ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01080391

Study Comparing Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd) vs Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) in Subjects With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

NCT01080391, Phase 3, Completed, Amgen; results first posted 2015-07-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study Comparing Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd) vs Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) in Subjects With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma. Trials, record NCT01080391. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01080391

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study Comparing Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd) vs Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) in Subjects With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
NCT number
NCT01080391
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
792 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Conditions
Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
Interventions
Dexamethasone, Lenalidomide, Carfilzomib
First posted
2010-03-04
Last updated
2022-09-21
Results first posted
2015-07-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)From randomization through the data cutoff date of 16 June 2014. Median follow-up time was approximately 31 months.
Kaplan-Meier estimate of median time from randomization to progressive disease (PD) or all-cause death. PD was assessed using International Myeloma Working Group-Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG-URC). One or more conditions were required to meet PD: 2 consecutive rising serum or urine M-protein from central lab; documented new bone lesion(s) or soft tissue plasmacytoma(s) or increased size of existing bone lesion(s) or plasmacytoma(s); or confirmed hypercalcemia due solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder (local lab greater than 11.5 mg/dL on 2 separate occasions). Censoring conditions (censoring dates) were: no post-baseline disease assessment (DA) (randomization date); started non-protocol systemic anticancer treatment before PD or death (last DA date before such treatment); died or had PD after more than 1 missed DA (last DA date without PD before the first missed visit); or were alive and without documentation of PD, including lost to follow-up without PD (last DA date).
SecondaryOverall SurvivalFrom randomization through the data cutoff date of 28 April 2017 for the final analysis of overall survival; median follow up time was 67.1 months in each treatment group.
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the duration from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants who were still alive were censored at the date when the participant was last known to be alive or the data cutoff date, whichever occurred earlier.
SecondaryOverall Response RateFrom randomization through the data cutoff date of 16 June 2014. Median follow-up time was approximately 31 months.
Overall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved either a confirmed stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR) as their best response based on the Independent Review Committee (IRC) assessed response outcome. Response was determined using the International Myeloma Working Group - Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG-URC).
SecondaryDisease Control RateFrom randomization through the data cutoff date of 16 June 2014. Median follow-up time was approximately 31 months.
Disease control rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best response of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), minimal response (MR), or stable disease (SD) lasting ≥ 8 weeks according to International Myeloma Working Group - Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG-URC) (MR was determined using European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria).
SecondaryDuration of ResponseFrom randomization through the data cutoff date of 16 June 2014. Longest follow-up time was approximately 42 months.
Duration of response (DOR) was calculated for participants who achieved a best response of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR). Duration of response was defined as the time in months from the initial start of response (PR or better) to the earlier of documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause. Participants who had not progressed or died were censored according to the censoring rules defined previously for PFS.
SecondaryDuration of Disease ControlFrom randomization through the data cutoff date of 16 June 2014. Longest follow-up time was approximately 46 months.
Duration of disease control (DDC) was calculated for participants who achieved disease control. DDC was defined as the time in months from randomization to the earlier of documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause. Participants who had not progressed or died were censored according to the censoring rules defined previously for PFS.
SecondaryQuality of Life Core Module (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life ScoresCycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), Day 1 of Cycles 3, 6, 12, 18
Health-related quality of life was assessed with the use of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (QLQ-C30) questionnaire, a validated instrument in multiple myeloma patients. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health related quality of life.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-free Survival (PFS)From randomization through the data cutoff date of 16 June 2014. Median follow-up time was approximately 31 months.ITT analysis set comprised of all randomized participantsmonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall SurvivalFrom randomization through the data cutoff date of 28 April 2017 for the final analysis of overall survival; median follow up time was 67.1 months in each treatment group.ITT analysis set comprised of all randomized participantsmonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Response RateFrom randomization through the data cutoff date of 16 June 2014. Median follow-up time was approximately 31 months.ITT analysis set comprised of all randomized participantspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDisease Control RateFrom randomization through the data cutoff date of 16 June 2014. Median follow-up time was approximately 31 months.ITT analysis set comprised of all randomized participantspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of ResponseFrom randomization through the data cutoff date of 16 June 2014. Longest follow-up time was approximately 42 months.The Intent to treat (ITT) population with participantant who achieved a best overall response of PR or better.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYDuration of Disease ControlFrom randomization through the data cutoff date of 16 June 2014. Longest follow-up time was approximately 46 months.The Intent to treat (ITT) population with participantants who achieved disease control.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYQuality of Life Core Module (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life ScoresCycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline), Day 1 of Cycles 3, 6, 12, 18ITT analysis set participants with a baseline value.scores on a scaleMEAN

Results by group22

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd)17.695% Confidence Interval 15.0 to 20.6months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd)26.395% Confidence Interval 23.3 to 30.5months
Overall SurvivalLenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd)40.495% Confidence Interval 33.6 to 44.4months
Overall SurvivalCarfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd)48.395% Confidence Interval 42.4 to 52.8months
Overall Response RateLenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd)66.795% Confidence Interval 61.8 to 71.3percentage of participants
Overall Response RateCarfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd)87.195% Confidence Interval 83.4 to 90.3percentage of participants
Disease Control RateLenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd)87.195% Confidence Interval 83.4 to 90.3percentage of participants
Disease Control RateCarfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd)92.795% Confidence Interval 89.7 to 95.0percentage of participants
Duration of ResponseLenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd)21.295% Confidence Interval 16.7 to 25.8months
Duration of ResponseCarfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd)28.695% Confidence Interval 24.9 to 31.3months

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd)396
Overall StudySTARTEDCarfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd)396
Overall StudyTreatedLenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd)389
Overall StudyTreatedCarfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd)392
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd)389
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCarfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd)392
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd)7
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCarfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd)4

Adverse events904

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd)154389
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCarfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd)166392
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd)22389
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCarfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd)33392
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd)133389
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCarfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd)157392
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd)94389
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCarfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd)115392
otherCataractEye disordersLenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd)36389
otherCataractEye disordersCarfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd)39392

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd)
Total, all-cause mortalityCarfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd)
Total, other adverse eventsLenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd)358389
Total, other adverse eventsCarfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd)370392
Total, serious adverse eventsLenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd)221389
Total, serious adverse eventsCarfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd)256392

Papers14

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
25482145DERIVEDPubMed
27224006BACKGROUNDPubMed
27439911BACKGROUNDPubMed
27601539BACKGROUNDPubMed
28211560BACKGROUNDPubMed
28430175BACKGROUNDPubMed
28439109BACKGROUNDPubMed
29341834BACKGROUNDPubMed
29446103BACKGROUNDPubMed
29615082BACKGROUNDPubMed

1 to 10 of 14

See all 14 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) vs Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd): serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01080391

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01080391/results?page=2