ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01231607

Dutasteride Versus Placebo and Finasteride in Men With Androgenetic Alopecia

NCT01231607, Phase 3, Completed, GlaxoSmithKline; results first posted 2012-10-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Dutasteride Versus Placebo and Finasteride in Men With Androgenetic Alopecia. Trials, record NCT01231607. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01231607

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Dutasteride Versus Placebo and Finasteride in Men With Androgenetic Alopecia
NCT number
NCT01231607
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
917 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Conditions
Androgenetic Alopecia
Interventions
1mg Finasteride active, 0.02mg dutasteride, 0.1mg dutasteride, 0.5mg dutasteride, Finasteride placebo, Dutasteride placebo
First posted
2010-11-01
Last updated
2018-08-10
Results first posted
2012-10-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes17

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline (BL) in Target Area Hair Count (HC) Within a 2.54 Centimeter (cm) (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 24, as Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (MT)Baseline and Week 24
The primary target area HC was based on the nonvellus hair (\>=30 micrometers \[μm\] in width; thick and noticeable hair) count within a target 2.54 cm (1 inch) diameter circle at the vertex (crown, topmost part of the head). A cosmetic ink dot was placed by tattoo at BL so that the same area could be identified at BL and post-BL. If the ink dot faded, it was re-done in exactly the same location to ensure visibility for subsequent photographs. For the MT, hair was clipped before each photograph; HC was based on hair follicles in the photographs. Change from BL=Week 24 value minus the BL value.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 24, as Assessed by MTBaseline and Week 24
The primary target area HC was based on the nonvellus hair (\>=30 micrometers \[μm\] in width; thick and noticeable hair) count within a target 1.13 cm (0.44 inch) diameter circle at the vertex (crown, topmost part of the head). A cosmetic ink dot was placed by tattoo at BL so that the same area could be identified at BL and post-BL. If the ink dot faded, it was re-done in exactly the same location to ensure visibility for subsequent photographs. For the MT, hair was clipped before each photograph; HC was based on hair follicles in the photographs. Change from BL=Week 24 value minus the BL value.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count Within a 2.54 cm (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 as Assessed by MTBaseline and Week 12
The primary target area HC was based on the nonvellus hair (\>=30 micrometers \[μm\] in width; thick and noticeable hair) count within a target 2.54 cm (1 inch) diameter circle at the vertex (crown, topmost part of the head). A cosmetic ink dot was placed by tattoo at BL so that the same area could be identified at BL and post-BL. If the ink dot faded, it was re-done in exactly the same location to ensure visibility for subsequent photographs. For the MT, hair was clipped before each photograph; HC was based on hair follicles in the photographs. Change from BL=Week 12 value minus the BL value.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex, as Assessed by MT at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
The primary target area HC was based on the nonvellus hair (\>=30 micrometers \[μm\] in width; thick and noticeable hair) count within a target 1.13 cm (0.44 inch) diameter circle at the vertex (crown, topmost part of the head). A cosmetic ink dot was placed by tattoo at BL so that the same area could be identified at BL and post-BL. If the ink dot faded, it was re-done in exactly the same location to ensure visibility for subsequent photographs. For the MT, hair was clipped before each photograph; HC was based on hair follicles in the photographs. Change from BL=Week 12 value minus the BL value.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Target Area Hair Width Within a 2.54 cm (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 and Week 24, as Assessed by MTBaseline, Week 12, and Week 24
The target area hair width was the sum of all nonvellus hairs (\>=30 µm in width; thick and noticeable hair) within a target 2.54 cm (1 inch) diameter circle at the vertex (crown, topmost part of the head). For the MT, hair was clipped before each photograph. A cosmetic ink dot was placed by tattoo at Baseline so that the same area could be identified at Baseline and post-Baseline. If the ink dot faded, it was re-done in exactly the same location to ensure it was visible for subsequent photographs. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 12 or Week 24 value minus the Baseline value.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Target Area Hair Width Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 and Week 24, as Assessed by MTBaseline, Week 12, and Week 24
The target area hair width was the sum of all nonvellus hairs (\>=30 µm in width; thick and noticeable hair) within a target 1.13 cm (0.44 inch) diameter circle at the vertex (crown, topmost part of the head). For the MT, hair was clipped before each photograph. A cosmetic ink dot was placed by tattoo at Baseline so that the same area could be identified at Baseline and post-Baseline. If the ink dot faded, it was re-done in exactly the same location to ensure it was visible for subsequent photographs. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 12 or Week 24 value minus the Baseline value.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Terminal Hair Count (THC) Within a 2.54 cm (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 and Week 24, as Assessed by MTBaseline, Week 12, and Week 24
The THC (thick, long, and dark hair) was the sum of all nonvellus hairs (\>=60 μm in width; thick and noticeable hair) within a target 2.54 cm (1 inch) diameter circle at the vertex (crown, topmost part of the head). A cosmetic ink dot was placed by tattoo at BL so that the same area could be identified at BL and post-BL. If the ink dot faded, it was re-done in exactly the same location to ensure visibility for subsequent photographs. For the MT, hair was clipped before each photograph; HC was based on the hair follicles in the photographs. Change from BL=Week 12/Week 24 value minus BL value.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Terminal Hair Count Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 and Week 24, as Assessed by MTBaseline, Week 12, and Week 24
The THC (thick, long, and dark hair) was the sum of all nonvellus hairs (\>=60 μm in width; thick and noticeable hair) within a target 1.13 cm (0.44 inch) diameter circle at the vertex (crown, topmost part of the head). A cosmetic ink dot was placed by tattoo at BL so that the same area could be identified at BL and post-BL. If the ink dot faded, it was re-done in exactly the same location to ensure visibility for subsequent photographs. For the MT, hair was clipped before each photograph; HC was based on hair follicles in the photographs. Change from BL=Week 12/Week 24 value minus BL value.
SecondaryGlobal Assessment of Improvement From Baseline to Week 24 Assessed for Vertex and Frontal Views SeparatelyBaseline and Week 24
A central panel of 3 dermatologists independently assessed change in hair growth from Baseline to Week 24 using a 7-point scale: greatly decreased (-3), moderately decreased (-2), slightly decreased (-1), no change (0), slightly increased (1), moderately increased (2), and greatly increased (3). The median score, across the 3 panel members, is summarized. This assessment was performed by comparing the global photographs obtained at Baseline with those subsequently obtained at Week 24. This assessment was made separately based on the global photography of the vertex and frontal views.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Investigator Photographic Assessment Questionnaire (IPAQ) Scores Assessed at Week 12 for Vertex and Frontal Views SeparatelyBaseline and Week 12
The IPAQ was completed by the Investigator or designee by comparing the global photographs obtained at Baseline with those obtained at Week 12. This assessment was made separately based on the global photography of the vertex and frontal views. The change from Baseline in hair growth was assessed using the following 7-point scale: -3 = greatly decreased, -2 = moderately decreased, -1 = slightly decreased, 0 = no change, +1 = slightly increased, +2 = moderately increased, +3 = greatly increased.

Outcomes17

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline (BL) in Target Area Hair Count (HC) Within a 2.54 Centimeter (cm) (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 24, as Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (MT)Baseline and Week 24
Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Calculation was based on the last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation method for missing data. All participants for whom data were collected at both Baseline and Week 24 were assessed.
Hair countLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 24, as Assessed by MTBaseline and Week 24ITT Population. Calculation was based on the LOCF imputation method for missing data. All participants for whom data were collected at both Baseline and Week 24 were assessed.Hair countLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count Within a 2.54 cm (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 as Assessed by MTBaseline and Week 12ITT Population. Calculation was based on the LOCF imputation method for missing data. All participants for whom data were collected at both Baseline and Week 12 were assessed.Hair countLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex, as Assessed by MT at Week 12Baseline and Week 12ITT Population. Calculation was based on the LOCF imputation method for missing data. All participants for whom data were collected at both Baseline and Week 12 were assessed.Hair countLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Target Area Hair Width Within a 2.54 cm (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 and Week 24, as Assessed by MTBaseline, Week 12, and Week 24ITT Population. Calculation was based on the LOCF imputation method for missing data. All participants for whom data were collected at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24 were assessed.millimetersLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Target Area Hair Width Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 and Week 24, as Assessed by MTBaseline, Week 12, and Week 24ITT Population. Calculation was based on the LOCF imputation method for missing data. All participants for whom data were collected at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24 were assessed.millimetersLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Terminal Hair Count (THC) Within a 2.54 cm (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 and Week 24, as Assessed by MTBaseline, Week 12, and Week 24ITT Population. Calculation was based on the LOCF imputation method for missing data. All participants for whom data were collected at both Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24 were assessed.Hair countLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Terminal Hair Count Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 12 and Week 24, as Assessed by MTBaseline, Week 12, and Week 24ITT Population. Calculation was based on the LOCF imputation method for missing data. All participants for whom data were collected at both Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24 were assessed.Hair countLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYGlobal Assessment of Improvement From Baseline to Week 24 Assessed for Vertex and Frontal Views SeparatelyBaseline and Week 24ITT Population. Calculation was based on the LOCF imputation method for missing data. All participants for whom data were collected at both Baseline and Week 24 were assessed.scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Investigator Photographic Assessment Questionnaire (IPAQ) Scores Assessed at Week 12 for Vertex and Frontal Views SeparatelyBaseline and Week 12ITT Population. Calculation was based on the LOCF imputation method for missing data. All participants for whom data were collected at both Baseline and Week 12 were assessed.scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group434

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline (BL) in Target Area Hair Count (HC) Within a 2.54 Centimeter (cm) (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 24, as Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (MT)Placebo-4.9Standard Error 7.89Hair count
Change From Baseline (BL) in Target Area Hair Count (HC) Within a 2.54 Centimeter (cm) (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 24, as Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (MT)Dutasteride 0.02 mg17.1Standard Error 7.74Hair count
Change From Baseline (BL) in Target Area Hair Count (HC) Within a 2.54 Centimeter (cm) (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 24, as Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (MT)Dutasteride 0.1 mg63.0Standard Error 7.67Hair count
Change From Baseline (BL) in Target Area Hair Count (HC) Within a 2.54 Centimeter (cm) (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 24, as Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (MT)Dutasteride 0.5 mg89.6Standard Error 7.87Hair count
Change From Baseline (BL) in Target Area Hair Count (HC) Within a 2.54 Centimeter (cm) (1 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 24, as Assessed by Macrophotographic Technique (MT)Finasteride 1 mg56.5Standard Error 8.12Hair count
Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 24, as Assessed by MTPlacebo-0.3Standard Error 1.74Hair count
Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 24, as Assessed by MTDutasteride 0.02 mg4.2Standard Error 1.71Hair count
Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 24, as Assessed by MTDutasteride 0.1 mg12.4Standard Error 1.70Hair count
Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 24, as Assessed by MTDutasteride 0.5 mg18.1Standard Error 1.74Hair count
Change From Baseline in Target Area Hair Count Within a 1.13 cm (0.44 Inch) Diameter Circle at the Vertex at Week 24, as Assessed by MTFinasteride 1 mg12.1Standard Error 1.80Hair count

Participant flow15

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDDutasteride 0.02 mg185
Overall StudySTARTEDDutasteride 0.1 mg188
Overall StudySTARTEDDutasteride 0.5 mg184
Overall StudySTARTEDFinasteride 1 mg179
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo181
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDutasteride 0.02 mg156
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDutasteride 0.1 mg154
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDutasteride 0.5 mg153
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFinasteride 1 mg141
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo157

Adverse events85

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherErectile dysfunctionReproductive system and breast disordersDutasteride 0.02 mg8185
otherErectile dysfunctionReproductive system and breast disordersDutasteride 0.1 mg7188
otherErectile dysfunctionReproductive system and breast disordersDutasteride 0.5 mg10184
otherErectile dysfunctionReproductive system and breast disordersFinasteride 1 mg10179
otherErectile dysfunctionReproductive system and breast disordersPlacebo7181
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersDutasteride 0.02 mg8185
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersDutasteride 0.1 mg8188
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersDutasteride 0.5 mg11184
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersFinasteride 1 mg5179
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo16181

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDutasteride 0.02 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityDutasteride 0.1 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityDutasteride 0.5 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityFinasteride 1 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsDutasteride 0.02 mg34185
Total, other adverse eventsDutasteride 0.1 mg34188
Total, other adverse eventsDutasteride 0.5 mg41184
Total, other adverse eventsFinasteride 1 mg32179
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo36181

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01231607

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01231607/results?page=2