ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01178086

A Study on Rituximab (MabThera) in Participants With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

NCT01178086, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2018-10-05

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study on Rituximab (MabThera) in Participants With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL). Trials, record NCT01178086. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01178086

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study on Rituximab (MabThera) in Participants With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
NCT number
NCT01178086
Status
Completed
Enrollment
681 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic
Interventions
Rituximab
First posted
2010-08-09
Last updated
2018-10-05
Results first posted
2018-10-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed Using Kaplan-Meier EstimateFrom initiation of treatment up to disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (assessed up to 24 months)
PFS was defined as the time from initiation of treatment with rituximab in combination with chemotherapy to disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was defined as the occurrence of at least one of the following: greater than or equal to (\>/=) 50 percent (%) increase in the longest diameter of at least two enlarged lymph nodes, increase in spleen and/or liver size by at least 2 centimeters (cm) from Baseline as determined by measurement below the costal margin, or \>/=50% increase in the number of circulating lymphocytes. Participants without disease progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at the last date of tumor evaluation in terms of PFS.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Without Progression or DeathFrom initiation of treatment up to disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (assessed up to 24 months)
Disease progression was defined as the occurrence of at least one of the following: \>/=50% increase in the longest diameter of at least two enlarged lymph nodes, increase in spleen and/or liver size by at least 2 cm from Baseline as determined by measurement below the costal margin, or \>/=50% increase in the number of circulating lymphocytes.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Progression and DeathFrom initiation of treatment up to disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (assessed up to 24 months)
Percentage of participants with an event (progression or death) was reported. Disease progression was defined as the occurrence of at least one of the following: \>/=50% increase in the longest diameter of at least two enlarged lymph nodes, increase in spleen and/or liver size by at least 2 cm from Baseline as determined by measurement below the costal margin, or \>/=50% increase in the number of circulating lymphocytes.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Received Each Treatment During the Course of StudyBaseline, Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, last Cycle (Cycle 18) (each cycle=1 month)
The chemotherapeutic regimen administereted during the course of study were: Rituximab-Bendamustine (R-Benda), Rituximab-Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide (R-FC), Rituximab-Clorambucil (R-Clb), R-Other and Rituximab mono.
SecondaryMean Body WeightBaseline, last cycle (Cycle 18) (each cycle=1 month), last visit (follow-up) (24 months)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline, last cycle (Cycle 18) (each cycle=1 month), last visit (follow-up) (24 months)
ECOG performance status was measured on a 4 point scale to assess participant's performance status. 0=Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=Restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory and able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=Ambulatory (\>50% of waking hours), capable of all self-care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed/chair \>50% of waking hours.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Status IndexBaseline, last cycle (Cycle 18) (each cycle=1 month), last visit (follow-up) (24 months)
Performance status was reflected by the Karnofsky index. Karnofsky performance status index ranges from 0-100% with higher scores indicating better functional status. An index between 90% and 100% corresponds to ECOG grade 0, index between 70% and 80% corresponds to ECOG grade 1, index between 50% and 60% corresponds to ECOG grade 2, index 40% corresponds to ECOG grade 3. ECOG grade 0=Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; grade 1=Restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory and able to carry out light or sedentary work; grade 2=Ambulatory (\>50% of waking hours), capable of all self-care, unable to carry out any work activities; grade 3=Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed/chair \>50% of waking hours.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With General SymptomsBaseline, last cycle (Cycle 18) (each cycle=1 month), last visit (follow-up) (24 months)General symptoms included fatigue, reduced performance, frequent infections, abdominal pain and exhaustion.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With B-SymptomsBaseline, last cycle (Cycle 18) (each cycle=1 month), last visit (follow-up) (24 months)B-symptoms included fever, night sweats, weight loss.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)From initiation of treatment up to disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (assessed up to 24 months)
Response to treatment was assessed as per clinical routine. BOR included complete response(CR or CR with incomplete hematopoietic regeneration),partial response(PR or nodular PR),stable disease(SD),progressive disease(PD). CR:hemoglobin\>/=11 grams/deciliter(g/dL), lymphocytes\<4000 cells/cubic millimeter(cells/mm\^3), neutrophils\>5000 cells/mm\^3,platelets\>100,000 cells/mm\^3,bone marrow biopsy with \<30% lymphocytes with no lymphocytic infiltrates, no evidence of lymphoid nodules on physical exam, performance status of 0. PR:\>50% decrease in size of enlarged lymph nodes, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, with peripheral counts meeting same criteria as CR or \>/=50% improvement from pre-treatment values.PD:occurrence of at least one of following: \>/=50% increase in longest diameter of at least 2 enlarged lymph nodes, increase in spleen and liver size by at least 2 cm from Baseline, or \>/=50% increase in number of circulating lymphocytes. Participants without CR/PR or PD were considered having SD.

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed Using Kaplan-Meier EstimateFrom initiation of treatment up to disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (assessed up to 24 months)Analysis was performed on EAS.monthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Without Progression or DeathFrom initiation of treatment up to disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (assessed up to 24 months)Analysis was performed on EAS.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Progression and DeathFrom initiation of treatment up to disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (assessed up to 24 months)Analysis was performed on EAS with events.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Received Each Treatment During the Course of StudyBaseline, Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, last Cycle (Cycle 18) (each cycle=1 month)Analysis was performed on EAS.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Body WeightBaseline, last cycle (Cycle 18) (each cycle=1 month), last visit (follow-up) (24 months)Analysis was performed on EAS. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants analyzed for this outcome. Here, number analyzed=participants evaluable at specified time-point.kilograms (kg)MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline, last cycle (Cycle 18) (each cycle=1 month), last visit (follow-up) (24 months)Analysis was performed on EAS. Here, number analyzed=participants evaluable at specified time-point.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Status IndexBaseline, last cycle (Cycle 18) (each cycle=1 month), last visit (follow-up) (24 months)Analysis was performed on EAS. Here, number analyzed=participants evaluable at specified time-point.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With General SymptomsBaseline, last cycle (Cycle 18) (each cycle=1 month), last visit (follow-up) (24 months)Analysis was performed on EAS. Here, number analyzed=participants evaluable at specified time-point.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With B-SymptomsBaseline, last cycle (Cycle 18) (each cycle=1 month), last visit (follow-up) (24 months)Analysis was performed on EAS. Here, number analyzed=participants evaluable at specified time-point.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)From initiation of treatment up to disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (assessed up to 24 months)Analysis was performed on EAS.percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group252

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed Using Kaplan-Meier EstimateUnselected Population (Participants With Any Comorbidity)50.695% Confidence Interval 42.4 to 59.6months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed Using Kaplan-Meier EstimateSlow Go Subpopulation33.795% Confidence Interval 26.2 to NAmonths
Percentage of Participants Without Progression or DeathUnselected Population (Participants With Any Comorbidity)71.195% Confidence Interval 66.1 to 75.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Without Progression or DeathSlow Go Subpopulation62.795% Confidence Interval 53.9 to 70.3percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Progression and DeathUnselected Population (Participants With Any Comorbidity)Progression68.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Progression and DeathSlow Go SubpopulationProgression66.7percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Progression and DeathUnselected Population (Participants With Any Comorbidity)Death31.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Progression and DeathSlow Go SubpopulationDeath33.3percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Received Each Treatment During the Course of StudyUnselected Population (Participants With Any Comorbidity)R-Benda at Baseline58.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Received Each Treatment During the Course of StudySlow Go SubpopulationR-Benda at Baseline64.0percentage of participants

Participant flow4

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDParticipants With Chonic Lymphatic Leukemia (CLL)681
Overall StudyEffectiveness Analysis Set (EAS)Participants With Chonic Lymphatic Leukemia (CLL)661
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDParticipants With Chonic Lymphatic Leukemia (CLL)349
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDParticipants With Chonic Lymphatic Leukemia (CLL)332

Adverse events244

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersUnselected Population (Participants With Any Comorbidity)40485
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSlow Go Subpopulation21196
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersUnselected Population (Participants With Any Comorbidity)129485
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSlow Go Subpopulation48196
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersUnselected Population (Participants With Any Comorbidity)33485
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSlow Go Subpopulation15196
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersUnselected Population (Participants With Any Comorbidity)99485
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSlow Go Subpopulation31196
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersUnselected Population (Participants With Any Comorbidity)26485
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersSlow Go Subpopulation14196

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityUnselected Population (Participants With Any Comorbidity)
Total, all-cause mortalitySlow Go Subpopulation
Total, other adverse eventsUnselected Population (Participants With Any Comorbidity)259485
Total, other adverse eventsSlow Go Subpopulation98196
Total, serious adverse eventsUnselected Population (Participants With Any Comorbidity)85485
Total, serious adverse eventsSlow Go Subpopulation44196

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
29393986DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Unselected Population (Participants With Any Comorbidity) vs Slow Go Subpopulation: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01178086

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01178086/results?page=2