ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01108445

Phase II Study of Afinitor vs. Sutent in Patients With Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

NCT01108445, Phase 2, Completed, Duke University; results first posted 2016-06-20

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Phase II Study of Afinitor vs. Sutent in Patients With Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Trials, record NCT01108445. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01108445

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Phase II Study of Afinitor vs. Sutent in Patients With Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
NCT number
NCT01108445
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
131 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Conditions
Advanced Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Interventions
Everolimus, Sunitinib
First posted
2010-04-22
Last updated
2018-01-16
Results first posted
2016-06-20

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes17

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAnti-tumor Activity as Measured by Median Progression Free Survival Time24 Months
The primary objective will be to compare the anti-tumor activity of everolimus and sunitinib in subjects with mRCC with non-clear cell pathology, as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) following treatment initiation according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Progressive disease is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
SecondaryProgression Free Survival Rates6, 12 and 24 months
6-, 12-, and 24-month rates of PFS in each arm will be compared for each treatment arm. Progressive disease is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
SecondaryPFS Expressed in Months24 months
Progression-free survival (PFS) expressed in months as compared to an historic control (interferon-treated clear cell RCC control arm from the sunitinib phase III study). Progressive disease is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
SecondaryOverall Response Rate24 months
Defined as complete response \[CR\] and partial response \[PR\] by RECIST 1.1 criteria in each treatment arm.Overall Response Rate (ORR) = CR + PR. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Stable Disease (SD)Baseline to 36 months
Percentage of participants with stable disease during treatment is defined as stable disease \[SD\] by RECIST 1.1 criteria as calculated in each treatment arm. Stable Disease (SD) is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Secondary12 Week Clinical Benefit Rate as PercentageBaseline to 36 months
Rate of complete or partial response or stable disease by the RECIST 1.1 criteria lasting ≥ 12 weeks prior to progression. Benefit rate is defined as complete response \[CR\] and partial response \[PR\] and stable disease \[SD\] by RECIST 1.1 criteria in each treatment arm. Benefit rate = CR + PR + SD. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
SecondaryOverall Survival Rates6, 12, 24, 36 monthsTo compare overall survival (OS) rates at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months and over time in each treatment arm.
SecondaryBest Tumor Shrinkage as a Percentile in Each Arm24 months
To compare the best tumor shrinkage as a percentile in each treatment arm. The percentile change at each follow up visit is calculated by measuring the percentage change in the Sum of lesion measurement from baseline. The best tumor shrinkage is lowest percentile change. A decrease is indicated by a negative percentage.
SecondaryMedian Duration of Response (CR, PR, and SD)24 months
To compare the median duration of response (CR, PR, and SD) in each treatment arm. According to RECIST 1.1, Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
SecondaryMedian OSUp to 40 monthsTo compare the median OS in each treatment arm.

Outcomes17

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAnti-tumor Activity as Measured by Median Progression Free Survival Time24 MonthsMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYProgression Free Survival Rates6, 12 and 24 monthspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPFS Expressed in Months24 monthsMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Response Rate24 monthspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Stable Disease (SD)Baseline to 36 monthspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARY12 Week Clinical Benefit Rate as PercentageBaseline to 36 monthspercentage of particpantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Survival Rates6, 12, 24, 36 monthspercentage probabilityNUMBER
SECONDARYBest Tumor Shrinkage as a Percentile in Each Arm24 monthspercentile decreaseMEDIAN
SECONDARYMedian Duration of Response (CR, PR, and SD)24 monthsmonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYMedian OSUp to 40 monthsmonthsMEDIAN

Results by group40

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Anti-tumor Activity as Measured by Median Progression Free Survival TimeRAD0015.680% Confidence Interval 5.5 to 6.0Months
Anti-tumor Activity as Measured by Median Progression Free Survival TimeSunitinib8.380% Confidence Interval 5.8 to 11.4Months
Progression Free Survival RatesRAD0016 Months40.395% Confidence Interval 27.3 to 52.8percentage of participants
Progression Free Survival RatesSunitinib6 Months55.095% Confidence Interval 40.1 to 67.7percentage of participants
Progression Free Survival RatesRAD00112 Months17.095% Confidence Interval 8.4 to 28.3percentage of participants
Progression Free Survival RatesSunitinib12 Months37.795% Confidence Interval 24.1 to 51.2percentage of participants
Progression Free Survival RatesRAD00124 Months9.395% Confidence Interval 3.0 to 20.2percentage of participants
Progression Free Survival RatesSunitinib24 Months22.895% Confidence Interval 11.7 to 36.1percentage of participants
PFS Expressed in MonthsRAD0015.695% Confidence Interval 4.4 to 6.1Months
PFS Expressed in MonthsSunitinib8.395% Confidence Interval 5.6 to 13.0Months

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRAD00157
Overall StudySTARTEDSunitinib51
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRAD0011
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSunitinib2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRAD00156
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSunitinib49

Adverse events826

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRAD0011657
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSunitinib1451
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRAD001257
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSunitinib451
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersRAD001157
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersSunitinib051
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRAD001157
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSunitinib051
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRAD001157
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSunitinib551

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRAD001
Total, all-cause mortalitySunitinib
Total, other adverse eventsRAD0015757
Total, other adverse eventsSunitinib5151
Total, serious adverse eventsRAD0013657
Total, serious adverse eventsSunitinib4151

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
23228299DERIVEDPubMed
26794930DERIVEDPubMed
37146227DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
RAD001 vs Sunitinib: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01108445

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01108445/results?page=2