ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01121757

Epigenetic Modulation in Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma and Marginal Zone Lymphoma

NCT01121757, Phase 2, Terminated, Duke University; results first posted 2015-05-07

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Epigenetic Modulation in Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma and Marginal Zone Lymphoma. Trials, record NCT01121757. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01121757

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Epigenetic Modulation in Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma and Marginal Zone Lymphoma
NCT number
NCT01121757
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
11 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Conditions
Follicular Lymphoma, Marginal Zone Lymphoma
Interventions
azacitidine, lenalidomide
First posted
2010-05-12
Last updated
2016-09-12
Results first posted
2015-05-07

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryResponse Predicted by Molecular Signatures Compared to True Responseapproximately one yearThe predicted response (response to therapy vs. no response to therapy) using gene sequencing will be compared to the overall "true" response (reported in Primary Outcome 2).
PrimaryOverall ResponseResponse will be assessed after at least 4 months on first study drug.
Number of patients with a complete or partial response using Cheson criteria for lymphoma. A complete response is defined as a complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. A partial response is defined as a greater than or equal to 50% decrease in the sum of the products of the greatest diameters of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in size of nodes, liver or spleen and no new sites of disease. Patients who have been on study drug for at least 2 months will be considered evaluable for response as long as they have had repeat imaging to assess response or clear progression based on physical exam.
PrimaryOverall ResponseResponse will be assessed after at least 4 months on second drug.
Number of patients with a complete or partial response using Cheson criteria for lymphoma. A complete response is defined as a complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. A partial response is defined as a greater than or equal to 50% decrease in the sum of the products of the greatest diameters of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in size of nodes, liver or spleen and no new sites of disease. Patients who have been on study drug for at least 2 months will be considered evaluable for response as long as they have had repeat imaging to assess response or clear progression based on physical exam.
PrimaryOverall ResponseResponse will be assessed after at least 6 months on combination drug.
Number of patients with a complete or partial response using Cheson criteria for lymphoma. A complete response is defined as a complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. A partial response is defined as a greater than or equal to 50% decrease in the sum of the products of the greatest diameters of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in size of nodes, liver or spleen and no new sites of disease. Patients who have been on study drug for at least 2 months will be considered evaluable for response as long as they have had repeat imaging to assess response or clear progression based on physical exam.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 ToxicitiesWhile taking the study drug and 30 days after the last dose
Evaluate the safety of lenalidomide, azacitidine and the combination of azacitidine + lenalidomide in patients with lymphoma; grading the adverse events using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0
OtherSerum Markers Measured on the First Day of Cycle 1 and on the First Day of Cycle 3Within 4 months of taking single agent and 6 months of taking the combination

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYResponse Predicted by Molecular Signatures Compared to True Responseapproximately one yearThe number of participants who were evaluated for a response were analyzed to see if the prediction of response vs. no response through gene expression matched the true response.participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYOverall ResponseResponse will be assessed after at least 4 months on first study drug.Everyone who started the first drug regimenparticipantsNUMBER
PRIMARYOverall ResponseResponse will be assessed after at least 4 months on second drug.Everyone who started the second drug regimenparticipantsNUMBER
PRIMARYOverall ResponseResponse will be assessed after at least 6 months on combination drug.Only subjects that completed combination drug will be included in analysis.
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 ToxicitiesWhile taking the study drug and 30 days after the last doseparticipantsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDSerum Markers Measured on the First Day of Cycle 1 and on the First Day of Cycle 3Within 4 months of taking single agent and 6 months of taking the combination

Results by group14

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Response Predicted by Molecular Signatures Compared to True Response1a-Azacitidine Followed by LenalidomidePredicted: Response; Actual: Response1participants
Response Predicted by Molecular Signatures Compared to True Response1b-Lenalidomide Followed by AzacitidinePredicted: Response; Actual: Response0participants
Response Predicted by Molecular Signatures Compared to True Response1a-Azacitidine Followed by LenalidomidePredicted: No Response; Actual: No Response2participants
Response Predicted by Molecular Signatures Compared to True Response1b-Lenalidomide Followed by AzacitidinePredicted: No Response; Actual: No Response3participants
Response Predicted by Molecular Signatures Compared to True Response1a-Azacitidine Followed by LenalidomidePredicted: Response; Actual: No Response3participants
Response Predicted by Molecular Signatures Compared to True Response1b-Lenalidomide Followed by AzacitidinePredicted: Response; Actual: No Response0participants
Overall Response1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide1participants
Overall Response1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine0participants
Overall Response1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide2participants
Overall Response1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine0participants

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
First DrugSTARTED1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide6
First DrugSTARTED1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine3
First DrugCOMPLETED1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide5
First DrugCOMPLETED1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine1
First DrugNOT COMPLETED1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide1
First DrugNOT COMPLETED1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine2
Second DrugSTARTED1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide4
Second DrugSTARTED1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine1
Second DrugCOMPLETED1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide4
Second DrugCOMPLETED1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine1

Adverse events172

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide368
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine030
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disorders1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide161
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disorders1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine131
otherAtrial flutterCardiac disorders1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide161
otherAtrial flutterCardiac disorders1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine030
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disorders1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide162
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disorders1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine030
otherMiddle ear inflammationEar and labyrinth disorders1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide263
otherMiddle ear inflammationEar and labyrinth disorders1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine030

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortality1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide
Total, all-cause mortality1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine
Total, other adverse events1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide66
Total, other adverse events1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine33
Total, serious adverse events1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide26
Total, serious adverse events1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine23

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide vs 1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine: Overall ResponseTrial comparisons
1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide vs 1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine: Overall ResponseTrial comparisons
1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide vs 1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01121757

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01121757/events?page=2