ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01200589

Single Agent Ofatumumab Vs. Single Agent Rituximab in Indolent B-Cell Non Hodgkin Lymphoma Relapsed After Rituximab-Containing Therapy

NCT01200589, Phase 3, Terminated, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2018-05-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Single Agent Ofatumumab Vs. Single Agent Rituximab in Indolent B-Cell Non Hodgkin Lymphoma Relapsed After Rituximab-Containing Therapy. Trials, record NCT01200589. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01200589

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Single Agent Ofatumumab Vs. Single Agent Rituximab in Indolent B-Cell Non Hodgkin Lymphoma Relapsed After Rituximab-Containing Therapy
NCT number
NCT01200589
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
438 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Interventions
Ofatumumab, Rituximab, Ofatumumab, Rituximab
First posted
2010-09-13
Last updated
2018-05-16
Results first posted
2018-05-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-free Survival (PFS) - Number of Participants With PFS Events200 weeks
Disease response assessed by modified 2007 Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Nodal disease, PD: 1)prev. normal node (\<=1.5cm x \<=1.0cm) that incr. to \>2.0 x ≥1.5cm; 2)≥50% incr. from nadir product of perpendicular diameter (PPD) of any prev. involved node with long axis \>1.5cm at baseline (BL) (must incr. by ≥0.5mm \& to \>2.0cm) OR ≥50% incr. from nadir in long axis of any prev. inv. node with long axis of \>1.5cm at BL (long axis must incr. by ≥0.5mm \& to \>2.0cm); or 3)≥50% incr. from nadir in the sums of prod. of diameters (SPD) of target nodes \& ≥1 node with long axis \>1.5cm. Extranodal, PD 1)any new lesion \>2.0 x ≥1.5cm not attributed to non-lymphoma causes; 2)≥50% incr. from nadir PPD of any targ. les. \& \>5mm incr. in either axis \& les. must measure \>1.5cm x ≥1.5cm OR ≥50% incr. from nadir in long axis of any targ. les. \& \>5mm incr. in either axis \& les. must measure \>1.5cm x ≥1.5cm; or 3)≥50% incr. from nadir in SPD of targ. nodes \& ≥1 node with long axis \>1.5cm.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Complete Response (CR)200 weeks
Complete response was assessed according to modified 2007 Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (RRCML) and defined as follows: 1) complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease (all target nodes regressing to \<=1.5cm in the long axis and all non-target lesions being normal in size by imaging) and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; 2) the spleen/liver, if considered enlarged due to lymphoma based on CT scan prior to therapy, would be normal and nodules should disappear; and 3) if bone marrow was involved before treatment, the infiltrate must clear on repeat bone marrow biopsy. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the neck, thorax, abdomen and pelvis were performed as part of the efficacy evaluation.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Overall Response (OR)200 weeks
The overall response rate (ORR) was defined as the number of participants achieving a CR or partial response (PR). from start of randomization until disease progression, or the start of a new anti-cancer therapy. Disease response was assessed according to modified 2007 Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (RRCML). Computed tomography (CT) scans of the neck, thorax, abdomen and pelvis were performed as part of the efficacy evaluation. Bone marrow examination to confirm a suspected complete response (CR) was performed within 8 weeks following the onset of a CT scan confirmed CR.
SecondaryNumber of Deaths200 weeksThe number of deaths were assessed.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Infection Related Adverse Events200 weeksThe number of participants with infection related adverse events was assessed.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Infusion Related Adverse Events Due to Study Drug36 weeks + 60 daysThe number of participants with infusion related adverse events due to study drug was assessed.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Myelosuppression Adverse Events200 weeksThe number of participants with myelosuppression adverse events was assessed.
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR)200 weeks
SecondaryTime to Next Treatment200 weeks
SecondaryPharmacokinetics70 weeks

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-free Survival (PFS) - Number of Participants With PFS Events200 weeksThe Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, comprised of all randomized participants, was analyzed.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Complete Response (CR)200 weeksThe Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, comprised of all randomized participants, was analyzed.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Overall Response (OR)200 weeksThe Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, comprised of all randomized participants, was analyzed.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Deaths200 weeksThe Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, comprised of all randomized participants, was analyzed.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Infection Related Adverse Events200 weeksThe safety set, comprised of all participants who received one dose of study drug, was analyzed.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Infusion Related Adverse Events Due to Study Drug36 weeks + 60 daysThe safety set, comprised of all participants who received one dose of study drug, was analyzed.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Myelosuppression Adverse Events200 weeksThe safety set, comprised of all participants who received one dose of study drug, was analyzed.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of Response (DOR)200 weeksThe analysis of this outcome was not performed due to the early termination of the study. Please see the brief summary of the protocol section for additional details.
SECONDARYTime to Next Treatment200 weeksThe analysis of this outcome was not performed due to the early termination of the study. Please see the brief summary of the protocol section for additional details.
SECONDARYPharmacokinetics70 weeksThe analysis of this outcome was not performed due to the early termination of the study. Please see the brief summary of the protocol section for additional details.

Results by group14

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-free Survival (PFS) - Number of Participants With PFS EventsOfatumumab114Participants
Progression-free Survival (PFS) - Number of Participants With PFS EventsRituximab117Participants
Number of Participants With Complete Response (CR)Ofatumumab36Participants
Number of Participants With Complete Response (CR)Rituximab44Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR)Ofatumumab110Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR)Rituximab144Participants
Number of DeathsOfatumumab28Participants
Number of DeathsRituximab30Participants
Number of Participants With Infection Related Adverse EventsOfatumumab69Participants
Number of Participants With Infection Related Adverse EventsRituximab81Participants

Participant flow10

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDOfatumumab219
Overall StudySTARTEDRituximab219
Overall StudyIntent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis SetOfatumumab219
Overall StudyIntent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis SetRituximab219
Overall StudySafety SetOfatumumab217
Overall StudySafety SetRituximab218
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOfatumumab29
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRituximab30
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOfatumumab190
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRituximab189

Adverse events232

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersOfatumumab6217
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab16218
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersOfatumumab12217
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersRituximab7218
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersOfatumumab17217
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersRituximab11218
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersOfatumumab20217
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersRituximab15218
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersOfatumumab19217
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersRituximab16218

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityOfatumumab
Total, all-cause mortalityRituximab
Total, other adverse eventsOfatumumab177217
Total, other adverse eventsRituximab150218
Total, serious adverse eventsOfatumumab38217
Total, serious adverse eventsRituximab37218

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
32810220DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons8

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Ofatumumab vs Rituximab: Number of Participants With Complete Response (CR)Trial comparisons
Ofatumumab vs Rituximab: Number of Participants With Infusion Related Adverse Events Due to Study DrugTrial comparisons
Ofatumumab vs Rituximab: Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR)Trial comparisons
Ofatumumab vs Rituximab: Progression-free Survival (PFS) - Number of Participants With PFS EventsTrial comparisons
Ofatumumab vs Rituximab: Number of DeathsTrial comparisons
Ofatumumab vs Rituximab: Number of Participants With Myelosuppression Adverse EventsTrial comparisons
Ofatumumab vs Rituximab: Number of Participants With Infection Related Adverse EventsTrial comparisons
Ofatumumab vs Rituximab: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01200589

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01200589/events?page=2