ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT01133847

Interventions for Children With Attention and Reading Disorders

NCT01133847, Phase 4, Completed, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston; results first posted 2017-04-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Interventions for Children With Attention and Reading Disorders. Trials, record NCT01133847. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01133847

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Interventions for Children With Attention and Reading Disorders
NCT number
NCT01133847
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
222 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Conditions
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Reading Disabilities
Interventions
Methylphenidate, Intensive reading instruction, Parent Training, Mixed Salt Amphetamine, Atomoxetine, Guanfacine
First posted
2010-05-31
Last updated
2017-04-11
Results first posted
2017-04-11
Limitations and caveats
There was some non-adherence, particularly for the ADHD treatment. Our oversampling of low income, African American children, although valuable in an understudied population, may limit generalizability.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimarySwanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Parent Rating of Inattention16 weeks (end of Active Treatment phase), and follow-up
Rating Scale of ADHD symptomology completed by parents and teachers. Raters evaluate how well each DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) ADHD symptom describes a child on a four-point Likert scale (0=Not at all, 1=Just a little, 2=Quite a bit, 3=Very much). The measure shows adequate internal consistency (.94) and test-retest reliability (Bussing et al., 2008; Gau et al., 2008).
PrimarySwanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Parent Rating of Hyperactivity-impulsivity16 weeks (end of Active Treatment phase), and follow-up
Rating Scale of ADHD symptomology completed by parents and teachers. Raters evaluate how well each DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) ADHD symptom describes a child on a four-point Likert scale (0=Not at all, 1=Just a little, 2=Quite a bit, 3=Very much). The measure shows adequate internal consistency (.94) and test-retest reliability (Bussing et al., 2008; Gau et al., 2008).
PrimarySwanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Teacher Rating of InattentionWeek 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
Rating Scale of ADHD symptomology completed by parents and teachers. Raters evaluate how well each DSM-IV ADHD symptom describes a child on a four-point Likert scale (0=Not at all, 1=Just a little, 2=Quite a bit, 3=Very much). The measure shows adequate internal consistency (.94) and test-retest reliability (Bussing et al., 2008; Gau et al., 2008).
PrimarySwanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Teacher Rating of Hyperactivity-impulsivityWeek 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
Rating Scale of ADHD symptomology completed by parents and teachers. Raters evaluate how well each DSM-IV ADHD symptom describes a child on a four-point Likert scale (0=Not at all, 1=Just a little, 2=Quite a bit, 3=Very much). The measure shows adequate internal consistency (.94) and test-retest reliability (Bussing et al., 2008; Gau et al., 2008).
PrimaryWechsler Individual Achievement Test-III (WIAT-III) Word Reading SubtestWeek 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
The WIAT-III is an individually-administered test of academic achievement. In the Word Reading subtest students read a list of increasingly difficult words. Scores reported here are standardized scores with a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15.
PrimaryWechsler Individual Achievement Test-III (WIAT-III) Pseudoword Decoding SubtestWeek 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
The WIAT-III is an individually-administered test of academic achievement. In the Pseudoword Decoding subtest students read a list of increasingly difficult nonsense words as a test of their ability to use phonics to decode unknown words. Scores reported here are standardized scores with a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Higher scores represent a better outcome.
SecondaryWechsler Individual Achievement Test-III (WIAT-III) Reading Comprehension SubtestWeek 16, End of Active Treatment Phase
The WIAT-III is an individually-administered test of academic achievement. This subtest involves reading sentences and longer passages and then answering a set of literal and inferential comprehension questions about the text. Scores reported here are standardized scores with a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Higher scores represent a better outcome.
SecondaryDynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills Oral Reading Fluency Subtest (DIBELS ORF)Week 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
DIBELS ORF measures oral reading fluency in connected text. Students are presented with a passage on their grade level to read orally, and the score is the number of words of the passage read correctly in a one-minute period. Students in this study read two passages at each test administration, and the mean score for the two passages was the dependent variable analyzed. A research synthesis of studies reporting psychometric properties for DIBELS ORF determined that reliability coefficients in these studies exceeded .80 and that the measure demonstrated moderate to high concurrent and predictive validity across studies (Goffreda \& DiPerna, 2010).
SecondaryTest of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) - Sight Word EfficiencyWeek 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
The TOWRE Sight Word Efficiency subtest measures fluency of reading words in lists. The raw score is the number of words or nonwords identified correctly in 45 seconds. Standard scores with a mean of 100 and standard deviaion of 15 are reported here. Higher scores represent a better outcome.
SecondaryTest of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) - Phonemic Decoding EfficiencyWeek 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
The TOWRE Phonemic Decoding Efficiency measures the student's fluent decoding of nonsense words that follow the spelling rules of the English language. The raw score is the number of nonwords identified correctly in 45 seconds. Standardized scores with a mean of 100 and standard deviaion of 15 are reported here. Higher scores represent a better outcome.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYSwanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Parent Rating of Inattention16 weeks (end of Active Treatment phase), and follow-up
Six excluded from analyses (1 from ADHD Treatment , 1 from Intensive Reading Instruction , 4 from Combined ) because upon ex post-facto review of records, they did not meet inclusion criteria and had been included in error. Other reductions in numbers analyzed on this variable were due to missing data.
Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYSwanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Parent Rating of Hyperactivity-impulsivity16 weeks (end of Active Treatment phase), and follow-up
Six excluded from analyses (1 from ADHD Treatment , 1 from Intensive Reading Instruction , 4 from Combined ) because upon ex post-facto review of records, they did not meet inclusion criteria and had been included in error. Other reductions in numbers analyzed on this variable were due to missing data.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYSwanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Teacher Rating of InattentionWeek 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
Six excluded from analyses (1 from ADHD Treatment , 1 from Intensive Reading Instruction , 4 from Combined ) because upon ex post-facto review of records, they did not meet inclusion criteria and had been included in error. Other reductions in numbers analyzed on this variable were due to missing data.
Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYSwanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Teacher Rating of Hyperactivity-impulsivityWeek 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
Six excluded from analyses (1 from ADHD Treatment , 1 from Intensive Reading Instruction , 4 from Combined) because upon ex post-facto review of records, they did not meet inclusion criteria and had been included in error. Other reductions in numbers analyzed on this variable were due to missing data.
Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYWechsler Individual Achievement Test-III (WIAT-III) Word Reading SubtestWeek 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
Six excluded from analyses (1 from ADHD Treatment , 1 from Intensive Reading Instruction , 4 from Combined ) because upon ex post-facto review of records, they did not meet inclusion criteria and had been included in error. Other discrepancies in numbers are due to missing data.
standardized scores, M=100, SD = 15LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYWechsler Individual Achievement Test-III (WIAT-III) Pseudoword Decoding SubtestWeek 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
Six excluded from analyses (1 from ADHD Treatment , 1 from Intensive Reading Instruction , 4 from Combined ) because upon ex post-facto review of records, they did not meet inclusion criteria and had been included in error. Other reductions in numbers analyzed on this variable were due to missing data.
standardized scoresLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYWechsler Individual Achievement Test-III (WIAT-III) Reading Comprehension SubtestWeek 16, End of Active Treatment Phase
Six excluded from analyses (1 from ADHD Treatment , 1 from Intensive Reading Instruction , 4 from Combined ) because upon ex post-facto review of records, they did not meet inclusion criteria and had been included in error.
standardized scoresLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills Oral Reading Fluency Subtest (DIBELS ORF)Week 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
Six excluded from analyses (1 from ADHD Treatment , 1 from Intensive Reading Instruction , 4 from Combined ) because upon ex post-facto review of records, they did not meet inclusion criteria and had been included in error. Other reductions in numbers analyzed on this variable were due to missing data.
words read correctly per minuteMEAN
SECONDARYTest of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) - Sight Word EfficiencyWeek 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
Six excluded from analyses (1 from ADHD Treatment , 1 from Intensive Reading Instruction , 4 from Combined ) because upon ex post-facto review of records, they did not meet inclusion criteria and had been included in error. Other reductions in numbers analyzed on this variable were due to missing data.
standardized scoresLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYTest of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) - Phonemic Decoding EfficiencyWeek 16 (End of Active Treatment Phase) and Follow-Up
Six excluded from analyses (1 from ADHD Treatment , 1 from Intensive Reading Instruction , 4 from Combined ) because upon ex post-facto review of records, they did not meet inclusion criteria and had been included in error. Other reductions in numbers analyzed on this variable were due to missing data.
standardized scoresLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group60

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Parent Rating of InattentionADHD Treatment16-Week Outcomes1.1Standard Error 0.1Units on a scale
Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Parent Rating of InattentionIntensive Reading Instruction16-Week Outcomes1.7Standard Error 0.1Units on a scale
Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Parent Rating of InattentionCombined ADHD Treatment and Reading Instruction16-Week Outcomes1.0Standard Error 0.1Units on a scale
Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Parent Rating of InattentionADHD TreatmentFollow-up Outcomes1.3Standard Error 0.1Units on a scale
Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Parent Rating of InattentionIntensive Reading InstructionFollow-up Outcomes1.6Standard Error 0.1Units on a scale
Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Parent Rating of InattentionCombined ADHD Treatment and Reading InstructionFollow-up Outcomes1.0Standard Error 0.1Units on a scale
Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Parent Rating of Hyperactivity-impulsivityADHD Treatment16-Week Outcomes0.8Standard Error 0.1units on a scale
Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Parent Rating of Hyperactivity-impulsivityIntensive Reading Instruction16-Week Outcomes1.3Standard Error 0.1units on a scale
Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Parent Rating of Hyperactivity-impulsivityCombined ADHD Treatment and Reading Instruction16-Week Outcomes0.6Standard Error 0.1units on a scale
Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Checklist for DSM-IV (SNAP)- Parent Rating of Hyperactivity-impulsivityADHD TreatmentFollow-up Outcomes0.9Standard Error 0.1units on a scale

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Active Treatment Phase (Weeks 1-16)STARTEDADHD Treatment78
Active Treatment Phase (Weeks 1-16)STARTEDIntensive Reading Instruction74
Active Treatment Phase (Weeks 1-16)STARTEDCombined ADHD Treatment and Reading Instruction70
Active Treatment Phase (Weeks 1-16)COMPLETEDADHD Treatment73
Active Treatment Phase (Weeks 1-16)COMPLETEDIntensive Reading Instruction73
Active Treatment Phase (Weeks 1-16)COMPLETEDCombined ADHD Treatment and Reading Instruction67
Active Treatment Phase (Weeks 1-16)NOT COMPLETEDADHD Treatment5
Active Treatment Phase (Weeks 1-16)NOT COMPLETEDIntensive Reading Instruction1
Active Treatment Phase (Weeks 1-16)NOT COMPLETEDCombined ADHD Treatment and Reading Instruction3
Follow-Up PhaseSTARTEDADHD Treatment73

Adverse events3

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAggressive behaviorsSocial circumstancesADHD Treatment3713
otherAggressive behaviorsSocial circumstancesIntensive Reading Instruction1741
otherAggressive behaviorsSocial circumstancesCombined ADHD Treatment and Reading Instruction5685

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityADHD Treatment
Total, all-cause mortalityIntensive Reading Instruction
Total, all-cause mortalityCombined ADHD Treatment and Reading Instruction
Total, other adverse eventsADHD Treatment371
Total, other adverse eventsIntensive Reading Instruction174
Total, other adverse eventsCombined ADHD Treatment and Reading Instruction568
Total, serious adverse eventsADHD Treatment071
Total, serious adverse eventsIntensive Reading Instruction074
Total, serious adverse eventsCombined ADHD Treatment and Reading Instruction068

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
33772416DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
R01HD060617Reading ICARD: Interventions for Children With Attention and Reading DisordersDENTON, CAROLYN AUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTONEUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT2010 to 2014

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed as
Sentence Verification TaskSecondary outcome

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01133847

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01133847/results?page=2