ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01110421

A Safety and Tolerability Study of Doripenem Compared With Cefepime in Hospitalized Children With Bacterial Pneumonia

NCT01110421, Phase 3, Terminated, Janssen Research & Development, LLC; results first posted 2014-07-02

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Safety and Tolerability Study of Doripenem Compared With Cefepime in Hospitalized Children With Bacterial Pneumonia. Trials, record NCT01110421. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01110421

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Safety and Tolerability Study of Doripenem Compared With Cefepime in Hospitalized Children With Bacterial Pneumonia
NCT number
NCT01110421
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
7 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Conditions
Pneumonia, Bacterial, Community-Acquired Infections, Nosocomial Infection, Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated
Interventions
Cefepime placebo, Cefepime, Doripenem, Doripenem placebo, Amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium
First posted
2010-04-26
Last updated
2014-07-15
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2009-016069-27
Results first posted
2014-07-02
Limitations and caveats
This study was terminated early due to business reasons and not related to safety concerns or issues. As such, the limited enrollment precludes a meaningful conclusion about the efficacy and safety of doripenem compared with cefepime.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryThe Number of Participants With Clinical Cure Rate at Test Of Cure (TOC) VisitTOC (7 to 14 days after the last dose of study medication therapy)
The participants were classified as cure if they had resolution or clinical improvement of signs and symptoms of pneumonia, favorable response at End of treatment for IV study (EIV) visit; had no fever; improvement or no progression of radiographic findings of pneumonia on chest X ray; improvement in oxygenation or discontinued mechanical ventilation in intubated participants; and not received nonstudy systemic antibacterial therapy for pneumonia.
SecondaryThe Number of Participants With Clinical Improvement Rate at End of IV (EIV) VisitEIV (within 24 hours after completion of the last dose of IV study medication therapy)
Participants were considered as clinical improved if they had no fever, clinical improvement in signs and symptoms of pneumonia from baseline, decrease in WBC, improvement or lack of progression of radiographic findings in comparison with the screening chest X-ray, and not received any nonstudy systemic antibacterial therapy for the treatment of pneumonia after IV study drug therapy had begun.
SecondaryThe Number of Participants With Clinical Cure Rate at Late Follow-Up (LFU) VisitLFU (28 to 42 days after the last dose of study medication therapy)
The participants were classified as clinical cure if all pretreatment signs and symptoms showed no evidence of resurgence after administration of the last dose of study medication and no nonstudy systemic antibacterial therapy was given for the treatment of pneumonia.
SecondaryThe Number of Participants With Favorable Per-participant Microbiological Response Rate
EIV (within 24 hours after completion of the last dose of IV study medication therapy), TOC (7 to 14 days after the last dose of study medication therapy), and LFU (28 to 42 days after the last dose of study medication therapy)
Favorable per-participant microbiological response rate was evaluated at the at End of IV (EIV) visit, Test Of Cure (TOC) visit, and Late Follow-Up (LFU) visit. The favorable per-participant microbiological response was considered when all baseline pathogens were eradicated (absence) or presumed eradicated (absence of material to culture in a participant who has a positive clinical response to treatment).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Outcome Rate at End of IV (EIV) VisitEIV (within 24 hours after completion of the last dose of IV study medication therapy)
A total of 3 pathogens were isolated at baseline from lower respiratory tract (LRT) culture in 2 participants in the doripenem treatment group and were susceptible to the study drug received: 2 pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus Klebsiella pneumoniae) were isolated at baseline from 1 participant and a 3rd pathogen (Streptococcus pneumoniae) was isolated at baseline from the other participant (see listed in the table below; the number in parenthesis next to each pathogen represent the number of participants with the pathogen isolated at baseline in the doripenem treatment group). The favorable per-participant microbiological response was considered when all baseline pathogens were eradicated (absence) or presumed eradicated (absence of material to culture in a participant who has a positive clinical response to treatment). NOTE: No participants in the cefepime treatment group met criteria for inclusion in the Microbiological intent-to-treat analysis.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Outcome Rate at Test Of Cure (TOC) VisitTOC (7 to 14 days after the last dose of study medication therapy)
A total of 3 pathogens were isolated at baseline from lower respiratory tract (LRT) culture in 2 participants in the doripenem treatment group and were susceptible to the study drug received: 2 pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus Klebsiella pneumoniae) were isolated at baseline from 1 participant and a 3rd pathogen (Streptococcus pneumoniae) was isolated at baseline from the other participant (see listed in the table below; the number in parenthesis next to each pathogen represent the number of participants with the pathogen isolated at baseline in the doripenem treatment group). The favorable per-participant microbiological response was considered when all baseline pathogens were eradicated (absence) or presumed eradicated (absence of material to culture in a participant who has a positive clinical response to treatment). NOTE: No participants in the cefepime treatment group met criteria for inclusion in the Microbiological intent-to-treat analysis.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Sustained Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Outcome Rate at Late Follow-Up (LFU) VisitLFU (28 to 42 days after the last dose of study medication therapy)
A total of 3 pathogens were isolated at baseline from lower respiratory tract (LRT) culture in 2 participants in the doripenem treatment group and were susceptible to the study drug received: 2 pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus Klebsiella pneumoniae) were isolated at baseline from 1 participant and a 3rd pathogen (Streptococcus pneumoniae) was isolated at baseline from the other participant (see listed in the table below; the number in parenthesis next to each pathogen represent the number of participants with the pathogen isolated at baseline in the doripenem treatment group). The favorable per-participant microbiological response was considered when all baseline pathogens were eradicated (absence) or presumed eradicated (absence of material to culture in a participant who has a positive clinical response to treatment). NOTE: No participants in the cefepime treatment group met criteria for inclusion in the Microbiological intent-to-treat analysis.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYThe Number of Participants With Clinical Cure Rate at Test Of Cure (TOC) VisitTOC (7 to 14 days after the last dose of study medication therapy)
Clinical Intent-To-Treat (CITT): All randomized participants who met the minimal disease definition of pneumonia regardless if a baseline pathogen was isolated from the baseline lower respiratory tract culture, pleural fluid or blood culture.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Number of Participants With Clinical Improvement Rate at End of IV (EIV) VisitEIV (within 24 hours after completion of the last dose of IV study medication therapy)
Clinical intent-to-treat: All randomized participants who met the minimal disease definition of pneumonia regardless if a baseline pathogen was isolated from the baseline lower respiratory tract culture, pleural fluid or blood culture.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Number of Participants With Clinical Cure Rate at Late Follow-Up (LFU) VisitLFU (28 to 42 days after the last dose of study medication therapy)
Clinical Intent-to-Treat (CITT): All randomized participants who met the minimal disease definition of pneumonia regardless if a baseline pathogen was isolated from the baseline lower respiratory tract (LRT) culture, pleural fluid or blood culture.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Number of Participants With Favorable Per-participant Microbiological Response Rate
EIV (within 24 hours after completion of the last dose of IV study medication therapy), TOC (7 to 14 days after the last dose of study medication therapy), and LFU (28 to 42 days after the last dose of study medication therapy)
Microbiological intent-to-treat - Participants of CITT with at least one baseline pneumonia pathogen from pleural fluid, LRT, or blood culture susceptible to doripenem and cefepime. 3 and 2 participants from doripenem and cefepime, respectively had no susceptible pneumonia pathogens at baseline and were excluded from this set.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Outcome Rate at End of IV (EIV) VisitEIV (within 24 hours after completion of the last dose of IV study medication therapy)
Microbiological intent-to-treat - Participants of CITT with at least one baseline pneumonia pathogen from pleural fluid, LRT, or blood culture susceptible to doripenem and cefepime. 3 and 2 participants from doripenem and cefepime, respectively had no susceptible pneumonia pathogens at baseline and were excluded from this set.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Outcome Rate at Test Of Cure (TOC) VisitTOC (7 to 14 days after the last dose of study medication therapy)
Microbiological intent-to-treat - Participants of CITT with at least one baseline pneumonia pathogen from pleural fluid, LRT, or blood culture susceptible to doripenem and cefepime. 3 and 2 participants from doripenem and cefepime, respectively had no susceptible pneumonia pathogens at baseline and were excluded from this set.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Sustained Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Outcome Rate at Late Follow-Up (LFU) VisitLFU (28 to 42 days after the last dose of study medication therapy)
Microbiological intent-to-treat - Participants of CITT with at least one baseline pneumonia pathogen from pleural fluid, LRT, or blood culture susceptible to doripenem and cefepime. 3 and 2 participants from doripenem and cefepime, respectively had no susceptible pneumonia pathogens at baseline and were excluded from this set.
ParticipantsNUMBER

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
The Number of Participants With Clinical Cure Rate at Test Of Cure (TOC) VisitDoripenem3Participants
The Number of Participants With Clinical Cure Rate at Test Of Cure (TOC) VisitCefepime2Participants
The Number of Participants With Clinical Improvement Rate at End of IV (EIV) VisitDoripenem4Participants
The Number of Participants With Clinical Improvement Rate at End of IV (EIV) VisitCefepime2Participants
The Number of Participants With Clinical Cure Rate at Late Follow-Up (LFU) VisitDoripenem3Participants
The Number of Participants With Clinical Cure Rate at Late Follow-Up (LFU) VisitCefepime2Participants
The Number of Participants With Favorable Per-participant Microbiological Response RateDoripenemTOC visit2Participants
The Number of Participants With Favorable Per-participant Microbiological Response RateDoripenemEIV visit2Participants
The Number of Participants With Favorable Per-participant Microbiological Response RateDoripenemLFU visit2Participants
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-pathogen Microbiological Outcome Rate at End of IV (EIV) VisitDoripenemStaphylococcus aureus (1)1Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDDoripenem5
Overall StudySTARTEDCefepime2
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDoripenem5
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCefepime2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDoripenem0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCefepime0

Adverse events32

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAbdominal PainGastrointestinal disordersDoripenem15
otherAbdominal PainGastrointestinal disordersCefepime02
otherAbdominal Pain UpperGastrointestinal disordersDoripenem15
otherAbdominal Pain UpperGastrointestinal disordersCefepime02
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersDoripenem15
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersCefepime02
otherChest PainGeneral disordersDoripenem15
otherChest PainGeneral disordersCefepime02
otherHypersensitivityImmune system disordersDoripenem15
otherHypersensitivityImmune system disordersCefepime02

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDoripenem
Total, all-cause mortalityCefepime
Total, other adverse eventsDoripenem35
Total, other adverse eventsCefepime12
Total, serious adverse eventsDoripenem25
Total, serious adverse eventsCefepime02

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Doripenem vs Cefepime: The Number of Participants With Clinical Cure Rate at Test Of Cure (TOC) VisitTrial comparisons
Doripenem vs Cefepime: The Number of Participants With Clinical Cure Rate at Late Follow-Up (LFU) VisitTrial comparisons
Doripenem vs Cefepime: The Number of Participants With Clinical Improvement Rate at End of IV (EIV) VisitTrial comparisons
Doripenem vs Cefepime: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01110421

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01110421/events?page=2