ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01137812

The CANTATA-D2 Trial (CANagliflozin Treatment And Trial Analysis - DPP-4 Inhibitor Second Comparator Trial)

NCT01137812, Phase 3, Completed, Janssen Research & Development, LLC; results first posted 2013-05-17

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. The CANTATA-D2 Trial (CANagliflozin Treatment And Trial Analysis - DPP-4 Inhibitor Second Comparator Trial). Trials, record NCT01137812. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01137812

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
The CANTATA-D2 Trial (CANagliflozin Treatment And Trial Analysis - DPP-4 Inhibitor Second Comparator Trial)
NCT number
NCT01137812
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
756 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Conditions
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Interventions
Sitagliptin 100 mg, Canagliflozin 300 mg, Metformin, Sulphonylurea
First posted
2010-06-04
Last updated
2015-01-15
Results first posted
2013-05-17

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 52Week 52
The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c \<7% at Week 52 in each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the percentage.
SecondaryChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 52Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change.
SecondaryPercent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 52Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean percent change.
SecondaryChange in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 52Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change.
SecondaryPercent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 52Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
The table below shows the mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change.
SecondaryPercent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 52Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
The table below shows the mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
This analysis used the modified intent-to-treat analysis set (all patients who were randomly assigned to a treatment group and received at least 1 dose of study drug). The last-observation-carried-forward method was applied when the Week 52 values were missing. The table includes only patients with both baseline and post baseline values.
PercentLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 52Week 52
This analysis used the modified intent-to-treat analysis set (all patients who were randomly assigned to a treatment group and received at least 1 dose of study drug). The last-observation-carried-forward method was applied when the Week 52 values were missing. The table includes only patients with both baseline and post baseline values.
Percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 52Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
This analysis used the modified intent-to-treat analysis set (all patients who were randomly assigned to a treatment group and received at least 1 dose of study drug). The last-observation-carried-forward method was applied when the Week 52 values were missing. The table includes only patients with both baseline and post baseline values.
mg/dLLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 52Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
This analysis used the modified intent-to-treat analysis set (all patients who were randomly assigned to a treatment group and received at least 1 dose of study drug). The last-observation-carried-forward method was applied when the Week 52 values were missing. The table includes only patients with both baseline and post baseline values.
Percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 52Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
This analysis used the modified intent-to-treat analysis set (all patients who were randomly assigned to a treatment group and received at least 1 dose of study drug). The last-observation-carried-forward method was applied when the Week 52 values were missing. The table includes only patients with both baseline and post baseline values.
mmHgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 52Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
This analysis used the modified intent-to-treat analysis set (all patients who were randomly assigned to a treatment group and received at least 1 dose of study drug). The last-observation-carried-forward method was applied when the Week 52 values were missing. The table includes only patients with both baseline and post baseline values.
Percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 52Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
This analysis used the modified intent-to-treat analysis set (all patients who were randomly assigned to a treatment group and received at least 1 dose of study drug). The last-observation-carried-forward method was applied when the Week 52 values were missing. The table includes only patients with both baseline and post baseline values.
Percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group14

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52Canagliflozin 300 mg-1.03Standard Error 0.048Percent
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.66Standard Error 0.049Percent
Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 52Canagliflozin 300 mg47.6Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 52Sitagliptin 100 mg35.3Percentage of patients
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 52Canagliflozin 300 mg-29.9Standard Error 2.201mg/dL
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 52Sitagliptin 100 mg-5.85Standard Error 2.232mg/dL
Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 52Canagliflozin 300 mg-2.5Standard Error 0.2Percent change
Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 52Sitagliptin 100 mg0.3Standard Error 0.2Percent change
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 52Canagliflozin 300 mg-5.06Standard Error 0.656mmHg
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 52Sitagliptin 100 mg0.85Standard Error 0.666mmHg

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCanagliflozin 300 mg377
Overall StudySTARTEDSitagliptin 100 mg378
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCanagliflozin 300 mg254
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSitagliptin 100 mg210
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCanagliflozin 300 mg123
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSitagliptin 100 mg168

Adverse events104

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersCanagliflozin 300 mg17377
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersSitagliptin 100 mg26378
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsCanagliflozin 300 mg22377
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsSitagliptin 100 mg15378
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsCanagliflozin 300 mg33377
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsSitagliptin 100 mg38378
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsCanagliflozin 300 mg33377
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsSitagliptin 100 mg21378
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsCanagliflozin 300 mg15377
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsSitagliptin 100 mg19378

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCanagliflozin 300 mg
Total, all-cause mortalitySitagliptin 100 mg
Total, other adverse eventsCanagliflozin 300 mg157377
Total, other adverse eventsSitagliptin 100 mg159378
Total, serious adverse eventsCanagliflozin 300 mg24377
Total, serious adverse eventsSitagliptin 100 mg21378

Papers8

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
23564919DERIVEDPubMed
24585202DERIVEDPubMed
25795432DERIVEDPubMed
26579834DERIVEDPubMed
26580237DERIVEDPubMed
27391951DERIVEDPubMed
27977934DERIVEDPubMed
29313267DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Canagliflozin 300 mg vs Sitagliptin 100 mg: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01137812

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01137812/events?page=2