ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01176058

A Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Anidulafungin Vs. Fluconazole In The Treatment Of Patients With Candidemia And/Or Other Forms Of Invasive Candidiasis

NCT01176058, Phase 3, Terminated, Pfizer; results first posted 2015-09-21

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Anidulafungin Vs. Fluconazole In The Treatment Of Patients With Candidemia And/Or Other Forms Of Invasive Candidiasis. Trials, record NCT01176058. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01176058

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Anidulafungin Vs. Fluconazole In The Treatment Of Patients With Candidemia And/Or Other Forms Of Invasive Candidiasis
NCT number
NCT01176058
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
17 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Candidemia
Interventions
Anidulafungin/Fluconazole
First posted
2010-08-05
Last updated
2015-10-28
Results first posted
2015-09-21
Limitations and caveats
Due to small enrollment, the per-protocol population was not determined, and analysis was performed on the mITT population.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIT)End of Intravenous Treatment (Up to Day 42)
Global response included clinical and microbiological success or failure. Success - clinical success (defined as the resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of invasive candidiasis) and microbiological success (defined as the eradication of Candida species present at baseline, as determined on follow-up culture, or the presumed eradication, if culture data were not available \[N/A\] for a participant with a successful clinical response). Failure - Any case that did not meet the criteria for success.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)End of Treatment (Up to Day 42)
Global response included clinical and microbiological success or failure. Success - clinical success (defined as the resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of invasive candidiasis) and microbiological success (defined as the eradication of Candida species present at baseline, as determined on follow-up culture, or the presumed eradication, if culture data were N/A for a participant with a successful clinical response). Failure - Any case that did not meet the criteria for success.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOITEnd of Intravenous Treatment (Up to Day 42)
Clinical response included success and failure. Success included Cure (resolution of signs and symptoms of the Candida infection) and Improvement (significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection). Failure defined as No significant improvement in signs and symptoms or death due to Candida infection or circumstances prevented an evaluation from being made.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOTEnd of Treatment (Up to Day 42)
Clinical response included success and failure. Success included Cure (resolution of signs and symptoms of the Candida infection) and Improvement (significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection). Failure defined as No significant improvement in signs and symptoms or death due to Candida infection or circumstances prevented an evaluation from being made.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Follow-UpPost treatment follow-up visit (Up to Day 52)
Clinical response included success and failure. Success included Cure (resolution of signs and symptoms of the Candida infection) and Improvement (significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection). Failure defined as No significant improvement in signs and symptoms or death due to Candida infection or circumstances prevented an evaluation from being made.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOITEnd of Intravenous Treatment (Up to Day 42)
Microbiological Success implies Eradication: culture negative for all Candida species present at baseline (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed). Microbiological Failure implies (1) Persistence: baseline Candida species present in repeat cultures (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); (2) Recurrence: baseline Candida species isolated following eradication (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); or (3) Indeterminate: culture data N/A (loss to follow-up or death that was not due to candidiasis or candidemia).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOTEnd of Treatment (Up to Day 42)
Microbiological Success implies Eradication: culture negative for all Candida species present at baseline (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed). Microbiological Failure implies (1) Persistence: baseline Candida species present in repeat cultures (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); (2) Recurrence: baseline Candida species isolated following eradication (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); or (3) Indeterminate: culture data N/A (loss to follow-up or death that was not due to candidiasis or candidemia).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at Follow-UpPost treatment follow-up visit (Up to Day 52)
Microbiological Success implies Eradication: culture negative for all Candida species present at baseline (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed). Microbiological Failure implies (1) Persistence: baseline Candida species present in repeat cultures (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); (2) Recurrence: baseline Candida species isolated following eradication (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); or (3) Indeterminate: culture data N/A (loss to follow-up or death that was not due to candidiasis or candidemia).
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who DiedBaseline to Day 52

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIT)End of Intravenous Treatment (Up to Day 42)
Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) population: participants had confirmed diagnosis of candidemia or other forms of invasive candidiasis, received at least 1 dose of study medication treatment, had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy evaluation. N=number of participants with evaluable data; participants with missing or indeterminate data set to Failure.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)End of Treatment (Up to Day 42)MITT population. N=number of participants with evaluable data; participants with missing or indeterminate data set to Failure.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOITEnd of Intravenous Treatment (Up to Day 42)MITT population. N=number of participants with evaluable data; participants with missing data set to Failure.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOTEnd of Treatment (Up to Day 42)MITT population. N=number of participants with evaluable data; participants with missing data set to Failure.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Follow-UpPost treatment follow-up visit (Up to Day 52)MITT population. N=number of participants with evaluable data; participants with missing data set to Failure.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOITEnd of Intravenous Treatment (Up to Day 42)MITT population. N=number of participants with evaluable data; participants with missing or indeterminate data are set Failure.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOTEnd of Treatment (Up to Day 42)MITT population. N=number of participants with evaluable data; participants with missing or indeterminate data are set to Failure.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at Follow-UpPost treatment follow-up visit (Up to Day 52)MITT population. N=number of participants with evaluable data; participants with missing or indeterminate data are set to Failure.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who DiedBaseline to Day 52Safety population: All participants who have received at least one dose of study medication.participantsNUMBER

Results by group34

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIT)AnidulafunginSuccess62.5095% Confidence Interval 29.0 to 96.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIT)FluconazoleSuccess71.4395% Confidence Interval 38.0 to 100.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIT)AnidulafunginFailure37.5095% Confidence Interval 4.0 to 71.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIT)FluconazoleFailure28.5795% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 62.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)AnidulafunginSuccess62.5095% Confidence Interval 29.0 to 96.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)FluconazoleSuccess42.8695% Confidence Interval 6.2 to 79.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)AnidulafunginFailure37.5095% Confidence Interval 4.0 to 71.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)FluconazoleFailure57.1495% Confidence Interval 20.5 to 93.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOITAnidulafunginSuccess75.0095% Confidence Interval 45.0 to 100.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOITFluconazoleSuccess71.4395% Confidence Interval 38.0 to 100.0percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAnidulafungin9
Overall StudySTARTEDFluconazole8
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAnidulafungin5
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFluconazole5
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAnidulafungin4
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDFluconazole3

Adverse events52

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherSupraventricular tachycardiaCardiac disordersAnidulafungin19
otherSupraventricular tachycardiaCardiac disordersFluconazole08
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersAnidulafungin09
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersFluconazole28
otherIntestinal obsturctionGastrointestinal disordersAnidulafungin19
otherIntestinal obsturctionGastrointestinal disordersFluconazole08
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersAnidulafungin09
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersFluconazole18
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersAnidulafungin19
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersFluconazole28

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAnidulafungin
Total, all-cause mortalityFluconazole
Total, other adverse eventsAnidulafungin69
Total, other adverse eventsFluconazole68
Total, serious adverse eventsAnidulafungin29
Total, serious adverse eventsFluconazole08

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Anidulafungin vs Fluconazole: Number of Participants Who DiedTrial comparisons
Anidulafungin vs Fluconazole: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01176058

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01176058/results?page=2