ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01121575

Registered outcomes42

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverview of Treatment-emergent All Causalities Adverse Events (AEs) in Escalation PhaseUp to Maximum of treatment duration + 28 days for each participant (could be 295 days)
AE was any untoward medical occurrence with study drug/ device in a trial participant. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. AEs were reported from signing of informed consent until 28 days after the last dose of study medication. SAEs were reported after this time frame if considered to be treatment related. The severity of AEs were graded by the investigator using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v.4.02 and was assessed as Grade 0: no change from normal or reference range; Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: death related to AE. However the below table included Grade 3, 4, and 5 AEs.
PrimaryOverview of Treatment-emergent All Causalities AEs in Expansion PhaseUp to Maximum of treatment duration + 28 days for each participant (could be 295 days)
AE was any untoward medical occurrence with study drug/ device in a trial participant. SAE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. AEs were reported from signing of informed consent until 28 days after the last dose of study medication. SAEs were reported after this time frame if considered to be treatment related. The severity of AEs were graded by the investigator using NCI CTCAE v.4.02 and was assessed as Grade 0: no change from normal or reference range; Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: death related to AE. However the below table included Grade 3, 4, and 5 AEs.
PrimaryOverview of Treatment-emergent, Treatment-related AEs in Escalation PhaseUp to Maximum of treatment duration + 28 days for each participant (could be 295 days)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study treatment in a participant who received study treatment. SAE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. AEs were reported from signing of informed consent until 28 days after the last dose of study medication. SAEs were reported after this time frame if considered to be treatment related. The severity of AEs were graded by the investigator using NCI CTCAE v.4.02 and was assessed as Grade 0: no change from normal or reference range; Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: death related to AE. However the below table included Grade 3, 4, and 5 AEs.
PrimaryOverview of Treatment-emergent, Treatment-related AEs in Expansion PhaseUp to Maximum of treatment duration + 28 days for each participant (could be 295 days)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study treatment in a participant who received study treatment. SAE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. AEs were reported from signing of informed consent until 28 days after the last dose of study medication. SAEs were reported after this time frame if considered to be treatment related. The severity of AEs were graded by the investigator using NCI CTCAE v.4.02 and was assessed as Grade 0: no change from normal or reference range; Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: death related to AE. However the below table included Grade 3, 4, and 5 AEs.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in Escalation PhaseCycle 1 (4 weeks)
DLTs were those AEs which occurred in Cycle 1 of treatment in Dose Escalation Phase which may be attributed to study drug \[combined Crizotinib (PF-02341066) plus Dacomitinib (PF-00299804)\] without a clear alternative explanation and despite the use of adequate/maximal medical intervention as dictated by local institutional clinical practices or the judgment of the investigator. The following events were considered DLTs (using CTCAE version 4.02);1. Grade ≥4 hematologic events. 2. Grade ≥3 non-hematological events (except Grade 3/4 asymptomatic hypophosphatemia and Grade 3/4 hyperuricemia without signs and symptoms of gout). Nausea, vomiting or diarrhea had to have persisted at Grade 3 or 4 despite maximal medical therapy. Grade 3 hypertension will be considered a DLT only if the event is unmanageable by standard approved pharmacologic agents or if the symptomatic sequelae are identified despite appropriate medical intervention.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Stable Disease and Stable Disease Duration in Escalation PhaseFrom objective response to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to post treatment follow-up as 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment)
If a participant had not achieved an objective response with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) - 1.1 as determined by the investigators, relative to the response evaluable population, but remained stable for at least 6 weeks after first dose, then the best overall response for such a participant was considered as stable disease.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Stable Disease and Stable Disease Duration in Expansion PhaseFrom objective response to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to post treatment follow-up as 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment)
If a participant had not achieved an objective response with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST (1.1) as determined by the investigators, relative to the response evaluable population, but remained stable for at least 6 weeks after first dose, then the best overall response for such a participant was considered as stable disease.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Escalation PhaseFrom objective response to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to post treatment follow-up as 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment)
ORR was defined as the percent of participants with CR or PR according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) determined by study physicians, relative to the response evaluable population. Participants were considered non-responders until proven otherwise. Thus, participants who: 1) Did not have CR or PR while on study, or 2) Did not have a post-baseline tumor evaluation, or 3) Received anti-tumor treatment other than the study medication prior to reaching a CR or PR, or 4) Died, in progress, or drop out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR, were counted as non-responders in the assessment of ORR. To be assigned a status of PR or CR, changes in tumor measurements in participants with responding tumors were confirmed by repeated tumor assessment that were performed 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With ORR in Expansion PhaseFrom objective response to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to post treatment follow-up as 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment)
ORR was defined as the percent of participants with CR or PR according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) determined by study physicians, relative to the response evaluable population. Participants were considered non-responders until proven otherwise. Thus, participants who: 1) Did not have CR or PR while on study, or 2) Did not have a post-baseline tumor evaluation, or 3) Received anti-tumor treatment other than the study medication prior to reaching a CR or PR, or 4) Died, in progress, or drop out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR, were counted as non-responders in the assessment of ORR. To be assigned a status of PR or CR, changes in tumor measurements in participants with responding tumors were confirmed by repeated tumor assessment that were performed 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met.
SecondaryDuration of Response for the Only Participant Shown Partial Response in Expansion PhaseFrom objective response to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to post treatment follow-up as 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment)This outcome measure presented the duration of response for one participant in expansion cohort 1 who showed partial response.
SecondaryProgression Free Survival (PFS) in Escalation PhaseFrom randomization to objective tumor progression or death (up to post treatment follow-up as 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment)
PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first dose to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression according to RECIST 1.1 or death on study due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used.
SecondaryProgression Free Survival (PFS) in Expansion PhaseFrom randomization to objective tumor progression or death (up to post treatment follow-up as 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment)
PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first dose to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression according to RECIST 1.1 or death on study due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used.
SecondaryExpression Analysis of Tumor Biomarkers (HGF, EGFR, and c-Met ) at Baseline Using Immunohistochemistry (IHC) MethodBaseline
Tumor biomarkers such as HGF, EGFR, and c-Met were analyzed in tumor cells (neoplastic compartment) of tumor specimens from both expansion cohorts 1 and 2 by IHC. The H score was derived by summing the percentages of cells staining at each intensity multiplied by the weighted intensity of staining (0, 1+, 2+, 3+, where 3+ indicates the strongest staining, 2+ indicates medium staining, 1+ indicates weak staining, and 0 indicates no staining). Minimum calculated score of 0 to maximum calculated score of 300, where 0 correspond to no expression and maximum score of 300 indicates the strongest expression. However, the biomarker expression level (higher or lower) was not a predictor of outcome.
SecondaryExpression Analysis of Tumor Biomarkers (EGFR, and c-Met) at Baseline Using Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) MethodBaselineExpression of tumor biomarkers EGFR and cMet at Baseline (using FISH method) are presented in this outcome measure.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With c-Met, HER2, EGFR Amplification and ALK Rearrangement at Baseline Using FISH MethodBaselineParticipants showed amplification of c-Met, HER2, and EGFR in the tumor cells and gene rearrangement of ALK are presented in this outcome measure.
SecondaryPlasma Concentration of sMet by Study VisitsAt screening and Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1) (6 hours post dose), and C1D15, C2D1, C2D15 (all predose).This outcome measure presented the plasma concentration of sMet at different study visits. s-Met was analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With EGFR Mutation at BaselineBaselineSample analyses were performed in accordance to Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) guidance and included mutation detection for EGFR gene.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With KRAS Mutation (GLY12CYS) at BaselineBaselineSample analyses were performed in accordance to GLP guidance and included mutation detection for KRAS gene.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With PIK3CA Mutation at BaselineBaselineSample analyses were performed in accordance to GLP guidance and included mutation detection for PIK3CA gene.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With ROS1 Gene Translocation at BaselineBaselineSample analyses were performed in accordance to GLP guidance and included translocation detection (RNA based) for ROS1 gene.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01121575/registered