ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01104415

Study of Telotristat Etiprate (LX1606) in Participants With Symptomatic Carcinoid Syndrome

NCT01104415, Phase 2, Completed, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2018-04-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Telotristat Etiprate (LX1606) in Participants With Symptomatic Carcinoid Syndrome. Trials, record NCT01104415. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01104415

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Telotristat Etiprate (LX1606) in Participants With Symptomatic Carcinoid Syndrome
NCT number
NCT01104415
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
15 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Carcinoid Syndrome
Interventions
Telotristat etiprate
First posted
2010-04-15
Last updated
2019-03-15
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2009-016973-13
Results first posted
2018-04-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Drug-Related TEAEs in the Core PhaseBaseline up to Week 12 in the Core Phase
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as any AEs reported after the first dose of treatment on Day 1.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Drug-Related TEAEs in the Extension PeriodUp to 124 Weeks in the Extension Period
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as any AEs reported after the first dose of treatment on Day 1.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Number of Bowel Movements (BMs)Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Participants recorded the number of bowel movements in a daily diary. The change from baseline value was calculated as the difference between mean numbers of BMs of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Stool Form/ConsistencyCore Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Participants assessed stool form/consistency in a daily diary using a 6-point scale (0-none, 1-hard, 2-firm, 3-soft, 4-loose, 5-watery). The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between a mean score of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. 0 indicates the best score and 5 indicates the worst score. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Percentage of Days With Sensation of Urgency to DefecateCore Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Participants assessed the urgency to defecate using a daily diary response to the following question, "Have you felt or experienced a sense of urgency to pass stool today?". The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean score (percentage of days) of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Sensation/Severity of Nausea Using 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Sensation/severity of nausea was measured using a 100 mm VAS. Participants rated their perception of the sensation/severity of nausea experienced by marking a single vertical line on a VAS scale from 0 to 100 mm, where 0 = No vomiting and 100 = vomiting. The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean score of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. 0 indicates the best score, 100 indicates the worst score. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With an Improvement in Global Assessment of Symptoms Associated With Carcinoid SyndromeCore Phase: Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Week 24
Participants assessed their symptoms using a weekly subjective response to the following question, "In the past 7 days, have you had adequate relief of your carcinoid syndrome bowel complaints such as diarrhea, urgent need to have a bowel movement, abdominal pain, or discomfort?". The values for improvement in global assessment of symptoms associated with carcinoid syndrome in the Core Phase were averaged from Weeks 9 to 12.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Daily Severity of Abdominal Pain or Discomfort Using 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
The severity of abdominal pain was measured using a 100 mm VAS. Participants rated their perception of the sensation/severity of abdominal pain or experienced by marking a single vertical line on a VAS scale from 0 to 100 mm, where 0 = No vomiting and 100 = vomiting. The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean score of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. 0 indicate the best score, 100 indicates the worst score. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Daily Number of Cutaneous Flushing EpisodesCore Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Participants recorded the number of daily cutaneous flushing episodes experienced in the daily diary. The change from baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean numbers of cutaneous flushing episodes of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Achieving Clinically Meaningful Symptom Reduction in the Core PhaseBaseline to Week 12
Clinically meaningful symptom reduction was defined as either: a) an average of \< 4 bowel movements per day over 15 consecutive days, b) a 50% reduction from baseline in the number of bowel movements, c) a positive response to the question regarding adequate relief, or d) a 50% reduction from baseline in the number of daily flushing episodes.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Drug-Related TEAEs in the Core PhaseBaseline up to Week 12 in the Core PhaseThe safety set (SS) included all the enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Drug-Related TEAEs in the Extension PeriodUp to 124 Weeks in the Extension PeriodSS included all enrolled participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug in the 124-week Extension Period.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Number of Bowel Movements (BMs)Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Efficacy full analysis set (EFAS) in Core Phase included all participants with at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment and full analysis set (FAS) in Extension Period(EP) included all participants in SS with at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment in 124-week EP. Number analyzed is the participants with evaluable data at given time point.
number of bowel movements/dayMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Stool Form/ConsistencyCore Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
EFAS in the Core Phase included all participants who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment and FAS in the Extension period included all participants in the safety set who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment in 124-week Extension Period. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at given time-point.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Percentage of Days With Sensation of Urgency to DefecateCore Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
EFAS in Core Phase included all participants who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment and FAS in Extension Period included all participants in the safety set who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment in the 124-week Extension Period. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given time-point.
percentage of daysMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Sensation/Severity of Nausea Using 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
EFAS in Core Phase included all participants who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment and FAS in Extension Period included all participants in the safety set who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment in the 124-week Extension Period. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given time-point.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With an Improvement in Global Assessment of Symptoms Associated With Carcinoid SyndromeCore Phase: Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Week 24
EFAS in Core Phase included all participants who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment and FAS in Extension Period included all participants in the safety set who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment in the 124-week Extension Period. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given time-point.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Daily Severity of Abdominal Pain or Discomfort Using 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
EFAS in Core Phase included all participants who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment and FAS in Extension Period included all participants in the safety set who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment in the 124-week Extension Period. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given time-point.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Daily Number of Cutaneous Flushing EpisodesCore Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
EFAS in Core Phase included all participants who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment and FAS in Extension Period included all participants in the safety set who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment in the 124-week Extension Period. Number analyzed is the number of participants with evaluable data at the given time-point.
Daily number of flushing episodesMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Achieving Clinically Meaningful Symptom Reduction in the Core PhaseBaseline to Week 12EFAS included all participants who had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group21

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Drug-Related TEAEs in the Core PhaseTelotristat Etiprate- Core PhaseAny TEAE15Participants
Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Drug-Related TEAEs in the Core PhaseTelotristat Etiprate- Core PhaseDrug-Related TEAE5Participants
Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Drug-Related TEAEs in the Extension PeriodTelotristat Etiprate- Extension PeriodAny TEAE11Participants
Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Drug-Related TEAEs in the Extension PeriodTelotristat Etiprate- Extension PeriodDrug-Related TEAE4Participants
Change From Baseline in Number of Bowel Movements (BMs)Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase-2.60Standard Deviation 1.381number of bowel movements/day
Change From Baseline in Number of Bowel Movements (BMs)Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period-2.85Standard Deviation 1.64number of bowel movements/day
Change From Baseline in Stool Form/ConsistencyTelotristat Etiprate- Core Phase-0.79Standard Deviation 0.707score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Stool Form/ConsistencyTelotristat Etiprate- Extension Period-1.31Standard Deviation 0.666score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Days With Sensation of Urgency to DefecateTelotristat Etiprate- Core Phase-11.32Standard Deviation 36.660percentage of days
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Days With Sensation of Urgency to DefecateTelotristat Etiprate- Extension Period-22.79Standard Deviation 49.546percentage of days

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Core PhaseSTARTEDTelotristat Etiprate- Core Phase15
Core PhaseSTARTEDTelotristat Etiprate -Extension Period0
Core PhaseCOMPLETEDTelotristat Etiprate- Core Phase14
Core PhaseCOMPLETEDTelotristat Etiprate -Extension Period0
Core PhaseNOT COMPLETEDTelotristat Etiprate- Core Phase1
Core PhaseNOT COMPLETEDTelotristat Etiprate -Extension Period0
Extension PeriodSTARTEDTelotristat Etiprate- Core Phase0
Extension PeriodSTARTEDTelotristat Etiprate -Extension Period11
Extension PeriodCOMPLETEDTelotristat Etiprate- Core Phase0
Extension PeriodCOMPLETEDTelotristat Etiprate -Extension Period0

Adverse events220

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersTelotristat Etiprate- Core Phase615
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersTelotristat Etiprate- Extension Period211
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersTelotristat Etiprate- Core Phase315
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersTelotristat Etiprate- Extension Period411
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersTelotristat Etiprate- Core Phase215
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersTelotristat Etiprate- Extension Period211
otherFlatulenceGastrointestinal disordersTelotristat Etiprate- Core Phase215
otherFlatulenceGastrointestinal disordersTelotristat Etiprate- Extension Period011
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersTelotristat Etiprate- Core Phase215
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersTelotristat Etiprate- Extension Period211

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTelotristat Etiprate- Core Phase015
Total, all-cause mortalityTelotristat Etiprate- Extension Period111
Total, other adverse eventsTelotristat Etiprate- Core Phase1515
Total, other adverse eventsTelotristat Etiprate- Extension Period1111
Total, serious adverse eventsTelotristat Etiprate- Core Phase315
Total, serious adverse eventsTelotristat Etiprate- Extension Period711

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
25636046DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase vs Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period: Number of Participants With an Improvement in Global Assessment of Symptoms Associated With Carcinoid SyndromeTrial comparisons
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase vs Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase vs Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01104415

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01104415/results?page=2