ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01167153

Effectiveness of Valsartan/Amlodipine (EXforge®) and Nifedipine treAtment coMparison in Treating Chinese Hypertensive Patients

NCT01167153, Phase 4, Completed, Novartis; results first posted 2012-06-01

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Effectiveness of Valsartan/Amlodipine (EXforge®) and Nifedipine treAtment coMparison in Treating Chinese Hypertensive Patients. Trials, record NCT01167153. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01167153

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Effectiveness of Valsartan/Amlodipine (EXforge®) and Nifedipine treAtment coMparison in Treating Chinese Hypertensive Patients
NCT number
NCT01167153
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
564 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis
Conditions
Hypertension
Interventions
Valsartan/Amlodipine, Nifedipine
First posted
2010-07-22
Last updated
2012-06-01
Results first posted
2012-06-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) at the Study End Point (12 Weeks)Baseline, 12 weeks
The sitting blood pressure was trough value (23-26 hours after drug administration) measured by sphygmomanometer. Blood pressure was measured on both arms and the arm with higher mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP) was used at visit 1 and following visits. Measurement of blood pressure was carried out 3 times at each visit on the selected arm. The results and mean value of three sitting blood pressures were recorded for analysis.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) at the Study End Point (12 Weeks)Baseline, 12 weeks
The sitting blood pressure was trough value (23-26 hours after drug administration) measured by sphygmomanometer. Blood pressure was measured on both arms and the arm with higher msDBP was used at visit 1 and following visits. Measurement of blood pressure was carried out 3 times at each visit on the selected arm. The results and mean value of three sitting blood pressures were recorded for analysis.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Effective Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) Control Rate and Effective Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Control Rate at the Study End Point (12 Weeks)Baseline, 12 weeks
Effective SBP control rate was defined as proportion of subjects in whom MSSBP \< 140 mmHg or MSSBP reduction ≥ 20 mmHg from baseline. Effective DBP control rate was defined as proportion of subjects in whom MSDBP \< 90 mmHg or MSDBP reduction ≥10 mmHg from baseline.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients in Whom Blood Pressure Target Was Achieved at the Study End Point at 12 Weeks12 weeksBlood Pressure (BP) target was defined as mean sitting BP\<140/90 mm Hg in non-diabetic patients and\<130/80 mm Hg in diabetic patients at 12 weeks.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Orthostatic SBP and DBP at 12 WeeksBaseline, 12 weeks
The arm with higher sitting blood pressure was selected for all examinations throughout the study. Orthostatic blood pressure was measured when subject stood for 1 minute. Orthostatic blood pressures were measured at screening and each visit.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Sitting Pulse at 12 WeeksBaseline, 12 weeksSitting pulse was measured by sphygmomanometer after subject sat for 5 minutes at clinic during each visit.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Orthostatic Pulse at 12 WeeksBaseline, 12 weeksOrthostatic pulse was measured by sphygmomanometer when subject stood for 1 minute at clinic during each visit.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) at the Study End Point (12 Weeks)Baseline, 12 weeksITT (intention to treatment) population: all randomised subjects who had baseline assessment and at least one assessment record of MSSBP after baseline.mm HgMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) at the Study End Point (12 Weeks)Baseline, 12 weeksITT (intention to treatment) population: all randomised subjects who had baseline assessment and at least one assessment record of MSDBP after baseline.mm HgMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With Effective Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) Control Rate and Effective Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Control Rate at the Study End Point (12 Weeks)Baseline, 12 weeksITT (intention to treatment) population: all randomised subjects who had baseline assessment and at least one assessment record of effective BP control after baseline.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients in Whom Blood Pressure Target Was Achieved at the Study End Point at 12 Weeks12 weeksITT (intention to treatment) population: all randomised subjects who had baseline assessment and at least one assessment record of blood pressure control after baselinePercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Orthostatic SBP and DBP at 12 WeeksBaseline, 12 weeksITT (intention to treatment) population: all randomised subjects who had baseline assessment and at least one assessment record of orthostatic SBP and DBP after baseline.mm HgMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Sitting Pulse at 12 WeeksBaseline, 12 weeksITT (intention to treatment) population: all randomised subjects who had baseline assessment and at least one assessment record of sitting pulse rate after baseline.beats/minMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Orthostatic Pulse at 12 WeeksBaseline, 12 weeksITT (intention to treatment) population: all randomised subjects who had baseline assessment and at least one assessment record of orthostatic pulse rate after baseline.beats/minMEAN

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) at the Study End Point (12 Weeks)Valsartan/Amlodipine-16.8Standard Deviation 11.69mm Hg
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) at the Study End Point (12 Weeks)Nifedipine-10.6Standard Deviation 12.02mm Hg
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) at the Study End Point (12 Weeks)Valsartan/Amlodipine-8.5Standard Deviation 8.52mm Hg
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) at the Study End Point (12 Weeks)Nifedipine-4.8Standard Deviation 8.89mm Hg
Percentage of Patients With Effective Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) Control Rate and Effective Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Control Rate at the Study End Point (12 Weeks)Valsartan/AmlodipineAchieving Effective SBP Control82.40Percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients With Effective Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) Control Rate and Effective Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Control Rate at the Study End Point (12 Weeks)NifedipineAchieving Effective SBP Control63.40Percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients With Effective Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) Control Rate and Effective Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Control Rate at the Study End Point (12 Weeks)Valsartan/AmlodipineAchieving Effective DBP Control92.88Percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients With Effective Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) Control Rate and Effective Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Control Rate at the Study End Point (12 Weeks)NifedipineAchieving Effective DBP Control76.98Percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients in Whom Blood Pressure Target Was Achieved at the Study End Point at 12 WeeksValsartan/Amlodipine79.03Percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients in Whom Blood Pressure Target Was Achieved at the Study End Point at 12 WeeksNifedipine57.36Percentage of participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDValsartan/Amlodipine282
Overall StudySTARTEDNifedipine282
Overall StudyIntention to Treat (ITT)Valsartan/Amlodipine272
Overall StudyIntention to Treat (ITT)Nifedipine268
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDValsartan/Amlodipine264
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNifedipine249
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDValsartan/Amlodipine18
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDNifedipine33

Adverse events6

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDizzyNervous system disordersValsartan/Amlodipine11282
otherDizzyNervous system disordersNifedipine15282
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersValsartan/Amlodipine6282
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersNifedipine20282
seriousUnstable Blood PressureCardiac disordersValsartan/Amlodipine0282
seriousUnstable Blood PressureCardiac disordersNifedipine1282

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityValsartan/Amlodipine
Total, all-cause mortalityNifedipine
Total, other adverse eventsValsartan/Amlodipine14282
Total, other adverse eventsNifedipine32282
Total, serious adverse eventsValsartan/Amlodipine0282
Total, serious adverse eventsNifedipine1282

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
23963546DERIVEDPubMed
33734121DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Valsartan/Amlodipine vs Nifedipine: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01167153

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01167153/registered