ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01140451

Registered outcomes23

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Baseline (Week 1 [Total Study Week 48]) up to 4 Weeks Post-Treatment (Week 100 [Total Study Week 148]) or Premature Discontinuation (PD) (whichever occurred first)
A TEAE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship that occurred or worsened in the period extending from the first dose of study drug to 6 weeks after the last dose of study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an adverse event (AE) resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. AE severity was graded as follows: Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening; Grade 5: fatal. A TEAE was considered related if in the opinion of the Investigator it was possibly or probably caused by the study drug. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the Adverse Events module.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormality (TELA)Baseline (Week 1 [Total Study Week 48]) up to 4 Weeks Post-Treatment (Week 100 [Total Study Week 148]) or PD (whichever occurred first)
A TELA is any abnormal laboratory value that started or worsened after administration of study drug. Abnormal values were defined as values outside normal range. Values considered abnormal included -Hepatic: Serum total bilirubin ≥1.5\*upper limit of normal (ULN); serum gamma glutamyl transferase \>2.5\*ULN; serum alanine aminotransferase increase of \>150 units/liter (U/L) without increased creatine kinase; -Adrenal: plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone \>ULN (normal cortisol); -Renal: serum cystatin C \>1.33 milligrams (mg)/L; serum creatinine \>ULN-1.5\*ULN for age; serum blood urea nitrogen ≥1.5\*ULN; urine protein:creatinine \>0.40 mg/deciliter (dL):mg/dL; urine protein:osmolality \>0.30 mg/L:milliosmoles/kilogram; urine blood 2+; - Serum Electrolytes: serum sodium \>150 millimoles (mmol)/L, \<130 mmol/L; serum potassium \>5.5, \<3.0 mmol/L; serum magnesium \>1.23 mmol/L, \<0.5 mmol/L; total serum calcium \>2.9 mmol/L, \<2.0 mmol/L; serum phosphorous \<0.8 mmol/L; serum biocarbonate- \<16 mmol/L.
SecondaryPercentage of Predicted Function (Percent-Predicted) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at BaselineBaseline (Week 1 [Total Study Week 48])
Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function by measuring the percent-predicted, which was determined on the basis of the height value obtained at the same study visit, for FEV1 (the amount of air that can be exhaled in 1 second). Spirometry was validated by using current guidelines of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS). Baseline was defined as Week 1 or the most recent value of percent-predicted FEV1 prior to the first dose of open-label treatment in Study 009e.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted of FEV1 at Weeks 48 and 96Week 48 (Total Study Week 96), End of Treatment (EOT) (Week 96 [Total Study Week 144])
Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function by measuring the percent-predicted, which was determined on the basis of the height value obtained at the same study visit, for FEV1 (the amount of air that can be exhaled in 1 second). Spirometry was validated by using current guidelines of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS). The percentage of change in percent-predicted of FEV1 was calculated as follows: ((percent-predicted FEV1-Baseline percent-predicted FEV1)/Baseline percent-predicted FEV1)\*100. Baseline was defined as Week 1 or the most recent value of percent-predicted FEV1 prior to the first dose of open-label treatment in Study 009e. A positive change from Baseline indicates that FEV1 improved.
SecondaryPercent-Predicted of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at BaselineBaseline (Week 1 [Total Study Week 48])
Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function by measuring the percent-predicted, which was determined on the basis of the height value obtained at the same study visit, for FVC (the amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath). Spirometry was validated by using current guidelines of the ATS and ERS. Baseline was defined as Week 1 or the most recent value of percent-predicted FVC prior to the first dose of open-label treatment in Study 009e.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted of FVC at Weeks 48 and 96Week 48 (Total Study Week 96), EOT (Week 96 [Total Study Week 144])
Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function by measuring the percent-predicted, which was determined on the basis of the height value obtained at the same study visit, for FVC (the amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath). Spirometry was validated by using current guidelines of the ATS and ERS. The percentage of change in percent-predicted of FVC was calculated as follows: ((percent-predicted FVC-Baseline percent-predicted FVC)/Baseline percent-predicted FVC)\*100. Baseline was defined as Week 1 or the most recent value of percent-predicted FVC prior to the first dose of open-label treatment in Study 009e. A positive change from Baseline indicates that FVC improved.
SecondaryPercent-Predicted of Forced Expiratory Flow Between 25% and 75% of Expiration (FEF25-75) at BaselineBaseline (Week 1 [Total Study Week 48])
Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function by measuring the percent-predicted, which was determined on the basis of the height value obtained at the same study visit, for FEF25-75 (the rate of air flow during the middle part of an exhalation). Spirometry was validated by using current guidelines of the ATS and ERS. Baseline was defined as Week 1 or the most recent value of percent-predicted FEF25-75 prior to the first dose of open-label treatment in Study 009e.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted of FEF25-75 at Weeks 48 and 96Week 48 (Total Study Week 96), EOT (Week 96 [Total Study Week 144])
Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function by measuring the percent-predicted, which was determined on the basis of the height value obtained at the same study visit, for FEF25-75 (the rate of air flow during the middle part of an exhalation). Spirometry was validated by using current guidelines of the ATS and ERS. The percentage of change in percent-predicted of FEF25-75 was calculated as follows: ((percent-predicted FEF25-75-Baseline percent-predicted FEF25-75)/Baseline percent-predicted FEF25-75)\*100. Baseline was defined as Week 1 or the most recent value of percent-predicted FEF25-75 prior to the first dose of open-label treatment in Study 009e. A positive change from Baseline indicates that FEF25-75 improved.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Pulmonary Exacerbations as Defined by Modified Fuch's CriteriaBaseline (Week 1 [Total Study Week 48]) up to Week 48 and EOT (Week 96) (Total Study Weeks 96 and 144)
A Respiratory Event Form (REF), which collected data on various signs, symptoms, and effects for each event, was completed by the Investigator when informed by the participant of a respiratory event. Pulmonary exacerbations were assessed by using the modified Fuchs' criteria, which defines an exacerbation as a respiratory event requiring treatment with parenteral antibiotics for any 4 of the following 12 symptoms with or without intravenous (IV) antibiotics: change in sputum; new or increased hemoptysis; increased cough; increased dyspnea; fatigue; temperature \>38°C; anorexia; sinus pain; change in sinus discharge; change in physical examination of the chest; or decrease in pulmonary function by 10% or more from a previously recorded value; or radiographic changes indicative of pulmonary function.
SecondaryRate of Pulmonary Exacerbations as Defined by Modified Fuch's Criteria Over 48 WeeksBaseline (Week 1 [Total Study Week 48]) up to Week 48 (Total Study Week 96)
A REF, which collected data on various signs, symptoms, and effects for each event, was completed by the Investigator when informed by the participant of a respiratory event. Pulmonary function was assessed by using the modified Fuchs' criteria, which defines an exacerbation as a respiratory event requiring treatment with parenteral antibiotics for any 4 of the following 12 symptoms with or without treatment with IV antibiotics: change in sputum; new or increased hemoptysis; increased cough; increased dyspnea; fatigue; temperature \>38°C; anorexia; sinus pain; change in sinus discharge; change in physical examination of the chest; decrease in pulmonary function by 10% or more from a previously recorded value; or radiographic changes indicative of pulmonary function. The 48-week exacerbation rate was determined by adding the weekly rates for each arm for each 48-week period and dividing the sum by 48.
SecondaryDuration of Pulmonary Exacerbations as Defined by Modified Fuch's CriteriaWeeks 43 up to 48 and Weeks 91 up to 96 (Total Study Weeks 91 up to 96 and Weeks 139 up to 144)
A REF, which collected data on various signs, symptoms, and effects for each event, was completed by the Investigator when informed by the participant of a respiratory event. Pulmonary function was assessed by using the modified Fuchs' criteria, which defines an exacerbation as a respiratory event requiring treatment with parenteral antibiotics for any 4 of the following 12 symptoms with or without treatment with IV antibiotics: change in sputum; new or increased hemoptysis; increased cough; increased dyspnea; fatigue; temperature \>38°C; anorexia; sinus pain; change in sinus discharge; change in physical examination of the chest; decrease in pulmonary function by 10% or more from a previously recorded value; or radiographic changes indicative of pulmonary function. Duration over a 5-week interval is presented. The duration was calculated as follows: estimated date of return to a stable state (as determined by the Investigator) - estimated date of onset of symptoms.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Severe Pulmonary Exacerbations as Defined by Modified Fuch's CriteriaWeeks 43 up to 48 and Weeks 91 up to 96 (Total Study Weeks 91 up to 96 and Weeks 139 up to 144)
A REF, which collected data on various signs, symptoms, and effects for each event, was completed by the Investigator when informed by the participant of a respiratory event. Pulmonary function was assessed by using the modified Fuchs' criteria, which defines an exacerbation as a respiratory event requiring treatment with parenteral antibiotics for any 4 of the following 12 symptoms with or without treatment with IV antibiotics: change in sputum; new or increased hemoptysis; increased cough; increased dyspnea; fatigue; temperature \>38°C; anorexia; sinus pain; change in sinus discharge; change in physical examination of the chest; decrease in pulmonary function by 10% or more from a previously recorded value; or radiographic changes indicative of pulmonary function. Severity of pulmonary exacerbations over a 5-week interval is presented. The severity of pulmonary exacerbations were graded as mild, moderate, or severe.
SecondaryChange From Baseline for the Respiratory Domain Score of the Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) at Weeks 48 and 96Baseline (Week 1 [Total Study Week 48]), Week 48 (Total Study Week 96), EOT (Week 96 [Total Study Week 144])
The CFQ-R consists of 44 items, including generic scales of physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, health perceptions, emotional functioning, and social functioning, and CF-specific scales of respiratory and digestive symptoms, body image, eating disturbances, and treatment burden. Questions are scored on a scale from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL). For some questions, the scale was reversed, so that 1 indicated better QOL. Domain scores were linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better QOL. Domain scores were calculated by using the following formula: 100 \* (sum of responses - minimum possible sum)/ (maximum possible sum - minimum possible sum). The minimum possible sum = number of questions \* 1; the maximum possible = the number of questions \* 4. Baseline was Week 1. A negative change from Baseline indicates that health has worsened. Participants may have switched age groups during the study.
SecondaryRate of Study Drug ComplianceBaseline (Week 1 [Total Study Week 48]) up to EOT (Week 96 [Total Study Week 144])
The rate of compliance was defined as the number of actual doses taken divided by the number of planned doses \* 100. Participant-reported data were obtained from the participant's compliance log, which was completed by the participant or the caregiver. The participant or caregiver reported how many doses were taken. Compliance by drug accountability was determined by counting used and unused study drug sachets. All calculations were based on the records of the first dose date to the last dose date.
SecondaryPredose Concentration of AtalurenPredose at Weeks 1, 16, 32, 48, 64, 80 and EOT (Week 96) (Total Study Weeks 48, 64, 80 96, 112, 128, and 144, respectively)
Blood samples were drawn immediately before administration of the first daily dose (dose taken with breakfast) of ataluren. Whenever possible, the predose sample was to be obtained within 15 minutes of study ataluren administration.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Required Interventions for Pulmonary SymptomsBaseline (Week 1 [Total Study Week 48]) up to EOT (Week 96 [Total Study Week 144])
During treatment, any interventions including hospitalization or use of oral, inhaled, or IV antibiotics was documented if it was due to an exacerbation-like episode. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the Adverse Events module.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Disruptions in Activities of Daily Living Because of Pulmonary SymptomsBaseline (Week 1 [Total Study Week 48]) up to EOT (Week 96 [Total Study Week 144])
During treatment, participants reported when they missed school or work because of pulmonary symptoms. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the Adverse Events module.
SecondaryDuration of Disruptions in Activities of Daily Living Because of Pulmonary SymptomsBaseline (Week 1 [Total Study Week 48]) up to EOT (Week 96 [Total Study Week 144])
During treatment, participants reported when they missed school or work because of pulmonary symptoms. If Event Date was before Day 1 (Baseline) Date, Study Day = Event Date - First Dose Date. If Event Date was on or after Day 1 Date, Study Day = Event Date - First Dose Date + 1. The Duration = Return to Stable Date - Onset Date. Participants with a respiratory event that was ongoing when the participant was discontinued from the study were considered as not evaluable. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the Adverse Events module.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Weeks 48 and 96Baseline (Week 1 [Total Study Week 48]), Week 48 (Total Study Week 96), EOT (Week 96 [Total Study Week 144])
Participants were weighed, and the weight was recorded at Baseline and then every 8 weeks during the treatment period. Baseline was Week 1. A positive change from Baseline indicates that weight increased.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Weeks 48 and 96Baseline (Week 1 [Total Study Week 48]), Week 48 (Total Study Week 96), EOT (Week 96 [Total Study Week 144])
Participants were weighed and measured and the weight and height were recorded at each visit. The BMI was determined by dividing the participant's weight by his or her height. Baseline was Week 1. A positive change from Baseline indicates that BMI increased.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01140451/registered