ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01182337

A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Effectiveness of Single Administration Intradiscal rhGDF-5 for the Treatment of Early Stage Lumbar Disc Degeneration

NCT01182337, Phase 1, Phase 2, Completed, DePuy Spine; results first posted 2016-01-27

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Effectiveness of Single Administration Intradiscal rhGDF-5 for the Treatment of Early Stage Lumbar Disc Degeneration. Trials, record NCT01182337. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01182337

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Effectiveness of Single Administration Intradiscal rhGDF-5 for the Treatment of Early Stage Lumbar Disc Degeneration
NCT number
NCT01182337
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1, Phase 2
Enrollment
31 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
DePuy Spine
Conditions
Early Lumbar Disc Degeneration
Interventions
Intradiscal rhGDF-5, Vehicle control
First posted
2010-08-16
Last updated
2016-02-26
Results first posted
2016-01-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNeurological Assessment for Motor Function and Reflexes/Sensory12 months
Neurological Assessment for Motor Function and Reflexes/Sensory- Number of patients with Clinically Significant Abnormal results at 12 months. For Motor Function, Clinically Significant Abnormal results are determined by the surgeon investigator and are further classified by grade: 0= No Movement, 1= Flicker/trace of contraction, 2=Active movement when gravity removed, 3= Active movement against gravity, 4= Active Movement against gravity and resistance. For Reflexes/Sensory, Clinically Significant Abnormal results are determined by the surgeon investigator and are based on exams of the Knee, Ankle, L3-L5 Dermatone, and S1 Dermatome. Tension signs are evaluated with a straight leg raise to determine at which point, if any, sciatic pain occurs.
PrimaryTreatment Emergent Adverse Events- Relationship to Study DrugThrough a 12 month period and annual telephone contact at 24 and 36 months for subject health status follow-upNumber of patients with Treatment Emergent Adverse Events that were designated as Definitely Related to Study Drug.
PrimaryTreatment Emergent Adverse Events- Relationship to Study Drug12 month period and annual telephone contact at 24 and 36 months for subject health status follow-upNumber of patients with Treatment Emergent Adverse Events that were designated as Possibly or Probably Related to Study Drug.
SecondaryChange in Function Assessed by Oswestry Disability Index Change at 12 Months From Baseline.12 month
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a 10-category (Pain Intensity, Personal Care, Lifting, Walking, Sitting, Standing, Sleeping, Sex Life, Social Life, Traveling) disability measurement scale with a graded response from 0 to 5, with 0 being the best score (no impairment) to 5 being the worst score (significant impairment). ODI score for a subject is calculated by adding the scores and converting the score to a 100 point scale.
SecondaryChange in Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 12 Months From Baseline.12 months
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score asks the subject to place a vertical mark on a horizontal line (that is approximately 10 cm long) with 'No Pain' (score of 0 = 0 cm) listed on the left and 'Very severe pain' (score of 10=10cm) labeled on the right. The subject is instructed to indicate the amount of pain they feel in their back.
SecondaryChange in Physical Component Summary of Quality of Life Measure Assessed by Short Form 36 at 12 Months From Baseline12 months
The 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a patient reported outcome survey that evaluates functional health and well-being. The survey is converted into two summary measures (the Physical Component - PCS and Mental Component- MCS) that are scored from 0 to 100 (where 100 indicates the highest level of health).
SecondaryChange in Mental Component Summary Quality of Life Measure Assessed by Short Form SF-36 at 12 Months From Baseline.12 Months
The 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a patient reported outcome survey that evaluates functional health and well-being. The survey is converted into two summary measures (the Physical Component - PCS and Mental Component- MCS) that are scored from 0 to 100 (where 100 indicates the highest level of health).

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNeurological Assessment for Motor Function and Reflexes/Sensory12 months
Safety Population~For the Neurological Assessment at 12 months, only 21 subjects from the rhGDF-5 group completed the assessment (out of 22 total subjects) and 5 subjects from the Control group completed the assessment (out of 9 subjects total).
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Function Assessed by Oswestry Disability Index Change at 12 Months From Baseline.12 monthFAS Populationunits on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYTreatment Emergent Adverse Events- Relationship to Study DrugThrough a 12 month period and annual telephone contact at 24 and 36 months for subject health status follow-upSafety PopulationparticipantsNUMBER
PRIMARYTreatment Emergent Adverse Events- Relationship to Study Drug12 month period and annual telephone contact at 24 and 36 months for subject health status follow-upSafety PopulationparticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 12 Months From Baseline.12 monthsFAS Populationunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Physical Component Summary of Quality of Life Measure Assessed by Short Form 36 at 12 Months From Baseline12 monthsFAS Population~Only 21 subjects from the rhGDF-5 group (out of 22 total subjects) completed the baseline PCS, SF-36.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Mental Component Summary Quality of Life Measure Assessed by Short Form SF-36 at 12 Months From Baseline.12 MonthsFAS Population~Only 21 subjects from the rhGDF-5 group (out of 22 subjects total) completed the MCS, SF-36.units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group14

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Neurological Assessment for Motor Function and Reflexes/SensoryIntradiscal rhGDF-5 1.0mg0participants
Neurological Assessment for Motor Function and Reflexes/SensoryVehicle Control0participants
Change in Function Assessed by Oswestry Disability Index Change at 12 Months From Baseline.Intradiscal rhGDF-5 1.0mg-13.5Standard Deviation 13.86units on a scale
Change in Function Assessed by Oswestry Disability Index Change at 12 Months From Baseline.Vehicle Control-10.4Standard Deviation 8.98units on a scale
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events- Relationship to Study DrugIntradiscal rhGDF-5 1.0mg0participants
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events- Relationship to Study DrugVehicle Control0participants
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events- Relationship to Study DrugIntradiscal rhGDF-50participants
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events- Relationship to Study DrugVehicle Control1participants
Change in Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 12 Months From Baseline.Intradiscal rhGDF-5 1.0mg-2.49Standard Deviation 2.211units on a scale
Change in Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 12 Months From Baseline.Vehicle Control-1.42Standard Deviation 3.177units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDIntradiscal rhGDF-5 1.0mg22
Overall StudySTARTEDVehicle Control9
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIntradiscal rhGDF-5 1.0mg19
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVehicle Control7
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDIntradiscal rhGDF-5 1.0mg3
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVehicle Control2

Adverse events62

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherBack PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersIntradiscal rhGDF-58229
otherBack PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersVehicle Control394
otherMusculoskeletal PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersIntradiscal rhGDF-54225
otherMusculoskeletal PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersVehicle Control090
otherPain in ExtremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersIntradiscal rhGDF-53223
otherPain in ExtremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersVehicle Control191
otherIntervertebral Disc ProtrusionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersIntradiscal rhGDF-52222
otherIntervertebral Disc ProtrusionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersVehicle Control090
otherAbdominal Pain UpperGastrointestinal disordersIntradiscal rhGDF-51221
otherAbdominal Pain UpperGastrointestinal disordersVehicle Control191

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityIntradiscal rhGDF-5
Total, all-cause mortalityVehicle Control
Total, other adverse eventsIntradiscal rhGDF-51622
Total, other adverse eventsVehicle Control59
Total, serious adverse eventsIntradiscal rhGDF-5522
Total, serious adverse eventsVehicle Control29

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
33945627DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Intradiscal rhGDF-5 vs Vehicle Control: Treatment Emergent Adverse Events- Relationship to Study DrugTrial comparisons
Intradiscal rhGDF-5 1.0mg vs Vehicle Control: Neurological Assessment for Motor Function and Reflexes/SensoryTrial comparisons
Intradiscal rhGDF-5 1.0mg vs Vehicle Control: Treatment Emergent Adverse Events- Relationship to Study DrugTrial comparisons
Intradiscal rhGDF-5 vs Vehicle Control: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01182337

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01182337/events?page=2