ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01201317

A Study to Investigate the Analgesic Efficacy of AZD2423 Compared With Placebo After 28 Days Treatment in Patients With Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy

NCT01201317, Phase 2, Completed, AstraZeneca; results first posted 2013-09-25

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Investigate the Analgesic Efficacy of AZD2423 Compared With Placebo After 28 Days Treatment in Patients With Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy. Trials, record NCT01201317. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01201317

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Investigate the Analgesic Efficacy of AZD2423 Compared With Placebo After 28 Days Treatment in Patients With Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy
NCT number
NCT01201317
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
134 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Conditions
Neuropathic Pain
Interventions
AZD2423, AZD2423, Placebo
First posted
2010-09-14
Last updated
2014-04-25
Results first posted
2013-09-25

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Days 24-28 in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Average Pain Score.Baseline (mean of Day -5 to Day -1) to the mean of Day 24 to Day 28
Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). Twice daily, the participants rated their Average Pain intensity during the past 12 hours on an Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10; 0=No pain, 10=Worst pain imaginable.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Days 24-28 in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Worst Pain Score.Baseline (mean of Day -5 to Day -1) to the mean of Day 24 to Day 28
Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). Twice daily, the participants rated their Worst pain intensity during the past 12 hours on an Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10, 0=No pain, 10=Worst pain imaginable.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With at Least 30% Decrease From Baseline in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Average Pain Score at Day 28.Baseline (mean of Day -5 to Day -1) to Day 28
Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) Average Pain score reduction=(change from baseline at Day 28/baseline)\*100. Responder= NRS Average Pain score reduction ≥30% (yes/no)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With at Least 50% Decrease From Baseline in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Average Pain Score at Day 28.Baseline (mean of Day -5 to Day -1) to Day 28
Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Average Pain score reduction=(change from baseline at Day 28/baseline)\*100. Responder= NRS Average Pain score reduction ≥50% (yes/no)
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Day 29 in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory Scale (NPSI) Total Score.Baseline (Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 7)
Last Observation carried Forward (LOCF). Scale consists of 10 Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory Scale (NPSI) pain symptom descriptors wiht a recall period of 24 hours. Each descriptor is rated on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10; 0=No (symptom), 10=Worst (symptom) imaginable. The NPSI Total Score was calculated as the sum of 10 of the NPSI descriptors. Range for total score 0 -100. Higher total score implicates worse symptoms.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Days 24-28 in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Average Pain Score.Baseline (mean of Day -5 to Day -1) to the mean of Day 24 to Day 28Intention-to-treat set (ITT)Scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Days 24-28 in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Worst Pain Score.Baseline (mean of Day -5 to Day -1) to the mean of Day 24 to Day 28Intention-to-treat set (ITT)Scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With at Least 30% Decrease From Baseline in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Average Pain Score at Day 28.Baseline (mean of Day -5 to Day -1) to Day 28Intention-to-treat set (ITT)ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With at Least 50% Decrease From Baseline in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Average Pain Score at Day 28.Baseline (mean of Day -5 to Day -1) to Day 28Intention-to-treat set (ITT)ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Day 29 in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory Scale (NPSI) Total Score.Baseline (Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 7)Modified Intention- to- treat set (ITT) including only patients with adequate baseline and Day 29 dataScores on a scaleMEAN

Results by group15

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline to Days 24-28 in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Average Pain Score.AZD2423 150 mg-1.35Standard Deviation 1.89Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to Days 24-28 in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Average Pain Score.AZD2423 20 mg-1.50Standard Deviation 1.77Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to Days 24-28 in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Average Pain Score.Placebo-1.61Standard Deviation 2.26Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to Days 24-28 in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Worst Pain Score.AZD2423 150 mg-1.57Standard Deviation 1.96Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to Days 24-28 in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Worst Pain Score.AZD2423 20 mg-1.66Standard Deviation 2.06Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to Days 24-28 in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Worst Pain Score.Placebo-1.80Standard Deviation 2.48Scores on a scale
Number of Participants With at Least 30% Decrease From Baseline in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Average Pain Score at Day 28.AZD2423 150 mg16Participants
Number of Participants With at Least 30% Decrease From Baseline in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Average Pain Score at Day 28.AZD2423 20 mg19Participants
Number of Participants With at Least 30% Decrease From Baseline in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Average Pain Score at Day 28.Placebo15Participants
Number of Participants With at Least 50% Decrease From Baseline in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Average Pain Score at Day 28.AZD2423 150 mg10Participants

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAZD2423 150 mg48
Overall StudySTARTEDAZD2423 20 mg45
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo41
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAZD2423 150 mg39
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAZD2423 20 mg38
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo33
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAZD2423 150 mg9
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAZD2423 20 mg7
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo8

Adverse events39

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersAZD2423 150 mg347
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersAZD2423 20 mg044
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo141
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersAZD2423 150 mg247
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersAZD2423 20 mg144
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersPlacebo141
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersAZD2423 150 mg247
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersAZD2423 20 mg144
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo141
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersAZD2423 150 mg247

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAZD2423 150 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityAZD2423 20 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsAZD2423 150 mg1447
Total, other adverse eventsAZD2423 20 mg644
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1141
Total, serious adverse eventsAZD2423 150 mg047
Total, serious adverse eventsAZD2423 20 mg344
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo041

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01201317

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01201317/events?page=2