Trial ยท NCT01194219
Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Apremilast (CC-10004) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
NCT01194219, Phase 3, Completed, Amgen; results first posted 2014-11-05
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Apremilast (CC-10004) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis. Trials, record NCT01194219. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01194219
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Apremilast (CC-10004) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
- NCT number
- NCT01194219
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 3
- Enrollment
- 844 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Conditions
- Plaque Psoriasis
- Interventions
- Apremilast, Placebo, Topical treatments or phototherapy
- First posted
- 2010-09-02
- Last updated
- 2022-03-15
- Results first posted
- 2014-11-05
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes14
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 16 From Baseline | Baseline to Week 16 | PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement is missing. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With At Least 2 Points Reduction From Baseline | Baseline to Week 16 | The sPGA was a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), incorporating an assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the disease: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation. When making the assessment of overall severity, the Investigator factored in areas that have already been cleared (ie, have scores of 0) and did not just evaluate remaining lesions for severity, ie, the severity of each sign was averaged across all areas of involvement, including cleared lesions. In the event of different severities across disease signs, the sign that is the predominant feature of the disease should be used to help determine the sPGA score. |
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Percent of Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16 | Baseline and Week 16 | BSA was a measurement of involved skin. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated based on the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or "handprint" including the fingers), which equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area. BSA percent change from baseline (Visit 2 Week 0) was determined at each visit of the study, which is calculated as 100\*(visit BSA - baseline BSA) / baseline BSA (%). |
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 16 | Baseline to Week 16 | Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) is multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. These values for each anatomic region are summed to yield the PASI score. The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement is missing. PASI score percent change from baseline was calculated as 100\* (visit score - baseline score)/baseline score (%). |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score (PASI-50) at Week 16 From Baseline | Baseline to Week 16 | A participant was classified as having at least a 50% improvement in PASI score from baseline, which was equivalent to a percent change from baseline ranging from -100% to -50%. PASI score is based on an assessment of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling), and the percent area affected as observed on the day of examination. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 16 | Baseline and Week 16 | The Pruritus Visual Analog Scores (VAS) were used to measure the amount of itching and discomfort a participant experiences. Participant's Assessment of Pruritus (Itch) asked: On average, how much itch have you had because of your condition in the past week? All VAS values range from 0 to 100. Higher scores correspond to more severe symptom or disease. Change from baseline was calculated for the VAS scale, where change = visit value - baseline value. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16 | Baseline to Week 16 | DLQI is a simple, compact, and practical questionnaire for use in a dermatology clinical setting to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains ten items dealing with the participant's skin. With the exception of Item Number 7, the participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from "Very Much" (score 3) to "Not at All" or "Not relevant" (score 0). Item Number 7 is a multi-part item, the first part of which ascertains whether the participant's skin prevented them from working or studying (Yes or No, scores 3 or 0 respectively), and if "No," then the participant is asked how much of a problem the skin has been at work or study over the past week, with response alternatives being "A lot," "A little," or "Not at all" (scores 2, 1, or 0 respectively). The DLQI total score is derived by summing all item scores, which has a possible range of 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Mental Component Summary (MSC) Score of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item (SF-36) Health Survey Version 2.0 at Week 16 | Baseline to Week 16 | The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Both a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI and sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least 2 Points Reduction at Week 16 From Baseline | Baseline to Week 16 | PASI-75 response was the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. See Outcome Measure #1 for further description. sPGA is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), incorporating an assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the disease: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation. See OCM #2 for further description. |
| Secondary | Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Loss of PASI-75 Response (Loss of Effect) at Week 32 During the Re-Randomized Treatment Withdrawal Phase | Week 32 to Week 52 | Time to loss was the time between the re-randomization date and the date of the first assessment where loss of PASI-75 was observed (event); or the time between the re-randomization date and the date of the last PASI assessment in the Weeks 32-52 interval prior to addition of protocol-prohibited medication/therapy, or resumption of APR 30 BID, or discontinuation, or Week 52 if no loss (censored). |
1 to 10 of 14Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 14 registered outcomesOutcomes14
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 16 From Baseline | Baseline to Week 16 | The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized per protocol. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized APR 30 BID or placebo for the FAS. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used. | percentage of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With At Least 2 Points Reduction From Baseline | Baseline to Week 16 | The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized per protocol. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized APR 30 BID or placebo for the FAS. Last observation carried forward imputation was used. | percentage of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Percent Change From Baseline in Percent of Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16 | Baseline and Week 16 | The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized per protocol. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized APR 30 BID or placebo for the FAS. Participants with a baseline value and at least 1 postbaseline value were included. Last observation carried forward imputation was used. | percent change | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Percent Change From Baseline in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 16 | Baseline to Week 16 | The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized per protocol. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized APR 30 BID or placebo for the FAS. Last observation carried forward imputation was used. Participants with a baseline value and at least 1 postbaseline value are included . | percent change | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score (PASI-50) at Week 16 From Baseline | Baseline to Week 16 | The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized per protocol. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized APR 30 BID or placebo for the FAS. Last observation carried forward imputation was used. | Percentage of Participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 16 | Baseline and Week 16 | The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized per protocol. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized APR 30 BID or placebo for the FAS. Last observation carried forward imputation was used. Participants with a baseline value and at least 1 postbaseline value are included. | units on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16 | Baseline to Week 16 | The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized per protocol. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized APR 30 BID or placebo for the FAS. Last observation carried forward imputation was used. Participants with a baseline value and at least 1 postbaseline value are included | units on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in the Mental Component Summary (MSC) Score of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item (SF-36) Health Survey Version 2.0 at Week 16 | Baseline to Week 16 | The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized per protocol. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized APR 30 BID or placebo for the FAS. Last observation carried forward imputation was used. Participants with a baseline value and at least 1 postbaseline value are included. | units on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Both a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI and sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least 2 Points Reduction at Week 16 From Baseline | Baseline to Week 16 | The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized per protocol. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized APR 30 BID or placebo for the FAS. Last observation carried forward imputation was used. | percentage of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Loss of PASI-75 Response (Loss of Effect) at Week 32 During the Re-Randomized Treatment Withdrawal Phase | Week 32 to Week 52 | Analysis population consisted of participants who were re-randomized to placebo or apremilast 30mg BID at Week 32. | Weeks | MEDIAN |
1 to 10 of 14Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 14 outcomesResults by group53
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 16 From Baseline | Placebo/Apremilast | 33.1 | percentage of participants | ||
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 16 From Baseline | Placebo (PBO) | 5.3 | percentage of participants | ||
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With At Least 2 Points Reduction From Baseline | Apremilast | 21.7 | percentage of participants | ||
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With At Least 2 Points Reduction From Baseline | Placebo | 3.9 | percentage of participants | ||
| Percent Change From Baseline in Percent of Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16 | Apremilast | -47.77 | Standard Error 1.634 | percent change | |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Percent of Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16 | Placebo | -6.99 | Standard Error 2.317 | percent change | |
| Percent Change From Baseline in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 16 | Placebo/Apremilast | -52.1 | Standard Error 1.37 | percent change | |
| Percent Change From Baseline in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 16 | Placebo | -16.8 | Standard Error 1.94 | percent change | |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score (PASI-50) at Week 16 From Baseline | Placebo/Apremilast | 58.7 | Percentage of Participants | ||
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score (PASI-50) at Week 16 From Baseline | Placebo | 17.0 | Percentage of Participants |
1 to 10 of 53Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 53 results by groupParticipant flow160
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo-Controlled Phase Weeks 0-16 | STARTED | Apremilast | 562 | |
| Placebo-Controlled Phase Weeks 0-16 | STARTED | Placebo | 282 | |
| Placebo-Controlled Phase Weeks 0-16 | STARTED | Apremilast-Apremilast | 0 | |
| Placebo-Controlled Phase Weeks 0-16 | STARTED | Placebo-Apremilast | 0 | |
| Placebo-Controlled Phase Weeks 0-16 | STARTED | APR-APR-Re-randomized to PBO | 0 | |
| Placebo-Controlled Phase Weeks 0-16 | STARTED | APR-APR-Re-randomized to APR | 0 | |
| Placebo-Controlled Phase Weeks 0-16 | STARTED | APR-APR-APR + Optional Topicals/UVB | 0 | |
| Placebo-Controlled Phase Weeks 0-16 | STARTED | PBO-APR-APR + Optional Topicals/ UVB | 0 | |
| Placebo-Controlled Phase Weeks 0-16 | STARTED | Apremilast (Long-term Extension) | 0 | |
| Placebo-Controlled Phase Weeks 0-16 | STARTED | Placebo-Apremilast (Long-term Extension) | 0 |
1 to 10 of 160Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 160 participant flowAdverse events396
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Placebo (Placebo-Controlled Phase) Weeks 0-16 | 20 | 282 | |
| other | Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Apremilast (Placebo-Controlled Phase) Weeks 0-16 | 105 | 560 | |
| other | Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | APR-APR-PBO Randomized Withdrawal Phase Weeks 32-52 | 0 | 77 | |
| other | Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Apremilast (Apremilast Exposure Period) Weeks 0-260 | 163 | 804 | |
| other | Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Placebo (Placebo-Controlled Phase) Weeks 0-16 | 19 | 282 | |
| other | Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Apremilast (Placebo-Controlled Phase) Weeks 0-16 | 88 | 560 | |
| other | Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | APR-APR-PBO Randomized Withdrawal Phase Weeks 32-52 | 0 | 77 | |
| other | Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Apremilast (Apremilast Exposure Period) Weeks 0-260 | 130 | 804 | |
| other | Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | Placebo (Placebo-Controlled Phase) Weeks 0-16 | 6 | 282 | |
| other | Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | Apremilast (Placebo-Controlled Phase) Weeks 0-16 | 10 | 560 |
1 to 10 of 396Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 396 adverse eventsAdverse event totals12
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Placebo (Placebo-Controlled Phase) Weeks 0-16 | ||
| Total, all-cause mortality | Apremilast (Placebo-Controlled Phase) Weeks 0-16 | ||
| Total, all-cause mortality | APR-APR-PBO Randomized Withdrawal Phase Weeks 32-52 | ||
| Total, all-cause mortality | Apremilast (Apremilast Exposure Period) Weeks 0-260 | ||
| Total, other adverse events | Placebo (Placebo-Controlled Phase) Weeks 0-16 | 90 | 282 |
| Total, other adverse events | Apremilast (Placebo-Controlled Phase) Weeks 0-16 | 260 | 560 |
| Total, other adverse events | APR-APR-PBO Randomized Withdrawal Phase Weeks 32-52 | 10 | 77 |
| Total, other adverse events | Apremilast (Apremilast Exposure Period) Weeks 0-260 | 503 | 804 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Placebo (Placebo-Controlled Phase) Weeks 0-16 | 8 | 282 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Apremilast (Placebo-Controlled Phase) Weeks 0-16 | 12 | 560 |
1 to 10 of 12Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 12 adverse event totalsPapers2
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01194219
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01194219/results?page=2