ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01096849

A Study of Plazomicin Compared With Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) and Acute Pyelonephritis (AP)

NCT01096849, Phase 2, Completed, Achaogen, Inc.; results first posted 2018-08-22

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Plazomicin Compared With Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) and Acute Pyelonephritis (AP). Trials, record NCT01096849. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01096849

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Plazomicin Compared With Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) and Acute Pyelonephritis (AP)
NCT number
NCT01096849
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
145 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Achaogen, Inc.
Conditions
Complicated Urinary Tract Infection, Acute Pyelonephritis
Interventions
levofloxacin, plazomicin, placebo
First posted
2010-03-31
Last updated
2018-08-22
Results first posted
2018-08-22

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Patients Who Attained Microbiological Eradication (MBE) at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent to Treat (MITT) PopulationDay 1 to TOC (Day 12)
MBE was defined as documented eradication of all isolated pathogens. This was based on a urine culture, taken at the TOC visit that showed that all pathogens isolated at baseline at ≥10\^5 colony forming unit(s) per milliliter (CFU/mL) were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL.
PrimaryPercentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationDay 1 to TOC (Day 12)
MBE was defined as documented eradication of all isolated pathogens. This was based on a urine culture, taken at the TOC visit that showed that all pathogens isolated at baseline at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL.
PrimaryPercentage of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Day 1 to the end of study (Day 40)
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered to be drug related. An AE (also referred to as an adverse experience) can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, and it does not imply any judgment about causality. Adverse events also include the exacerbation or worsening of a condition present at screening other than the index infection for which the patient was enrolled in the study. A TEAE is any AE that newly appeared, increased in frequency, or worsened in severity following initiation of study drug.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Attained Clinical Cure Based on Investigator and Sponsor Assessments at TOC Visit in the Intent-to-treat (ITT) PopulationDay 1 to TOC (Day 12)
Investigator's assessment criteria defined Clinical Cure as resolution of baseline clinical signs and symptoms of infection through the TOC visit. The sponsor's assessment criteria was programmatically based on the investigator's assessment of participant clinical outcome, the number of days and doses of drug received and whether an antibiotic was administered.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Attained Clinical Cure Based on Investigator and Sponsor Assessments at the TOC Visit in the CE PopulationDay 1 to TOC (Day 12)
Investigator's assessment criteria defined Clinical Cure as a resolution of baseline clinical signs and symptoms of infection through the TOC visit. The sponsor's assessment criteria was programmatically based on the investigator's assessment of participant clinical outcome, the number of days and doses of drug received and whether an antibiotic was administered.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Attained Clinical Cure Based on Investigator and Sponsor Assessments at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the CE PopulationDay 1 to EOT (Day 5)
Investigator's assessment criteria defined Clinical Cure as a resolution of baseline clinical signs and symptoms of infection through the EOT visit. The Sponsor's assessment criteria was programmatically based on the investigator's assessment of participant clinical outcome, the number of days and doses of drug received and whether an antibiotic was administered.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the EOT Visit in the ME PopulationDay 1 to EOT (Day 5)
MBE was defined as documented eradication of all isolated pathogens. This was based on a urine culture, taken at the EOT visit that showed that all pathogens isolated at baseline at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the EOT Visit in the MITT PopulationDay 1 to EOT (Day 5)
MBE was defined as documented eradication of all isolated pathogens. This was based on a urine culture, taken at the EOT visit that showed that all pathogens isolated at baseline at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the TOC Visit in the ME Population by Baseline PathogenDay 1 to TOC (Day 12)
MBE was defined as documented eradication of all isolated pathogens. This was based on a urine culture, taken at the TOC visit that showed that all pathogens isolated at baseline at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the TOC Visit in the ME Population Stratified by Infection CategoryDay 1 to TOC (Day 12)
MBE was defined as documented eradication of all isolated pathogens. This was based on a urine culture, taken at the TOC visit that showed that all pathogens isolated at baseline at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL.

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Patients Who Attained Microbiological Eradication (MBE) at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent to Treat (MITT) PopulationDay 1 to TOC (Day 12)The MITT population was defined as a subset patients from the ITT population with at least one isolated causative pathogen from an acceptable pretreatment urine specimen.percentage of patientsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationDay 1 to TOC (Day 12)
The ME population was defined as clinically evaluable (CE) patients who had a causative pathogen isolated at baseline (ie, patients in both the MITT and CE populations). To be included in the ME population, a patient must also have had results obtained from non-contaminated urine culture at TOC.
percentage of patientsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Day 1 to the end of study (Day 40)The Safety population was defined as all randomized patients who received any amount of study drug.percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Who Attained Clinical Cure Based on Investigator and Sponsor Assessments at TOC Visit in the Intent-to-treat (ITT) PopulationDay 1 to TOC (Day 12)The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized patients.percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Who Attained Clinical Cure Based on Investigator and Sponsor Assessments at the TOC Visit in the CE PopulationDay 1 to TOC (Day 12)The CE population was defined as patients who received at least 80% of study drug for clinical successes or 40% for clinical failures and must not have had indeterminate clinical response at TOC.percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Who Attained Clinical Cure Based on Investigator and Sponsor Assessments at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in the CE PopulationDay 1 to EOT (Day 5)The CE population was defined as patients who received at least 80% of study drug for clinical successes or 40% for clinical failures and must not have had indeterminate clinical response at TOC.percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the EOT Visit in the ME PopulationDay 1 to EOT (Day 5)
The ME population was defined as CE patients who had a causative pathogen isolated at baseline (ie, patients in both the MITT and CE populations). To be included in the ME population, a patient must also have had results obtained from non-contaminated urine culture at TOC.
percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the EOT Visit in the MITT PopulationDay 1 to EOT (Day 5)The MITT population was defined as a subset patients from the ITT population with at least one isolated causative pathogen from an acceptable pretreatment urine specimen.percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the TOC Visit in the ME Population by Baseline PathogenDay 1 to TOC (Day 12)
The ME population was defined as CE patients who had a causative pathogen isolated at baseline (ie, patients in both the MITT and CE populations). To be included in the ME population, a patient must also have had results obtained from non-contaminated urine culture at TOC.
percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the TOC Visit in the ME Population Stratified by Infection CategoryDay 1 to TOC (Day 12)
The ME population was defined as CE patients who had a causative pathogen isolated at baseline (ie, patients in both the MITT and CE populations). To be included in the ME population, a patient must also have had results obtained from non-contaminated urine culture at TOC.
percentage of patientsNUMBER

Results by group83

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Patients Who Attained Microbiological Eradication (MBE) at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent to Treat (MITT) PopulationPlazomicin (10 mg/kg)5095% Confidence Interval 21.1 to 78.9percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Who Attained Microbiological Eradication (MBE) at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent to Treat (MITT) PopulationPlazomicin (15 mg/kg)60.895% Confidence Interval 46.1 to 74.2percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Who Attained Microbiological Eradication (MBE) at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent to Treat (MITT) PopulationLevofloxacin58.695% Confidence Interval 38.9 to 76.5percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationPlazomicin (10 mg/kg)85.795% Confidence Interval 42.1 to 99.6percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationPlazomicin (15 mg/kg)88.695% Confidence Interval 73.3 to 96.8percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Who Attained MBE at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationLevofloxacin81.095% Confidence Interval 58.1 to 94.6percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Plazomicin (10 mg/kg)31.8percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Plazomicin (15 mg/kg)35.1percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Levofloxacin47.7percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Who Attained Clinical Cure Based on Investigator and Sponsor Assessments at TOC Visit in the Intent-to-treat (ITT) PopulationPlazomicin (10 mg/kg)Investigator's Assessment: Cured63.695% Confidence Interval 40.7 to 82.8percentage of patients

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlazomicin (10 mg/kg)22
Overall StudySTARTEDPlazomicin (15 mg/kg)76
Overall StudySTARTEDLevofloxacin47
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlazomicin (10 mg/kg)20
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlazomicin (15 mg/kg)64
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLevofloxacin41
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlazomicin (10 mg/kg)2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlazomicin (15 mg/kg)12
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLevofloxacin6

Adverse events24

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlazomicin (10 mg/kg)022
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlazomicin (15 mg/kg)474
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersLevofloxacin244
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlazomicin (10 mg/kg)022
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlazomicin (15 mg/kg)474
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersLevofloxacin044
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersPlazomicin (10 mg/kg)022
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersPlazomicin (15 mg/kg)474
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersLevofloxacin144
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlazomicin (10 mg/kg)222

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlazomicin (10 mg/kg)022
Total, all-cause mortalityPlazomicin (15 mg/kg)074
Total, all-cause mortalityLevofloxacin044
Total, other adverse eventsPlazomicin (10 mg/kg)222
Total, other adverse eventsPlazomicin (15 mg/kg)2274
Total, other adverse eventsLevofloxacin344
Total, serious adverse eventsPlazomicin (10 mg/kg)022
Total, serious adverse eventsPlazomicin (15 mg/kg)174
Total, serious adverse eventsLevofloxacin244

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
29378708BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01096849

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01096849/results?page=2