ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01229423

Safety and Efficacy of LATISSE® in the Augmentation of Eyelashes of Korean Subjects

NCT01229423, Phase 4, Completed, Allergan; results first posted 2012-01-23

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy of LATISSE® in the Augmentation of Eyelashes of Korean Subjects. Trials, record NCT01229423. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01229423

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy of LATISSE® in the Augmentation of Eyelashes of Korean Subjects
NCT number
NCT01229423
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
62 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Allergan
Conditions
Eyelash Hypotrichosis
Interventions
bimatoprost 0.03%
First posted
2010-10-27
Last updated
2019-01-29
Results first posted
2012-01-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Eyelash Length at Week 20Baseline, Week 20
Change from baseline in eyelash length at Week 20. Measurements made were based on the mean length of the upper left and right eyelashes. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in eyelash length, and a negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in eyelash length.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With an Improvement of at Least 1-Point in Global Eyelash Assessment (GEA) Score at Week 20Week 20
Percentage of subjects with an improvement of at least 1-point in GEA score at Week 20 from baseline. The GEA scale is an investigator-graded 4-point scale of overall eyelash prominence where 1=minimal, 2=moderate, 3=marked, and 4=very marked prominence.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Eyelash Thickness at Week 20Baseline, Week 20
Change from baseline in eyelash thickness at Week 20. Assessments made were based on the mean thickness of the upper left and right eyelashes. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in eyelash thickness, and a negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in eyelash thickness.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Eyelash Intensity (Darkness) at Week 20Baseline, Week 20
Change from baseline in eyelash intensity (darkness) at Week 20. Assessments made were based on the mean eyelash intensity of the upper left and right eyelashes. Intensity was measured on a scale ranging from 0 (black) to 255 (white). A negative change from baseline indicates eyelash darkening in color, and a positive change from baseline indicates eyelash lightening in color.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With an Improvement in Satisfaction With Overall Eyelash Prominence at Week 20Week 20
Percentage of subjects with an improvement in satisfaction with overall eyelash prominence at Week 20. Subject satisfaction with overall eyelash prominence was assessed by response to the question "Overall how satisfied are you with your eyelashes?" Responses were based on a 5-point scale ("very unsatisfied", "unsatisfied", "neutral", "satisfied", "very satisfied"). Improvement in subject satisfaction is defined as a 1-point increase from baseline.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects Satisfied With Treatment at Week 20Week 20
Percentage of subjects satisfied with treatment at week 20 was assessed using the Treatment Satisfaction Scale response to the question "Which best describes your satisfaction with LATISSE®?" Responses were "very satisfied", "satisfied", "neutral", "unsatisfied", and "very unsatisfied." Satisfied is defined as responses of "very satisfied" and "satisfied."

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Eyelash Length at Week 20Baseline, Week 20Intent-to-Treat (ITT) included all patients enrolled in the trial who received at least one application of study drug.Millimeter (mm)MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With an Improvement of at Least 1-Point in Global Eyelash Assessment (GEA) Score at Week 20Week 20Intent-to-Treat (ITT) included all patients enrolled in the trial who received at least one application of study drug.Percentage of SubjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Eyelash Thickness at Week 20Baseline, Week 20Intent-to-Treat (ITT) included all patients enrolled in the trial who received at least one application of study drug.Millimeters Squared (mm^2)MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Eyelash Intensity (Darkness) at Week 20Baseline, Week 20Intent-to-Treat (ITT) included all patients enrolled in the trial who received at least one application of study drug.Units on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With an Improvement in Satisfaction With Overall Eyelash Prominence at Week 20Week 20Intent-to-Treat (ITT) included all patients enrolled in the trial who received at least one application of study drug.Percentage of SubjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects Satisfied With Treatment at Week 20Week 20Intent-to-Treat (ITT) included all patients enrolled in the trial who received at least one application of study drug.Percentage of SubjectsNUMBER

Results by group9

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Eyelash Length at Week 20LATISSE®Baseline5.92Standard Deviation 0.72Millimeter (mm)
Change From Baseline in Eyelash Length at Week 20LATISSE®Change from Baseline at Week 201.10Standard Deviation 0.8Millimeter (mm)
Percentage of Subjects With an Improvement of at Least 1-Point in Global Eyelash Assessment (GEA) Score at Week 20LATISSE®81.4Percentage of Subjects
Change From Baseline in Eyelash Thickness at Week 20LATISSE®Baseline1.39Standard Deviation 0.395Millimeters Squared (mm^2)
Change From Baseline in Eyelash Thickness at Week 20LATISSE®Change from Baseline at Week 200.25Standard Deviation 0.269Millimeters Squared (mm^2)
Change From Baseline in Eyelash Intensity (Darkness) at Week 20LATISSE®Baseline140.02Standard Deviation 15.788Units on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Eyelash Intensity (Darkness) at Week 20LATISSE®Change from Baseline at Week 20-12.97Standard Deviation 13.115Units on a Scale
Percentage of Subjects With an Improvement in Satisfaction With Overall Eyelash Prominence at Week 20LATISSE®83.05Percentage of Subjects
Percentage of Subjects Satisfied With Treatment at Week 20LATISSE®83.1Percentage of Subjects

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLATISSE®62
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLATISSE®47
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLATISSE®15

Adverse events4

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherConjunctival HyperaemiaEye disordersLATISSE®662
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsLATISSE®962
otherHypertrichosisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersLATISSE®462
otherSkin Hyperpigmentation (eyelid)Skin and subcutaneous tissue disordersLATISSE®862

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLATISSE®
Total, other adverse eventsLATISSE®2762
Total, serious adverse eventsLATISSE®062

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
25228046BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01229423

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01229423/registered