ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01213173

Evaluation of Succinate Metoprolol on Heart Rate in the Stable Angina Patients

NCT01213173, Phase 4, Completed, AstraZeneca; results first posted 2013-08-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Evaluation of Succinate Metoprolol on Heart Rate in the Stable Angina Patients. Trials, record NCT01213173. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01213173

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Evaluation of Succinate Metoprolol on Heart Rate in the Stable Angina Patients
NCT number
NCT01213173
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
251 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Conditions
Angina Pectoris
Interventions
Succinate Metoprolol (Betaloc ZOK®), Succinate Metoprolol (Betaloc ZOK®)
First posted
2010-10-01
Last updated
2014-09-05
Results first posted
2013-08-26
Limitations and caveats
The sample size was insufficient for the secondary endpoints. Besides, the treatment prior to study did not correlate well with 47.5 mg metoprolol succinate, but with some higher dose. last the quality control of the study needs further improvement.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryThe Impact on 24-hr Average Heart Rate Between Two Groups (Betaloc ZOK® 95mg vs. 190mg)After 8 weeks treatment in the studyDifference of the 24-hr average heart rate between two groups after 8 weeks treatment.
SecondaryThe Impact on 24-hr Average Heart Rate From Baseline Within GroupsAfter 8 weeks treatment in the studyDifference of the 24-hr average heart rate within groups from baseline after 8 weeks treatment.
SecondaryThe Different Impact on 24-hr Average Heart Rate Between Two GroupsAfter 2 weeks treatment in the studyDifference of the 24-hr average heart rate between two groups after 2 weeks of treatment.
SecondaryThe Different Impact on 24-hr Average Heart Rate From Baseline Within GroupsAfter 2 weeks treatment in the studyDifference of the 24-hr average heart rate within groups from baseline after 2 weeks treatment.
SecondaryThe Proportion of Patients With Resting Heart Rate Controlled to ≤60bpm Between GroupsAfter 2 weeks treatmentDifference in proportions of patients who had resting heart rate controlled to ≤60 bpm after 2 weeks treatment between groups
SecondaryThe Proportion of Patients With Resting Heart Rate Controlled to ≤60bpm Between GroupsAfter 8 weeks treatmentDifference in proportions of patients who had resting heart rate controlled to ≤60 bpm after 8 weeks treatment between groups
SecondaryThe Difference of Change From Baseline in Total Ischemic Burden Between GroupsAfter 2 weeks treatment
Difference in change from baseline in TIB between two groups after 2 weeks treatment. Total Ischemic Burden (TIB) was defined as the sum of product of each ischemia episode lasting time and maximal ST elevation: TIB=Σ(STmax×Tisc).
SecondaryThe Difference of Change From Baseline in Total Ischemic Burden Between GroupsAfter 8 weeks treatment
Difference in change from baseline in TIB between two groups after 8 weeks treatment. Total Ischemic Burden (TIB) was defined as the sum of product of each ischemia episode lasting time and maximal ST elevation: TIB=Σ(STmax×Tisc).
SecondaryThe Difference of Change From Baseline in Angina Frequency Between GroupsAfter 2 weeks treatmentDifference in change from baseline of angina pectoris frequency between two groups after 2 weeks treatment.
SecondaryThe Difference of Change From Baseline in Angina Frequency Between GroupsAfter 8 weeks treatmentDifference in change from baseline of angina pectoris frequency between two groups after 8 weeks treatment.

Outcomes13

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYThe Impact on 24-hr Average Heart Rate Between Two Groups (Betaloc ZOK® 95mg vs. 190mg)After 8 weeks treatment in the study
ITT population was defined as all randomized subjects who had taken at least one dose of trial treatment, who had measurements at baseline for one or more efficacy variables and at least one post baseline measurement for the same variables in the treatment period.
BpmMEAN
SECONDARYThe Impact on 24-hr Average Heart Rate From Baseline Within GroupsAfter 8 weeks treatment in the study
ITT population was defined as all randomized subjects who had taken at least one dose of trial treatment, who had measurements at baseline for one or more efficacy variables and at least one post baseline measurement for the same variables in the treatment period.
BpmLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYThe Different Impact on 24-hr Average Heart Rate Between Two GroupsAfter 2 weeks treatment in the study
ITT population was defined as all randomized subjects who had taken at least one dose of trial treatment, who had measurements at baseline for one or more efficacy variables and at least one post baseline measurement for the same variables in the treatment period.
BpmMEAN
SECONDARYThe Different Impact on 24-hr Average Heart Rate From Baseline Within GroupsAfter 2 weeks treatment in the study
ITT population was defined as all randomized subjects who had taken at least one dose of trial treatment, who had measurements at baseline for one or more efficacy variables and at least one post baseline measurement for the same variables in the treatment period.
BpmLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYThe Proportion of Patients With Resting Heart Rate Controlled to ≤60bpm Between GroupsAfter 2 weeks treatment
ITT population was defined as all randomized subjects who had taken at least one dose of trial treatment, who had measurements at baseline for one or more efficacy variables and at least one post baseline measurement for the same variables in the treatment period.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Proportion of Patients With Resting Heart Rate Controlled to ≤60bpm Between GroupsAfter 8 weeks treatment
ITT population was defined as all randomized subjects who had taken at least one dose of trial treatment, who had measurements at baseline for one or more efficacy variables and at least one post baseline measurement for the same variables in the treatment period.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Difference of Change From Baseline in Total Ischemic Burden Between GroupsAfter 2 weeks treatment
ITT population was defined as all randomized subjects who had taken at least one dose of trial treatment, who had measurements at baseline for one or more efficacy variables and at least one post baseline measurement for the same variables in the treatment period.
mm*minLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYThe Difference of Change From Baseline in Total Ischemic Burden Between GroupsAfter 8 weeks treatment
ITT population was defined as all randomized subjects who had taken at least one dose of trial treatment, who had measurements at baseline for one or more efficacy variables and at least one post baseline measurement for the same variables in the treatment period.
mm*minLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYThe Difference of Change From Baseline in Angina Frequency Between GroupsAfter 2 weeks treatment
ITT population was defined as all randomized subjects who had taken at least one dose of trial treatment, who had measurements at baseline for one or more efficacy variables and at least one post baseline measurement for the same variables in the treatment period.
Attacks per weekLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYThe Difference of Change From Baseline in Angina Frequency Between GroupsAfter 8 weeks treatment
ITT population was defined as all randomized subjects who had taken at least one dose of trial treatment, who had measurements at baseline for one or more efficacy variables and at least one post baseline measurement for the same variables in the treatment period.
Attacks per weekLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group28

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
The Impact on 24-hr Average Heart Rate Between Two Groups (Betaloc ZOK® 95mg vs. 190mg)Arm 1 - Active ComparatorBaseline71.4Standard Deviation 8.02Bpm
The Impact on 24-hr Average Heart Rate Between Two Groups (Betaloc ZOK® 95mg vs. 190mg)Arm 2 - ExperimentalBaseline70.9Standard Deviation 8.19Bpm
The Impact on 24-hr Average Heart Rate Between Two Groups (Betaloc ZOK® 95mg vs. 190mg)Arm 1 - Active ComparatorWeek 970.9Standard Deviation 8.71Bpm
The Impact on 24-hr Average Heart Rate Between Two Groups (Betaloc ZOK® 95mg vs. 190mg)Arm 2 - ExperimentalWeek 968.6Standard Deviation 8.40Bpm
The Impact on 24-hr Average Heart Rate From Baseline Within GroupsArm 1 - Active Comparator-0.624495% Confidence Interval 7.16Bpm
The Impact on 24-hr Average Heart Rate From Baseline Within GroupsArm 2 - Experimental-2.985895% Confidence Interval 6.62Bpm
The Different Impact on 24-hr Average Heart Rate Between Two GroupsArm 1 - Active Comparator70.6Standard Deviation 7.75Bpm
The Different Impact on 24-hr Average Heart Rate Between Two GroupsArm 2 - Experimental69.2Standard Deviation 7.82Bpm
The Different Impact on 24-hr Average Heart Rate From Baseline Within GroupsArm 1 - Active Comparator-0.493895% Confidence Interval 4.69Bpm
The Different Impact on 24-hr Average Heart Rate From Baseline Within GroupsArm 2 - Experimental-2.138395% Confidence Interval 5.71Bpm

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDActive Comparator125
Overall StudySTARTEDExperimental126
Overall StudyPatients Included in Safety PopulationActive Comparator139
Overall StudyPatients Included in Safety PopulationExperimental112
Overall StudyPatients Included in ITT PopulationActive Comparator116
Overall StudyPatients Included in ITT PopulationExperimental115
Overall StudyPatients Included in PP PopulationActive Comparator102
Overall StudyPatients Included in PP PopulationExperimental89
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDActive Comparator113
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDExperimental110

Adverse events10

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
seriousVIIth nerve paralysisNervous system disordersActive Comparator1139
seriousVIIth nerve paralysisNervous system disordersExperimental0112
seriousGenital neoplasm malignant femaleNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Active Comparator0139
seriousGenital neoplasm malignant femaleNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Experimental1112
seriousAngina pectorisCardiac disordersActive Comparator0139
seriousAngina pectorisCardiac disordersExperimental0112
seriousangina unstableCardiac disordersActive Comparator0139
seriousangina unstableCardiac disordersExperimental1112
seriousCoronary artery occlusionCardiac disordersActive Comparator0139
seriousCoronary artery occlusionCardiac disordersExperimental1112

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityActive Comparator
Total, all-cause mortalityExperimental
Total, other adverse eventsActive Comparator0139
Total, other adverse eventsExperimental0112
Total, serious adverse eventsActive Comparator1139
Total, serious adverse eventsExperimental3112

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Arm 1 - Active Comparator vs Arm 2 - Experimental: The Proportion of Patients With Resting Heart Rate Controlled to ≤60bpm Between GroupsTrial comparisons
Arm 1 - Active Comparator vs Arm 2 - Experimental: The Proportion of Patients With Resting Heart Rate Controlled to ≤60bpm Between GroupsTrial comparisons
Active Comparator vs Experimental: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01213173

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01213173/results?page=2