ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01174823

Safety and Efficacy of Bepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution in Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis Patients

NCT01174823, Phase 2, Completed, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated; results first posted 2020-09-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy of Bepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution in Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis Patients. Trials, record NCT01174823. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01174823

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy of Bepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution in Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis Patients
NCT number
NCT01174823
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
245 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Conditions
Allergic Conjunctivitis
Interventions
bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution, placebo comparator ophthalmic solution
First posted
2010-08-04
Last updated
2020-09-14
Results first posted
2020-09-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryRhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) - Mean Change in Total ScoreBaseline, 14 days
Responses to questions relating to symptoms and daily activities in the RQLQ were provided for 28 questions encompassing the 7 major domains of activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional state. Each response to an RQLQ question was provided on a scale of 0-6 units, where 0 = not troubled/none of the time and 6 = extremely troubled/all of the time. The minimum total score was 0 units and the maximum total score was 42 units, with higher score indicating decreased quality of life due to rhinoconjunctivitis.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Reflective Ocular Itching Scores Over the Treatment PeriodBaseline, 14 days
Ocular itching was graded on a 4-point scale (0-3 units; 0=Absent, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe) twice daily in the Screening Diary (Day -7 to Day -1) and the Subject Diary (Day 0 prior to first dose through Day 13).
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Instantaneous Ocular Redness Scores Over the Treatment PeriodBaseline, 14 days
Ocular redness each was graded on a 4-point scale (0-3 units; 0=Absent, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe) twice daily in the Screening Diary (Day -7 to Day -1) and the Subject Diary (Day 0 prior to first dose through Day 13).
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Proportion of Tearing Episodes Over the Treatment PeriodBaseline, 14 days
Individual nasal symptoms and ocular itching and redness each were graded on a 4-point scale (0-3 units; 0=Absent, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe) BID in the Screening Diary (Day -7 to Day -1) and BID in the Subject Diary (Day 0 prior to first dose through Day 13). Tearing was scored from Day 0 as either absent or present at the same time as nasal and other ocular symptoms were graded. The proportion of participants was calculated and then then average of the proportions.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores Over the Treatment PeriodBaseline, 14 days
Individual nasal symptoms of rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing each were each graded on a 4-point scale (0-3 units; 0=Absent, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe) twice daily in the Screening Diary (Day -7 to Day -1) and the Subject Diary (Day 0 prior to first dose through Day 13). The minimum Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) was 0 units and the maximum TNSS corresponding to multiple individual nasal symptoms scored as severe was 12 units
SecondaryGlobal Therapeutic Response Rating - Participant Assessed14 days
Participants were asked if they felt that they had experienced improvement in allergy symptoms after therapy. Participant assessed global therapeutic response rating: categories that the participant could select were 'no change', 'slight improvement', 'improved', or 'marked improvement'.
SecondaryGlobal Therapeutic Response Rating - Investigator Assessed14 days
Investigators were asked if they felt that the participant had experienced improvement in allergy symptoms after therapy. Investigator assessed global therapeutic response rating: categories that the investigator could select were 'no change', 'slight improvement', 'improved', or 'marked improvement'.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYRhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) - Mean Change in Total ScoreBaseline, 14 days
The per protocol population included randomized participants with no major protocol violations, who had at least 80% dosing compliance during the 2-week dosing period and at least 85% compliance in providing nasal and ocular symptom grades in the Subject Diary, and who completed the RQLQ at Day 0 and Day 14 (+2).
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Reflective Ocular Itching Scores Over the Treatment PeriodBaseline, 14 days
The per protocol population included randomized participants with no major protocol violations, who had at least 80% dosing compliance during the 2-week dosing period and at least 85% compliance in providing nasal and ocular symptom grades in the Subject Diary, and who completed the RQLQ at Day 0 and Day 14 (+2).
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Instantaneous Ocular Redness Scores Over the Treatment PeriodBaseline, 14 days
The per protocol population included randomized participants with no major protocol violations, who had at least 80% dosing compliance during the 2-week dosing period and at least 85% compliance in providing nasal and ocular symptom grades in the Subject Diary, and who completed the RQLQ at Day 0 and Day 14 (+2).
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Proportion of Tearing Episodes Over the Treatment PeriodBaseline, 14 days
The per protocol population included randomized participants with no major protocol violations, who had at least 80% dosing compliance during the 2-week dosing period, who had at least 85% compliance in providing nasal and ocular symptom grades in the Subject Diary, and who completed the questionnaire at Day 0 and Day 14 (+2).
tearing episodesMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores Over the Treatment PeriodBaseline, 14 days
The per protocol population included randomized participants with no major protocol violations, who had at least 80% dosing compliance during the 2-week dosing period and at least 85% compliance in providing nasal and ocular symptom grades in the Subject Diary, and who completed the questionnaire at Day 0 and Day 14 (+2).
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYGlobal Therapeutic Response Rating - Participant Assessed14 days
The per protocol population included randomized participants with no major protocol violations, who had at least 80% dosing compliance during the 2-week dosing period and at least 85% compliance in providing nasal and ocular symptom grades in the Subject Diary, and who completed the RQLQ at Day 0 and Day 14 (+2).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYGlobal Therapeutic Response Rating - Investigator Assessed14 days
The per protocol population included randomized participants with no major protocol violations, who had at least 80% dosing compliance during the 2-week dosing period and at least 85% compliance in providing nasal and ocular symptom grades in the Subject Diary, and who completed the RQLQ at Day 0 and Day 14 (+2).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) - Mean Change in Total ScorePlacebo-1.18Standard Deviation 1.24score on a scale
Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) - Mean Change in Total ScoreBepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution-1.17Standard Deviation 1.27score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Reflective Ocular Itching Scores Over the Treatment PeriodPlacebo-0.54Standard Deviation 0.58score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Reflective Ocular Itching Scores Over the Treatment PeriodBepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution-0.71Standard Deviation 0.65score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Instantaneous Ocular Redness Scores Over the Treatment PeriodPlacebo-0.45Standard Deviation 0.61score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Instantaneous Ocular Redness Scores Over the Treatment PeriodBepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution-0.62Standard Deviation 0.57score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Proportion of Tearing Episodes Over the Treatment PeriodPlacebo-0.15Standard Deviation 0.244tearing episodes
Mean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Proportion of Tearing Episodes Over the Treatment PeriodBepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution-0.18Standard Deviation 0.269tearing episodes
Mean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores Over the Treatment PeriodPlacebo-1.73Standard Deviation 1.94score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores Over the Treatment PeriodBepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution-2.08Standard Deviation 2.06score on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo122
Overall StudySTARTEDBepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution123
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo115
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution119
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo7
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution4

Adverse events4

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherMild taste following instillationGeneral disordersPlacebo1121
otherMild taste following instillationGeneral disordersBepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution10123
seriousLocalized infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo1121
seriousLocalized infectionInfections and infestationsBepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution0123

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo0121
Total, all-cause mortalityBepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution0123
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1121
Total, other adverse eventsBepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution10123
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo1121
Total, serious adverse eventsBepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution0123

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
23484763DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Bepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Bepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01174823

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01174823/registered