otherAspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsFebuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg11157
otherAspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsPlacebo6157
otherBlood creatine phosphokinase increasedInvestigationsFebuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg9157
otherBlood creatine phosphokinase increasedInvestigationsPlacebo11157

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityFebuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsFebuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg73157
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo67157
Total, serious adverse eventsFebuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg13157
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo11157

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
28975718DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Febuxostat 40 mg or 80 mg vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01078389

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01078389/results?page=2