ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01168973

A Study of Chemotherapy and Ramucirumab Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Second Line Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Participants Who Received Prior First Line Platinum-based Chemotherapy

NCT01168973, Phase 3, Completed, Eli Lilly and Company; results first posted 2014-12-29

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Chemotherapy and Ramucirumab Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Second Line Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Participants Who Received Prior First Line Platinum-based Chemotherapy. Trials, record NCT01168973. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01168973

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Chemotherapy and Ramucirumab Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Second Line Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Participants Who Received Prior First Line Platinum-based Chemotherapy
NCT number
NCT01168973
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,253 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Eli Lilly and Company
Conditions
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Interventions
Ramucirumab, Placebo (for Ramucirumab), Docetaxel
First posted
2010-07-23
Last updated
2019-09-25
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2010-021297-11
Results first posted
2014-12-29
Limitations and caveats
Three participants randomized to placebo and docetaxel received 1 dose of ramucirumab in error. They are included in the placebo and docetaxel arm in the ITT population and are included in the ramucirumab and docetaxel arm in the Safety population.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverall SurvivalRandomization to date of death from any cause (up to 34 months)
Overall survival was the time from randomization until the date of death from any cause. Participants who were alive at the end of the follow-up period (or lost to follow-up) were censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive.
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS) TimeRandomization to measured PD or date of death from any cause (up to 29 months)
PFS time was the time from randomization until the date of objectively determined progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the 20% relative increase, the sum must have also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm). The appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions was also considered progression. Participants without objectively determined PD who were alive at the end of the follow-up period (or lost to follow-up) were censored on the date of the participant's last complete radiographic tumor assessment; if no baseline or post-baseline radiologic assessment was available, the participant was censored at the date of randomization.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving an Objective Response (Objective Response Rate)Baseline to measured PD (up to 29 months)
Participants achieved an objective response if they had a best overall response of partial response (PR) or complete response (CR). According to RECIST v1.1, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions (including the short axes of any target lymph node), taking as reference the baseline sum diameter; CR was the disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions, with the short axes of any target lymph node reduced to \<10 mm, the disappearance of all nontarget lesions, and the normalization of tumor marker levels \[if tumor markers were initially above the upper limit of normal (ULN)\]. The percentage of participants who achieved an objective response=(number of participants with CR or PR)/(number of participants assessed)\*100.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Disease Control (Disease Control Rate)Baseline to measured PD (up to 29 months)
Participants achieved disease control if they had a best overall response of PR, CR or stable disease (SD). According to RECIST v1.1, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions (including the short axes of any target lymph node), taking as reference the baseline sum diameter; CR was the disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions, with the short axes of any target lymph node reduced to \<10 mm, the disappearance of all nontarget lesions, and the normalization of tumor marker levels (if tumor markers were initially above the ULN). SD was neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify as PR nor sufficient increase to qualify as PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameter since treatment started. The percentage of participants who achieved disease control=(number of participants with CR, PR, or SD)/(number of participants assessed)\*100.
SecondaryMaximum Improvement on Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)Baseline, Day 21 of each cycle, and 30 days following last infusion (up to Cycle 38, 21 days/cycle)
The LCSS consisted of 9 items: 6 items focused on lung cancer symptoms \[loss of appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnea (shortness of breath), hemoptysis (blood in sputum), and pain\] and 3 items were global items (symptom distress, interference with activity level, and global quality of life). Participant responses to each item were measured using visual analogue scales (VAS) with 100-mm lines. A higher score for any item represented a higher level of symptoms/problems. The Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) was the mean of the 6 symptom items of the LCSS, and the Total LCSS was the mean of all 9 LCSS items. ASBI and Total LCSS were not computed for a participant if he/she had 1 or more missing values for the 6 and 9 items, respectively. Maximum improvement in LCSS scores, ASBI, and Total LCSS score was the largest decrease from baseline for each variable, which was the smallest (most negative or smallest positive) non-missing value among all change from baseline values for each variable.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to 30-Day Follow-Up Visit on European Quality of Life Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State ScoresBaseline, 30 days following last infusion (up to Cycle 38, 21 days/cycle)
The EQ-5D is a quality-of-life instrument that consists of 2 parts. The first part (Health State Index score) allowed participants to rate their health state in 5 health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression using a scale from 1 to 3 (no problem, some problems, and extreme problems, respectively). These combinations of attributes were converted into a weighted Health State Index score according to a United Kingdom population-based algorithm; the possible values for the Health State Index score ranged from -0.59 (severe problems in all 5 dimensions) to 1.0 (no problem in any dimension). The second part of the EQ-5D was a VAS that allowed participants to rate their present health condition. Possible EQ-5D VAS scores ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
SecondaryMaximum and Minimum Serum Concentrations (Cmax and Cmin) of RamucirumabPrior to infusion and 1 hour following infusion for 4 and 8 (cycles 3 and 5 at 21 days/cycle)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Anti-Ramucirumab AntibodiesBaseline, prior to infusion for week 4 and 8 (cycles 3 and 5), and 30 days following last infusion (up to Cycle 38, 21 days/cycle)
The number of participants who had treatment-emergent or follow-up emergent anti-drug antibodies (ADA) is reported. Participants with treatment-emergent ADA were defined as participants who had any sample from baseline through Cycle 5 pre-infusion that was a 4-fold increase (2 dilution increase) in immunogenicity titer over the baseline titer, or participants who tested negative at baseline and positive post-baseline (at titer of ≥1:20). Participants with follow-up emergent ADA were defined as participants who had any sample during 30 days post last infusion that was a 4-fold increase (2 dilution increase) in immunogenicity titer over the baseline titer.
OtherNumber of Participants Who Had Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) or DiedFirst infusion up to 30 days following last infusion (up to Cycle 38, 21 days/cycle)
Data presented are the number of participants who experienced at least 1 TEAE, Grade 3, 4, or 5 TEAE, treatment-emergent serious adverse event (SAE), TEAE leading to discontinuation of study treatment (ramucirumab/placebo or docetaxel), and TEAE leading to death. Clinically significant events were defined as treatment-emergent SAEs and other non-serious adverse events (AEs) regardless of causality. A summary of SAEs and other non-serious AEs, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYOverall SurvivalRandomization to date of death from any cause (up to 34 months)
Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: All randomized participants grouped according to their assigned treatment at randomization. Participants censored: ramucirumab and docetaxel arm = 200 participants; placebo and docetaxel arm = 169 participants.
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYProgression-Free Survival (PFS) TimeRandomization to measured PD or date of death from any cause (up to 29 months)
ITT population: All randomized participants grouped according to their assigned treatment at randomization. Participants censored: ramucirumab and docetaxel arm = 70 participants; placebo and docetaxel arm = 42 participants.
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving an Objective Response (Objective Response Rate)Baseline to measured PD (up to 29 months)ITT population: All randomized participants grouped according to their assigned treatment at randomization.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving Disease Control (Disease Control Rate)Baseline to measured PD (up to 29 months)ITT population: All randomized participants grouped according to their assigned treatment at randomization.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMaximum Improvement on Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)Baseline, Day 21 of each cycle, and 30 days following last infusion (up to Cycle 38, 21 days/cycle)Randomized participants grouped according to their assigned treatment at randomization, who had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline LCSS score.mmMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to 30-Day Follow-Up Visit on European Quality of Life Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State ScoresBaseline, 30 days following last infusion (up to Cycle 38, 21 days/cycle)Randomized participants grouped according to their assigned treatment at randomization, who had an EQ-5D assessment at a baseline and 30 days post treatment.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMaximum and Minimum Serum Concentrations (Cmax and Cmin) of RamucirumabPrior to infusion and 1 hour following infusion for 4 and 8 (cycles 3 and 5 at 21 days/cycle)Participants assigned to the ramucirumab and docetaxel arm at randomization, who had evaluable ramucirumab pharmacokinetic (PK) data to calculate Cmax and Cmin.micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)GEOMETRIC_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Anti-Ramucirumab AntibodiesBaseline, prior to infusion for week 4 and 8 (cycles 3 and 5), and 30 days following last infusion (up to Cycle 38, 21 days/cycle)Randomized participants who received any quantity of study treatment, grouped by the treatment they actually received, who had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline ADA assessment.participantsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDNumber of Participants Who Had Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) or DiedFirst infusion up to 30 days following last infusion (up to Cycle 38, 21 days/cycle)Safety population: Randomized participants who received any quantity of study drug, grouped by the treatment they actually received.participantsNUMBER

Results by group56

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Overall SurvivalRamucirumab and Docetaxel10.595% Confidence Interval 9.5 to 11.2months
Overall SurvivalPlacebo and Docetaxel9.195% Confidence Interval 8.4 to 10.0months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) TimeRamucirumab and Docetaxel4.595% Confidence Interval 4.2 to 5.3months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) TimePlacebo and Docetaxel3.095% Confidence Interval 2.8 to 3.9months
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Objective Response (Objective Response Rate)Ramucirumab and Docetaxel22.995% Confidence Interval 19.7 to 26.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Objective Response (Objective Response Rate)Placebo and Docetaxel13.695% Confidence Interval 11.0 to 16.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Control (Disease Control Rate)Ramucirumab and Docetaxel64.095% Confidence Interval 60.1 to 67.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Control (Disease Control Rate)Placebo and Docetaxel52.695% Confidence Interval 48.6 to 56.6percentage of participants
Maximum Improvement on Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)Ramucirumab and DocetaxelLoss of Appetite (n=473, 471)-10.9Standard Deviation 26.11mm
Maximum Improvement on Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)Placebo and DocetaxelLoss of Appetite (n=473, 471)-11.0Standard Deviation 26.22mm

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRamucirumab and Docetaxel628
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo and Docetaxel625
Overall StudyReceived Any Quantity of Any Study DrugRamucirumab and Docetaxel624
Overall StudyReceived Any Quantity of Any Study DrugPlacebo and Docetaxel621
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRamucirumab and Docetaxel15
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo and Docetaxel14
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRamucirumab and Docetaxel613
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo and Docetaxel611

Adverse events670

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRamucirumab and Docetaxel135627306
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo and Docetaxel174618399
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRamucirumab and Docetaxel79627259
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo and Docetaxel68618151
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRamucirumab and Docetaxel228627547
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo and Docetaxel188618415
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRamucirumab and Docetaxel51627114
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo and Docetaxel2761848
otherLacrimation increasedEye disordersRamucirumab and Docetaxel85627100
otherLacrimation increasedEye disordersPlacebo and Docetaxel2961831

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRamucirumab and Docetaxel
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo and Docetaxel
Total, other adverse eventsRamucirumab and Docetaxel601627
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo and Docetaxel583618
Total, serious adverse eventsRamucirumab and Docetaxel284627
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo and Docetaxel281618

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
22853980DERIVEDPubMed
24933332DERIVEDPubMed
31958290DERIVEDPubMed
35930972DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Ramucirumab and Docetaxel vs Placebo and Docetaxel: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01168973

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01168973/results?page=2