ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01232556

A Study Of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Plus Rituximab For Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Who Are Not Candidates For Intensive High-Dose Chemotherapy

NCT01232556, Phase 3, Terminated, Pfizer; results first posted 2018-08-21

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study Of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Plus Rituximab For Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Who Are Not Candidates For Intensive High-Dose Chemotherapy. Trials, record NCT01232556. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01232556

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study Of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Plus Rituximab For Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Who Are Not Candidates For Intensive High-Dose Chemotherapy
NCT number
NCT01232556
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
338 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
Interventions
Inotuzumab ozogamicin, Rituximab, rituximab + gemcitabine, rituximab +bendamustine
First posted
2010-11-02
Last updated
2019-01-08
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2010-020147-12
Results first posted
2018-08-21
Limitations and caveats
Interpretation of the results is limited by the small number of subjects analyzed and follow-up period was shortened due to the early termination of the study.~Adverse Events were calculated using the safety populations.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverall SurvivalFrom randomization up to 5 years after last dose or up to final study visit, whichever occurs first.
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact or the end of the study. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine OS. The hazard ratio and corresponding 95% 2-sided confidence interval were calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazard regression.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) (Safety Population)Up to 20 weeks after the first dose of study drugIncludes all TEAEs: Any event that occurred after the first dose of study drug and was not present prior to study drug administration or worsened in severity after study drug administration..
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS)From randomization up to 2 years or final study visit, whichever occurs first, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled approximately every 12 weeks.
PFS is defined as time from date of randomization to date of progressive disease (PD, including investigator's claim of clinical progression), date of death from any cause, or initiation of a new treatment for the lymphoma due to persistent/refractory disease. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine PFS. The hazard ratio and corresponding 95% 2-sided confidence interval were calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazard regression. PD requires the following: 1. Appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of treatment, even if other lesions are decreasing in size. 2. At least a 50% increase from nadir in the sum of the product diameters of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions. 3. At least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node more than 1 cm in its short axis.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With A Best Overall Response of CR or Partial Response (PR) Per NCI International Response Criteria for NHLUp to 2 years from first study drug dose or up to final study visit, whichever occurs first, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled approximately every 12 weeks.
CR is defined as disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease (including cleared infiltrate on repeat bone marrow aspirate/biopsy if lymphoma involvement of bone marrow before treatment). Partial Response (PR) requires the following: 1. ≥50 % decrease in SPD of the six largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. 2. No increase in the size of other nodes, liver, or spleen. 3. Splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by ≥50% in the SPD, or for single nodules, in the greatest transverse diameter. 4. With the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. 5. No new sites of disease. The 95% CI was determined using the exact method based on binomial distribution.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With A Best Overall Response of CR, Unconfirmed CR (unCR), PR, or Unconfirmed PR (unPR) Per NCI International Response Criteria for NHLUp to 2 years from first study drug dose or up to final study visit, whichever occurs first, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled approximately every 12 weeks.
CR is defined as disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease (including cleared infiltrate on repeat bone marrow aspirate/biopsy if lymphoma involvement of bone marrow before treatment). Partial Response (PR) requires the following: 1. ≥50 % decrease in SPD of the six largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. 2. No increase in the size of other nodes, liver, or spleen. 3. Splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by ≥50% in the SPD, or for single nodules, in the greatest transverse diameter. 4. With the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. 5. No new sites of disease. unCR and unPR means didn't have confirmatory assessment (including bone marrow assessment for CR). The 95% CI was determined using the exact method based on binomial distribution.
SecondaryDuration of ResponseUp to 2 years from first study drug dose or up to final study visit, whichever occurs first, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled approximately every 12 weeks.
The duration of overall response is measured from the first date of response until the first date that the progressive disease (PD) or death is objectively documented. The hazard ratio and corresponding 95% 2-sided confidence interval were calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazard regression.
SecondaryHealth Status as Assessed by the European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) QuestionnaireAssessed at Day 1 of each cycle and 6-9 weeks after the last dose, Cycle 3 (Week 12) reported
EQ-5D consists of a descriptive system and an EQ visual analogue scale. The descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. The scale, the best state is marked 100 and the worst state is marked 0, is to help the participant to say how good or bad a health state is. EQ-5D index, which was reported, was derived based on US weight. The range of EQ-5D index is -0.109 to 1.00. Higher scores mean better outcomes. The average post-baseline scores for EQ-5D index were computed at approximately Week 12. The overall treatment comparisons were estimated at approximately Week 12.
SecondaryHealth Related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) QuestionnaireAssessed at Day 1 of each cycle and 6-9 weeks after the last dose, Cycle 3 (Week 12) reported
FACT-Lym is a questionnaire that begins with 27 items covering four core Health-Related Quality of Life subscales: Physical Well-being (7 items), Social/Family Well-being (7), Emotional Well-being (6), and Functional Well-being (7). The FACT-Lym also includes an additional concerns subscale (15 items). It also asks participants about their concerns about lumps and swelling, fevers, infections, weight, appetite, emotional stability and treatment. The participants were requested to circle one number on a 0 to 4 points scale per line to indicate how true each statement has been for him/her during the past 7 days. FACT-Lym total score, which was reported, was derived based on FACT-Lym scoring guideline (Version 4). The range of FACT-Lym total score is 0 to 168. Higher scores mean better outcomes. The average post-baseline FACT-Lym total scores were computed at approximately Week 12. The overall treatment comparisons were estimated at approximately Week 12.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYOverall SurvivalFrom randomization up to 5 years after last dose or up to final study visit, whichever occurs first.ITT Population.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYProgression-Free Survival (PFS)From randomization up to 2 years or final study visit, whichever occurs first, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled approximately every 12 weeks.ITT PopulationMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With A Best Overall Response of CR or Partial Response (PR) Per NCI International Response Criteria for NHLUp to 2 years from first study drug dose or up to final study visit, whichever occurs first, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled approximately every 12 weeks.ITT PopulationPercentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With A Best Overall Response of CR, Unconfirmed CR (unCR), PR, or Unconfirmed PR (unPR) Per NCI International Response Criteria for NHLUp to 2 years from first study drug dose or up to final study visit, whichever occurs first, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled approximately every 12 weeks.ITT PopulationPercentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of ResponseUp to 2 years from first study drug dose or up to final study visit, whichever occurs first, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled approximately every 12 weeks.ITT population; only participants with a CR, unCR, PR, or unPR were included in the analysisMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYHealth Status as Assessed by the European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) QuestionnaireAssessed at Day 1 of each cycle and 6-9 weeks after the last dose, Cycle 3 (Week 12) reportedITT populationUnit on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYHealth Related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) QuestionnaireAssessed at Day 1 of each cycle and 6-9 weeks after the last dose, Cycle 3 (Week 12) reportedITT populationUnit on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) (Safety Population)Up to 20 weeks after the first dose of study drug
Safety Population - included all participants who received at least 1 dose of test article (either inotuzumab ozogamicin administrated in combination with rituximab or investigator's choice). This population only excluded participants who never received any test article.
Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER

Results by group28

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Overall SurvivalInotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab9.595% Confidence Interval 7.0 to 14.5Months
Overall SurvivalRituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine9.595% Confidence Interval 7.7 to 14.1Months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Inotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab3.795% Confidence Interval 2.9 to 5.0Months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Rituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine3.595% Confidence Interval 2.8 to 4.9Months
Percentage of Participants With A Best Overall Response of CR or Partial Response (PR) Per NCI International Response Criteria for NHLInotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab29.595% Confidence Interval 22.70 to 37.08Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With A Best Overall Response of CR or Partial Response (PR) Per NCI International Response Criteria for NHLRituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine29.795% Confidence Interval 22.94 to 37.08Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With A Best Overall Response of CR, Unconfirmed CR (unCR), PR, or Unconfirmed PR (unPR) Per NCI International Response Criteria for NHLInotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab41.095% Confidence Interval 33.40 to 48.85Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With A Best Overall Response of CR, Unconfirmed CR (unCR), PR, or Unconfirmed PR (unPR) Per NCI International Response Criteria for NHLRituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine43.695% Confidence Interval 36.07 to 51.36Percentage of Participants
Duration of ResponseInotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab11.5695% Confidence Interval 7.8 to NAMonths
Duration of ResponseRituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine6.9395% Confidence Interval 5.5 to 10.8Months

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDInotuzumab Ozogamicin Plus (+) Rituximab166
Overall StudySTARTEDRituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine172
Overall StudyTreatedInotuzumab Ozogamicin Plus (+) Rituximab165
Overall StudyTreatedRituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine167
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDInotuzumab Ozogamicin Plus (+) Rituximab7
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDInotuzumab Ozogamicin Plus (+) Rituximab159
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine171

Adverse events328

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersInotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab24164
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine43167
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersInotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab37164
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine54167
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersInotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab28164
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine39167
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersInotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab57164
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine81167
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersInotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab101164
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine64167

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityInotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab
Total, all-cause mortalityRituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine
Total, other adverse eventsInotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab155164
Total, other adverse eventsRituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine158167
Total, serious adverse eventsInotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab61164
Total, serious adverse eventsRituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine63167

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab vs Rituximab+Gemcitabine or Rituximab+Bendamustine: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01232556

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01232556/results?page=2