ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01200758

A Study of Rituximab (MabThera) Subcutaneous (SC) Versus Rituximab (MabThera) Intravenous in Participannts With Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

NCT01200758, Phase 3, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2015-08-05

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Rituximab (MabThera) Subcutaneous (SC) Versus Rituximab (MabThera) Intravenous in Participannts With Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Trials, record NCT01200758. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01200758

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Rituximab (MabThera) Subcutaneous (SC) Versus Rituximab (MabThera) Intravenous in Participannts With Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
NCT number
NCT01200758
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
410 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Interventions
Rituximab SC, Rituximab IV, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Prednisone/Prednisolone
First posted
2010-09-14
Last updated
2018-11-27
Results first posted
2015-08-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes26

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryStage I: Trough Serum Concentrations (Ctrough) of IV and SC RituximabStage I: Cycle (Cy) 7 Day (D) 21 (within 2 hours predose on Cy8) of induction treatment (1 Cy=3 weeks)
PrimaryStage II: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)Stage II: Baseline up to end of induction treatment Cy8 (24 weeks) (1 Cy=3 weeks)
Overall Response comprised complete response (CR), CR unconfirmed (CRu), or PR. A participant was defined as a responder if they sustained a CR, CRu or PR at the end of induction treatment. Response assessment was based on clinical examination and computed tomography (CT) scans. Assessment of tumor response was performed according to the International Working Group response criteria for NHL. CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; CRu: CR along with regression in lymph node mass by more than (\>) 75% in the sum of the products of greatest diameters (SPD); PR: Greater than or equal to (≥) 50% decrease in SPD of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. The 95% CI was estimated for one sample binomial using Pearson-Clopper.
SecondaryStage I: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage I: Baseline up to end of induction treatment Cy8 (24 weeks) (1 Cy=3 weeks)
Overall Response comprised CR, CRu, or PR. A participant was defined as a responder if they sustained a CR, CRu or PR at the end of induction treatment. Response assessment was based on clinical examination and CT scans. Assessment of tumor response was performed according to the International Working Group response criteria for NHL. CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; CRu: CR along with regression in lymph node mass by \>75% in the SPD; PR: ≥50% decrease in SPD of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. The 95% CI was estimated for one sample binomial using Pearson-Clopper.
SecondaryStage I and II (Pooled): Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage I and II: Baseline up to end of induction treatment Cy8 (24 weeks) (1 Cy=3 weeks)
Overall Response comprised of CR, CRu, or PR. A participant was defined as a responder if they sustained a CR, CRu or PR at the end of induction treatment. Response assessment was based on clinical examination and CT scans. Assessment of tumour response was performed according to the International Working Group response criteria for NHL. CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; CRu: CR along with regression in lymph node mass by \>75% in SPD; PR: ≥50% decrease in SPD of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. The 95% CI for the response rates was estimated for one sample binomial using Pearson-Clopper.
SecondaryStage I: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage I: Baseline up to end of induction treatment Cy8 (24 weeks) (1 Cy=3 weeks)
Complete Response was comprised CR and CRu. A participant was defined as a responder if they sustained a CR or CRu at the end of induction treatment. Response assessment was based on clinical examination and CT scans. Assessment of tumor response was performed according to the International Working Group response criteria for NHL. CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; CRu: CR along with regression in lymph node mass by \>75% in SPD. The 95% CI for the response rates was estimated for one sample binomial using Pearson-Clopper.
SecondaryStage II: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage II: Baseline up to end of induction treatment Cy8 (24 weeks) (1 Cy=3 weeks)
Complete Response comprised of CR and CRu. A participant was defined as a responder if they sustained a CR or CRu at the end of induction treatment. Response assessment was based on clinical examination and CT scans. Assessment of tumor response was performed according to the International Working Group response criteria for NHL. CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; CRu: CR along with regression in lymph node mass by \>75% in SPD. The 95% CI for the response rates was estimated for one sample binomial using Pearson-Clopper.
SecondaryStage I and II (Pooled): Percentage of Participants With Complete Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage I and II: Baseline up to end of induction treatment Cy8 (24 weeks) (1 Cy=3 weeks)
Complete Response comprised of CR and CRu. A participant was defined as a responder if they sustained a CR or CRu at the end of induction treatment. Response assessment was based on clinical examination and CT scans. Assessment of tumor response was performed according to the International Working Group response criteria for NHL. CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; CRu: CR along with regression in lymph node mass by \>75% in SPD. The 95% CI for the response rates was estimated for one sample binomial using Pearson-Clopper.
SecondaryStage I and II (Pooled): Percentage of Participants With Complete Response at the End of Maintenance Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage I and II: Baseline up to 57 days after last maintenance dose (last maintenance dose: maintenance Cy12/Study Cy20 [30 months]) (up to data cutoff of 31 Oct 2017 [up to 6 years]) (1 Cy=8 weeks)
Complete Response comprised of CR and CRu. A participant was defined as a responder if they sustained a CR or CRu at the end of induction treatment. Response assessment was based on clinical examination and CT scans. Assessment of tumor response was performed according to the International Working Group response criteria for NHL. CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; CRu: CR along with regression in lymph node mass by \>75% in SPD. The 95% CI for the response rates was estimated for one sample binomial using Pearson-Clopper.
SecondaryStage I and II (Pooled): Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Maintenance Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage I and II: Baseline up to 57 days after last maintenance dose (last maintenance dose: maintenance Cy12/Study Cy20 [30 months]) (up to data cutoff of 31 Oct 2017 [up to 6 years]) (1 Cy=8 weeks)
Overall Response comprised of CR, CRu, or PR . A participant was defined as a responder if they sustained a CR, CRu or PR at the end of induction treatment. Response assessment was based on clinical examination and CT scans. Assessment of tumor response was performed according to the International Working Group response criteria for NHL. CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; CRu: CR along with regression in lymph node mass by \>75% in SPD. The 95% CI for the response rates was estimated for one sample binomial using Pearson-Clopper.
SecondaryStage I and II (Pooled): Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression/Relapse or DeathBaseline up to disease progression or death up to data cutoff of 31 Oct 2017 (up to 6 years) (See detailed timeframe in Outcome Measure description)
Disease progression: ≥50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node or appearance of any new lesion during or at the end of therapy or ≥50% increase in the greatest diameter of any previously identified node \>1 cm in its short axis or in the SPD of more than one node. Baseline, D1 of all cycles (Cy 1-20) (1 Cy=3 weeks for Cy1-8 \& 8 weeks for Cy9-20), at early withdrawal, at follow-up, every 12 weeks for 96 weeks or until documented disease progression/relapse or death (up to median of 27 months; up to data cutoff of 31 Oct 2017 \[up to 6 years\])

Outcomes26

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYStage I: Trough Serum Concentrations (Ctrough) of IV and SC RituximabStage I: Cycle (Cy) 7 Day (D) 21 (within 2 hours predose on Cy8) of induction treatment (1 Cy=3 weeks)
Stage I pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluable population comprised all participants with data for Ctrough available at Cycle 7 and/or observed area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) available at Cycle 7. Participants were analyzed as per treatment received. Number of participants analyzed = participants analyzed for this outcome measure.
micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)GEOMETRIC_MEAN
PRIMARYStage II: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)Stage II: Baseline up to end of induction treatment Cy8 (24 weeks) (1 Cy=3 weeks)Stage II ITT Population included all participants who were randomized in Stage II irrespective whether they received study drug or not.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYStage I: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage I: Baseline up to end of induction treatment Cy8 (24 weeks) (1 Cy=3 weeks)Stage I ITT Population included all participants who were randomized in Stage I irrespective whether they received study drug or not.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYStage I and II (Pooled): Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage I and II: Baseline up to end of induction treatment Cy8 (24 weeks) (1 Cy=3 weeks)ITT Population.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYStage I: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage I: Baseline up to end of induction treatment Cy8 (24 weeks) (1 Cy=3 weeks)Stage I ITT Population.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYStage II: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage II: Baseline up to end of induction treatment Cy8 (24 weeks) (1 Cy=3 weeks)Stage II ITT Population.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYStage I and II (Pooled): Percentage of Participants With Complete Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage I and II: Baseline up to end of induction treatment Cy8 (24 weeks) (1 Cy=3 weeks)ITT Population.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYStage I and II (Pooled): Percentage of Participants With Complete Response at the End of Maintenance Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage I and II: Baseline up to 57 days after last maintenance dose (last maintenance dose: maintenance Cy12/Study Cy20 [30 months]) (up to data cutoff of 31 Oct 2017 [up to 6 years]) (1 Cy=8 weeks)ITT population; only participants who entered the maintenance phase and received at least 1 cycle of rituximab maintenance treatment from Cycle 9 to Cycle 20 were included in the analysis.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYStage I and II (Pooled): Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Maintenance Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage I and II: Baseline up to 57 days after last maintenance dose (last maintenance dose: maintenance Cy12/Study Cy20 [30 months]) (up to data cutoff of 31 Oct 2017 [up to 6 years]) (1 Cy=8 weeks)ITT population; only participants who entered the maintenance phase and received at least 1 cycle of rituximab maintenance treatment from Cycle 9 to Cycle 20 were included in the analysis.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYStage I and II (Pooled): Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression/Relapse or DeathBaseline up to disease progression or death up to data cutoff of 31 Oct 2017 (up to 6 years) (See detailed timeframe in Outcome Measure description)ITT Population.percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group158

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Stage I: Trough Serum Concentrations (Ctrough) of IV and SC RituximabStage I: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)83.1Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.7micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Stage I: Trough Serum Concentrations (Ctrough) of IV and SC RituximabStage I: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)134.6Geometric Coefficient of Variation 43.2micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Stage II: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)Stage II: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)85.195% Confidence Interval 78.1 to 90.5percentage of participants
Stage II: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)Stage II: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)80.395% Confidence Interval 72.8 to 86.5percentage of participants
Stage I: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage I: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)82.895% Confidence Interval 71.3 to 91.1percentage of participants
Stage I: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage I: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)90.595% Confidence Interval 80.4 to 96.4percentage of participants
Stage I and II (Pooled): Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage I and II: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)84.995% Confidence Interval 79.2 to 89.5percentage of participants
Stage I and II (Pooled): Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage I and II: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)84.495% Confidence Interval 78.7 to 89.1percentage of participants
Stage I: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage I: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)25.095% Confidence Interval 15.0 to 37.4percentage of participants
Stage I: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response at the End of Induction Treatment Assessed Using International Working Group Response Criteria for NHLStage I: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)42.995% Confidence Interval 30.5 to 56.0percentage of participants

Participant flow24

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Stage ISTARTEDStage I: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)64
Stage ISTARTEDStage I: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)63
Stage ISTARTEDStage II: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)0
Stage ISTARTEDStage II: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)0
Stage ICOMPLETEDStage I: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)46
Stage ICOMPLETEDStage I: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)46
Stage ICOMPLETEDStage II: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)0
Stage ICOMPLETEDStage II: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)0
Stage INOT COMPLETEDStage I: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)18
Stage INOT COMPLETEDStage I: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)17

Adverse events390

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersStage I and II: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)47210
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersStage I and II: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)65197
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersStage I and II: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)55210
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersStage I and II: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)50197
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersStage I and II: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)35210
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersStage I and II: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)34197
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersStage I and II: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)27210
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersStage I and II: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)29197
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersStage I and II: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)25210
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersStage I and II: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)29197

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityStage I and II: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)
Total, all-cause mortalityStage I and II: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)
Total, other adverse eventsStage I and II: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)187210
Total, other adverse eventsStage I and II: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)186197
Total, serious adverse eventsStage I and II: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)76210
Total, serious adverse eventsStage I and II: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP)74197

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
24002601DERIVEDPubMed
24265828DERIVEDPubMed
24521993DERIVEDPubMed
28476440DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Stage I and II: Rituximab IV + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP) vs Stage I and II: Rituximab SC + Chemotherapy (CHOP/CVP): serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01200758

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01200758/registered?page=2