ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01217944

Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic Myopia

NCT01217944, Phase 3, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2013-10-18

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic Myopia. Trials, record NCT01217944. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01217944

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic Myopia
NCT number
NCT01217944
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
277 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Pathological Myopia
Interventions
Ranibizumab, Verteporfin PDT, Sham Ranibizumab, Sham verteporfin PDT
First posted
2010-10-08
Last updated
2014-02-10
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2010-021662-30
Results first posted
2013-10-18

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAverage Change From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 3 on Visual Acuity of the Study EyeBaseline, Month 1 through Month 3
The Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was tested using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity (VA) testing protocol. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position at an initial test distance of 4 meters using ETDRS charts at baseline and compared to the average from month 1 to month 3.
SecondaryAverage Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Visual Acuity of the Study EyeBaseline and Month 6
The Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was tested using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity (VA) testing protocol. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position at an initial test distance of 4 meters using ETDRS charts at baseline and month 6. The overall BCVA score was calculated using the BCVA worksheet.
SecondaryAverage Change From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 12 in Visual Acuity of the Study EyeBaseline and Month 1 through Month 12
The Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was tested using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Visual Acuity (VA) testing protocol. VA measurements were taken in a sitting position at an initial test distance of 4 meters using ETDRS charts at baseline and Month 1 through 12
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) ≥10 and ≥15 Letters Gain or Reach 84 Letters at Month 3Month 3
BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An ETDRS visual acuity score of 85 is approximately 20/20. An increased score indicates improvement in acuity. This outcome assessed the percentage of participants who gained more than 10 or more than 15 of visual acuity at month 3.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) ≥10 and ≥15 Letters Gain or Reach 84 Letters at Month 6 and Month 12Months 6 and 12
BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An increased score indicates improvement in acuity. This outcome assessed the percentage of participants who gained more than 10 or more than 15 letters of visual acuity at month 6 and month 12.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) ≥10 and ≥15 Letter Loss at Month 3Month 3
BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An ETDRS visual acuity score of 85 is approximately 20/20. A decreased score indicates worsening in acuity. This outcome assessed the percentage of participants who lost more than 10 or more than 15 of visual acuity at month 3.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) ≥10 and ≥15 Letter Loss at Month 6 and 12Months 6 and 12
BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An ETDRS visual acuity score of 85 is approximately 20/20. A decreased score indicates worsening in acuity. This outcome assessed the percentage of participants who lost more than 10 or more than 15 of visual acuity at month 6 and 12.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness of the Study Eye Over TimeBaseline, Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12Retinal thickness was measured by Central Reading Center using patient's Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) images provided by investigators.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Leakage in the Study EyeBaseline and Month 12
CNV leakage assessment plus other choroid and retinal disorders were assessed by Central Reading Center using patient's fluorescein angiography and color fundus photography images provided by investigators.
SecondaryNumber of Ranibizumab Injections Received Prior to Month 3Day 1 and prior to month 3In order to describe exposure to the study drug the number of ejections was evaluated

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAverage Change From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 3 on Visual Acuity of the Study EyeBaseline, Month 1 through Month 3
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analysis. Missing data were imputed with Last Observation Carried Forward
LettersMEAN
SECONDARYAverage Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Visual Acuity of the Study EyeBaseline and Month 6
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analysis. Missing data were imputed with Last Observation Carried Forward
LettersMEAN
SECONDARYAverage Change From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 12 in Visual Acuity of the Study EyeBaseline and Month 1 through Month 12
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analysis. Missing data were imputed with Last Observation Carried Forward
LettersMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) ≥10 and ≥15 Letters Gain or Reach 84 Letters at Month 3Month 3
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analysis. Missing data were imputed with Last Observation Carried Forward
Percentage of PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) ≥10 and ≥15 Letters Gain or Reach 84 Letters at Month 6 and Month 12Months 6 and 12
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analysis. Missing data were imputed with Last Observation Carried Forward
Percentage of PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) ≥10 and ≥15 Letter Loss at Month 3Month 3
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analysis. Missing data were imputed with Last Observation Carried Forward
Percentage of PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) ≥10 and ≥15 Letter Loss at Month 6 and 12Months 6 and 12
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analysis. Missing data were imputed with Last Observation Carried Forward
Percentage of PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness of the Study Eye Over TimeBaseline, Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analysis. Missing data were imputed with Last Observation Carried Forward
MicronsMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Leakage in the Study EyeBaseline and Month 12
Participants from the Full Analysis Set, included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, with data available for analysis. Missing data were imputed with Last Observation Carried Forward
Percentage of PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Ranibizumab Injections Received Prior to Month 3Day 1 and prior to month 3The Safety Set consisted of all patients who received at least one application of study treatment (ranibizumab \[sham\] and/or vPDT \[sham\]) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessmentinjectionsMEAN

Results by group91

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Average Change From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 3 on Visual Acuity of the Study Eye0.5 mg Ranibizumab Driven by Stabilization CriteriaBaseline55.4Standard Deviation 13.43Letters
Average Change From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 3 on Visual Acuity of the Study Eye0.5mg Ranibizumab Driven by Disease ActivityBaseline55.8Standard Deviation 12.59Letters
Average Change From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 3 on Visual Acuity of the Study EyeVerteporfin PDTBaseline54.7Standard Deviation 13.84Letters
Average Change From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 3 on Visual Acuity of the Study Eye0.5 mg Ranibizumab Driven by Stabilization CriteriaAverage Month 1 to month 366.0Standard Deviation 12.98Letters
Average Change From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 3 on Visual Acuity of the Study Eye0.5mg Ranibizumab Driven by Disease ActivityAverage Month 1 to month 366.4Standard Deviation 12.28Letters
Average Change From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 3 on Visual Acuity of the Study EyeVerteporfin PDTAverage Month 1 to month 356.9Standard Deviation 14.49Letters
Average Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Visual Acuity of the Study Eye0.5 mg Ranibizumab Driven by Stabilization CriteriaBaseline55.4Standard Deviation 13.43Letters
Average Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Visual Acuity of the Study Eye0.5mg Ranibizumab Driven by Disease ActivityBaseline55.8Standard Deviation 12.59Letters
Average Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Visual Acuity of the Study EyeVerteporfin PDTBaseline54.7Standard Deviation 13.84Letters
Average Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Visual Acuity of the Study Eye0.5 mg Ranibizumab Driven by Stabilization CriteriaAverage month 1 to month 669.2Standard Deviation 12.44Letters

Participant flow15

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTED0.5 mg Ranibizumab Driven by Stabilization Criteria106
Overall StudySTARTED0.5mg Ranibizumab Driven by Disease Activity116
Overall StudySTARTEDVerteporfin PDT55
Overall StudyCompleted 3 Months0.5 mg Ranibizumab Driven by Stabilization Criteria105
Overall StudyCompleted 3 Months0.5mg Ranibizumab Driven by Disease Activity116
Overall StudyCompleted 3 MonthsVerteporfin PDT55
Overall StudyCompleted 6 Months0.5 mg Ranibizumab Driven by Stabilization Criteria103
Overall StudyCompleted 6 Months0.5mg Ranibizumab Driven by Disease Activity116
Overall StudyCompleted 6 MonthsVerteporfin PDT55
Overall StudyCOMPLETED0.5 mg Ranibizumab Driven by Stabilization Criteria100

Adverse events164

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disorders0.5 mg Ranibizumab Driven by Stabilization Criteria0106
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disorders0.5mg Ranibizumab Driven by Disease Activity2118
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersVisudyne PDT: Grp III With 0.5mg Ranibizumab From Month 3038
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersVisudyne PDT: Grp III Without 0.5mg Ranibizumab From Month 3115
otherBlindness (Study eye)Eye disorders0.5 mg Ranibizumab Driven by Stabilization Criteria0106
otherBlindness (Study eye)Eye disorders0.5mg Ranibizumab Driven by Disease Activity0118
otherBlindness (Study eye)Eye disordersVisudyne PDT: Grp III With 0.5mg Ranibizumab From Month 3138
otherBlindness (Study eye)Eye disordersVisudyne PDT: Grp III Without 0.5mg Ranibizumab From Month 3115
otherCataract (Study eye)Eye disorders0.5 mg Ranibizumab Driven by Stabilization Criteria1106
otherCataract (Study eye)Eye disorders0.5mg Ranibizumab Driven by Disease Activity2118

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortality0.5 mg Ranibizumab Driven by Stabilization Criteria
Total, all-cause mortality0.5mg Ranibizumab Driven by Disease Activity
Total, all-cause mortalityVisudyne PDT: Grp III With 0.5mg Ranibizumab From Month 3
Total, all-cause mortalityVisudyne PDT: Grp III Without 0.5mg Ranibizumab From Month 3
Total, other adverse events0.5 mg Ranibizumab Driven by Stabilization Criteria46106
Total, other adverse events0.5mg Ranibizumab Driven by Disease Activity47118
Total, other adverse eventsVisudyne PDT: Grp III With 0.5mg Ranibizumab From Month 31738
Total, other adverse eventsVisudyne PDT: Grp III Without 0.5mg Ranibizumab From Month 3815
Total, serious adverse events0.5 mg Ranibizumab Driven by Stabilization Criteria7106
Total, serious adverse events0.5mg Ranibizumab Driven by Disease Activity6118

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
24326106DERIVEDPubMed
25109929DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01217944

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01217944/results?page=2