ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01251146

A Randomized Controlled Study to Assess the Effects of Bisoprolol and Atenolol on Resting Heart Rate and Sympathetic Nervous System's Activity in Subjects With Essential Hypertension

NCT01251146, Phase 4, Completed, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; results first posted 2012-11-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Randomized Controlled Study to Assess the Effects of Bisoprolol and Atenolol on Resting Heart Rate and Sympathetic Nervous System's Activity in Subjects With Essential Hypertension. Trials, record NCT01251146. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01251146

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Randomized Controlled Study to Assess the Effects of Bisoprolol and Atenolol on Resting Heart Rate and Sympathetic Nervous System's Activity in Subjects With Essential Hypertension
NCT number
NCT01251146
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
177 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Conditions
Hypertension
Interventions
Bisoprolol, Atenolol
First posted
2010-12-01
Last updated
2017-03-08
Results first posted
2012-11-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Baroreflex Sensitivity (BRS) at Attainment of Heart Rate GoalBaseline and attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6)
Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is an important characteristic of baroreflex control and often noninvasively assessed by relating heart rate (HR) fluctuations to blood pressure (BP) fluctuations. Heart rate goal was defined as attainment of heart rate less than or equal to 65 beats per minute (bpm).
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Baroreflex Sensitivity (BRS) at End of Follow-upBaseline and end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)
Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is an important characteristic of baroreflex control and often noninvasively assessed by relating heart rate (HR) fluctuations to blood pressure (BP) fluctuations. Heart rate goal was defined as attainment of heart rate less than or equal to 65 bpm.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Variability (HRV) for Low Frequency Power (LF) and for High Frequency Power (HF) at Attainment of Heart Rate Goal and End of Follow-upBaseline, attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6) and end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)
Heart rate variability (HRV) is used to describe the variations of both instantaneous HR and resting rate (RR) intervals and was evaluated for low frequency power (LF) and for high frequency power (HF). Heart rate goal was defined as attainment of heart rate less than or equal to 65 bpm.
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Ratio of Heart Rate Variability (HRV) for Low Frequency Power (LF) to Heart Rate Variability Power (HRV) for High Frequency (HF) (LF/HF) at Attainment of Heart Rate Goal and End of Follow-up
Baseline, attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6) and end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)
Heart rate variability (HRV) is used to describe the variations of both instantaneous HR and resting rate (RR) intervals and was evaluated for low frequency power (LF) and for high frequency power (HF). Heart rate goal was defined as attainment of heart rate less than or equal to 65 bpm.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Attaining Heart Rate Goal at Dosage 1, 2 and 3 of Study TreatmentBaseline up to attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6)
Dosage 1, 2 and 3 for bisoprolol group was defined as 5 mg, 7.5 mg and 10 mg once daily and for atenolol group as 50 mg, 75 mg and 100 mg once daily, respectively. Heart rate goal was defined as attainment of heart rate less than or equal to 65 bpm.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Attaining Heart Rate Goal at Week 2, 4 and 6Attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6)Heart rate goal was defined as attainment of heart rate less than or equal to 65 bpm.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)
AE: any new untoward medical occurrence/worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. SAE: Any AE that resulted in death; was life threatening; resulted in persistent/significant disability/incapacity; resulted in/prolonged an existing in-patient hospitalization; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was a medically important condition
SecondaryNumber of Participants Compliant With Study TreatmentBaseline up to end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)Participants compliant with study treatment were the participants who have completed the study treatment regimen.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Baroreflex Sensitivity (BRS) at Attainment of Heart Rate GoalBaseline and attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6)
Intention to treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. N signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure. n signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at the specified time point for each treatment arm group respectively.
millisecond per millimeter of mercuryMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Baroreflex Sensitivity (BRS) at End of Follow-upBaseline and end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. N signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure.millisecond per millimeter of mercuryMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Variability (HRV) for Low Frequency Power (LF) and for High Frequency Power (HF) at Attainment of Heart Rate Goal and End of Follow-upBaseline, attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6) and end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)
ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. N signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure. n signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at the specified time point for each treatment arm group respectively.
millisecond square (ms^2)MEAN
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Ratio of Heart Rate Variability (HRV) for Low Frequency Power (LF) to Heart Rate Variability Power (HRV) for High Frequency (HF) (LF/HF) at Attainment of Heart Rate Goal and End of Follow-up
Baseline, attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6) and end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)
ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. N signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure. n signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at the specified time point for each treatment arm group respectively.
ratioMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Attaining Heart Rate Goal at Dosage 1, 2 and 3 of Study TreatmentBaseline up to attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6)ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Attaining Heart Rate Goal at Week 2, 4 and 6Attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6)ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Compliant With Study TreatmentBaseline up to end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.participantsNUMBER

Results by group42

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Baroreflex Sensitivity (BRS) at Attainment of Heart Rate GoalBisoprololBaseline (n=75,79)7.78Standard Deviation 2.92millisecond per millimeter of mercury
Change From Baseline in Baroreflex Sensitivity (BRS) at Attainment of Heart Rate GoalAtenololBaseline (n=75,79)7.92Standard Deviation 3.26millisecond per millimeter of mercury
Change From Baseline in Baroreflex Sensitivity (BRS) at Attainment of Heart Rate GoalBisoprololChange at attainment of heart rate goal (n=67,66)3.27Standard Deviation 3.67millisecond per millimeter of mercury
Change From Baseline in Baroreflex Sensitivity (BRS) at Attainment of Heart Rate GoalAtenololChange at attainment of heart rate goal (n=67,66)2.88Standard Deviation 4.05millisecond per millimeter of mercury
Change From Baseline in Baroreflex Sensitivity (BRS) at End of Follow-upBisoprolol4.08Standard Deviation 3.79millisecond per millimeter of mercury
Change From Baseline in Baroreflex Sensitivity (BRS) at End of Follow-upAtenolol3.31Standard Deviation 3.83millisecond per millimeter of mercury
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate Variability (HRV) for Low Frequency Power (LF) and for High Frequency Power (HF) at Attainment of Heart Rate Goal and End of Follow-upBisoprololHRV for LF at Baseline (n=75,79)261.80Standard Deviation 208.40millisecond square (ms^2)
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate Variability (HRV) for Low Frequency Power (LF) and for High Frequency Power (HF) at Attainment of Heart Rate Goal and End of Follow-upAtenololHRV for LF at Baseline (n=75,79)322.09Standard Deviation 315.30millisecond square (ms^2)
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate Variability (HRV) for Low Frequency Power (LF) and for High Frequency Power (HF) at Attainment of Heart Rate Goal and End of Follow-upBisoprololChange for LF: heart rate goal (n=71,71)90.04Standard Deviation 352.97millisecond square (ms^2)
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate Variability (HRV) for Low Frequency Power (LF) and for High Frequency Power (HF) at Attainment of Heart Rate Goal and End of Follow-upAtenololChange for LF: heart rate goal (n=71,71)26.14Standard Deviation 416.51millisecond square (ms^2)

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBisoprolol86
Overall StudySTARTEDAtenolol91
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBisoprolol83
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAtenolol81
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBisoprolol3
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAtenolol10

Adverse events12

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersBisoprolol086
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersAtenolol291
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersBisoprolol086
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersAtenolol191
otherElevated TriglycerideMetabolism and nutrition disordersBisoprolol486
otherElevated TriglycerideMetabolism and nutrition disordersAtenolol491
otherElevated CholesterolMetabolism and nutrition disordersBisoprolol286
otherElevated CholesterolMetabolism and nutrition disordersAtenolol091
otherBradycardiaCardiac disordersBisoprolol086
otherBradycardiaCardiac disordersAtenolol191

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBisoprolol
Total, all-cause mortalityAtenolol
Total, other adverse eventsBisoprolol686
Total, other adverse eventsAtenolol691
Total, serious adverse eventsBisoprolol086
Total, serious adverse eventsAtenolol091

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Bisoprolol vs Atenolol: Number of Participants Compliant With Study TreatmentTrial comparisons
Bisoprolol vs Atenolol: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01251146

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01251146/results?page=2